Metacard 4

2009-09-05 Thread Richmond Mathewson
I had forgotten how awkward it was to get quite a lot of things donein Metacard as opposed to RunRev. I only 'made' Metacard 4 because, like the Eiger; it is there! I would also like to remind folk of the following inescapable facts: 1. You need to own some sort of RunRev Studio or Enterprise

Re: Metacard 4

2009-09-05 Thread Richard Gaskin
Richmond Mathewson wrote: 1. You need to own some sort of RunRev Studio or Enterprise to be able to pop the engine into the MC environment. True. The engine-based licensing Mr. Waddingham introduced in v2.7 has opened up whole new worlds for developers, allowing anyone to make any IDE

Re: Metacard 4

2009-09-05 Thread Richmond Mathewson
Richard Gaskin wrote: Know the engine. Trust the engine. Use the engine. Mind-numbing mantras are used for just that; to numb the mind and stop all discussion and critical thinking. This is why, although I work only with RunRev, I keep looking at HyperNext, Elefat and so on, because, while

Re: Metacard 4

2009-09-05 Thread Richard Gaskin
Richmond Mathewson wrote: Richard Gaskin wrote: Know the engine. Trust the engine. Use the engine. Mind-numbing mantras are used for just that; to numb the mind and stop all discussion and critical thinking. This is why, although I work only with RunRev, I keep looking at HyperNext, Elefat