[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
Some years ago I developped a relational database that was faster than
Filemaker.
There were about 70 records... FMP just chocked on it. HC stacks choked
after
12 MBs of data where in...
The trick was to split the interface/engine from the records which were in
At 8:57 PM + 7/13/01, jbv wrote:
But if you start the kind of above description, you'll just look like a
weird hacker and will probably loose the client...
So you don't describe it like that. Instead you say, We use a binary tree database
with doubly-linked records. If they ask for
At 8:57 PM + 7/13/01, jbv wrote:
But if you start the kind of above description, you'll just look like a
weird hacker and will probably loose the client...
So you don't describe it like that. Instead you say, We use a binary tree database
with doubly-linked records. If they ask for
jbv wrote:
Besides, there are also economic logistic considerations : in case
you get a terrible accident shortly before the whole project is finished
or decide to give up any software development activity and hide out
in a tibetan monastery for the rest of your life, who's gonna help
your
Robert Brenstein :
I just read that Panorama recently released v4.0 (see
http://maccentral.macworld.com/news/0107/10.panorama.shtml).
Given that both MC and Panorama are RAM-based, anyone have insights into why
building databases in native MC is discouraged?
I am not an expert but
