Thank you for your hints.
Unfortunately i can't get metacard. Is there any resource on the web
that explains what one needs to do, if one has Rev, but no Metacard
installed yet?
I fainthly remember I need another license number from rev, gonna mail
support for that...
I also browsed the
On 08 Jun 2007, at 12:44, Wilhelm Sanke wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jun 2007, Ken Ray wrote:
3) Add a substack to your main stack window called something like
BVGExternals and a custom property to your main stack window to hold
a path to the revXML external. When you launch check to see if you're
in
Björnke von Gierke wrote:
On 08 Jun 2007, at 12:44, Wilhelm Sanke wrote:
On Thu, 07 Jun 2007, Ken Ray wrote:
3) Add a substack to your main stack window called something like
BVGExternals and a custom property to your main stack window to hold
a path to the revXML external. When you launch
Wilhelm Sanke wrote:
Another way to do this:
put revxml.dll and the Rev folder documentation into your MC folder
(you can delete most of it afterwards).
Open BvG_docu stack and add revxml.dll under components,
externals. Do the same for substack docsLib after topleveling it.
Save BvG_docu
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007 11:56:46 +0200, Björnke von Gierke wrote:
I fainthly remember I need another license number from rev, gonna
mail support for that...
Good question... Richard and I discovered a few nights ago that if you
move the 'mchome.mc' and 'mctools.mc' stacks into the directory where
I also browsed the files in the metacard yahoo group, but couldn't
find the metacard ide, only the mctools.mc stack. Where do I get the
full MC IDE from?
Good point! Klaus, I think you should post the full set (mctools,
mchome, and mchelp) with each new IDE build even though the home and
help
J. Landman Gay wrote:
Wilhelm Sanke wrote:
Folder documents now contains an additional subfolder BvG_docu.
This is the only thing you need to run the dictionary, You can throw
out folders and files packaged_XML, rev, pdf (unless you intend
to use these special rev-files or the PDF user
Wilhelm Sanke wrote:
Folder documents now contains an additional subfolder BvG_docu. This
is the only thing you need to run the dictionary, You can throw out
folders and files packaged_XML, rev, pdf (unless you intend to use
these special rev-files or the PDF user documentation), glos.index,
Richard Gaskin wrote:
What would it take to be able to open Rev's Help right in MC?
About half of their IDE. ;) They use a whole lot of custom Rev handlers.
I like the current mctranscript stack, it's very simple and easy. I
don't often feel a need for anything more complex, usually I just
J. Landman Gay wrote:
Richard Gaskin wrote:
What would it take to be able to open Rev's Help right in MC?
About half of their IDE. ;) They use a whole lot of custom Rev handlers.
I like the current mctranscript stack, it's very simple and easy. I
don't often feel a need for anything more
Richard Gaskin wrote:
Up for updating the mcTranscriptDict.mc to read the Rev files directly?
Their XML isn't hard to parse; the handlers already in there may do most
of it.
Yeah, maybe. But I don't want Björnke to think I'm competing with him.
He's willing to work pretty hard to bring
Ken Ray wrote...
Richard and I discovered a few nights ago that if you move the
'mchome.mc' and 'mctools.mc' stacks into the directory where
the Revolution 2.8.1 application exists. The next time you launch
Rev, it will open the MetaCard IDE.
Hey! Neat trick, Ken!
[... Tries it ...]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ken Ray wrote...
Richard and I discovered a few nights ago that if you move the
'mchome.mc' and 'mctools.mc' stacks into the directory where
the Revolution 2.8.1 application exists. The next time you launch
Rev, it will open the MetaCard IDE.
Hey! Neat trick,
On 08 Jun 2007, at 19:42, J. Landman Gay wrote:
Richard Gaskin wrote:
What would it take to be able to open Rev's Help right in MC?
About half of their IDE. ;) They use a whole lot of custom Rev
handlers.
I like the current mctranscript stack, it's very simple and easy. I
don't often
Björnke von Gierke wrote:
I like the current mctranscript stack, it's very simple and easy. I
don't often feel a need for anything more complex, usually I just need
to look up a behavior or syntax. I'd like to see it updated to read
the new Rev docs. On the other hand, I'm not familiar enough
The irony of all of it is that they wind up putting all of the data
into a single field, so I'm not sure why the entries aren't just
published as htmlText. :\
My stack allows you to highly customise the way, and especially in
which order, the parts of each entry should be shown. That would be
16 matches
Mail list logo
