Yes. I started using Valentina with HyperCard and then switched to
MetaCard. Revolution came along but I continue with MetaCard and
Valentina. Which version of Valentina is optimal for your MetaCard is
to be checked. I presume that by MetaCard 2.5 you mean Rev engine 2.5
with MC IDE.
Hi Ken andf y'all,
Alain, one caveat on using Valentina
is whether the *current* Valentina will
work with MC 2.5; you may need to find
acquire an older version for it to work.
You should contact Ruslan Zasukhin at
Paradigmasoft to find out for sure.
Thanks for the tip. I already have, and
As it has been for y'all, I surmise, because respondents in this thread have
been unanimously favorable to Valentina. No one reported any regret. Not
so-far, anyways. I'd like to hear from other Valentina users too, or would-be
users that were discouraged.. or whomever has something relevant
On 22/12/08 at 15:31 -0600 Ken Ray apparently wrote:
Actually, I'm not completely in the yay-Valentina! camp. ;-)
As Ken says, support is a big forte of Valentina. On the other hand,
the documentation has been always somewhat deficient. At least, there
is now a decent set of examples for
NOTE, however, that (a) we were using Valentina 1.x, not 2.x
(which is supposed to be more stable/flexible/etc.), (b) we
were not having any problems with our smaller customers (i.e.
2-20 concurrent users) but only had problems with the larger
ones (50-150 concurrent users), and (c)
Hello y'all,
Is it possible to use Valentina with MetaCard 2.5 ?
Or does it necessarily *require* Runtime Revolution ?
N.B.: *not* even 2.6 .. it *has* to be for 2.5 ..
because version 2.5 is what I got *and*
I don't want to upgrade unless it's strictly necessary.
Thanks y'all
On 19/12/08 at 12:51 -0800 Alain Farmer apparently wrote:
Hello y'all,
Is it possible to use Valentina with MetaCard 2.5 ?
Or does it necessarily *require* Runtime Revolution ?
N.B.: *not* even 2.6 .. it *has* to be for 2.5 ..
because version 2.5 is what I got *and*
I don't want
