Re: More CGI Stuff

2002-09-03 Thread Klaus Major
Hi Ruslan, on 9/1/02 17:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It exists, it just hasn't made it on the site yet. Ruslan? Yes, Brian, if Dave need it, please send to him YOUR copy of VXCMD macho Ruslan Does this mean there is a Mach-o version available now? I don't see it

Re: More CGI Stuff

2002-09-02 Thread Ruslan Zasukhin
on 9/1/02 17:54, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It exists, it just hasn't made it on the site yet. Ruslan? Yes, Brian, if Dave need it, please send to him YOUR copy of VXCMD macho Ruslan Does this mean there is a Mach-o version available now? I don't see it on your site.

Re: More CGI Stuff

2002-09-02 Thread Yennie
You can easily use a long-running Metacard stack in the background- just launch it normally and communicate from your CGI using sockets (or any other IAC). Problem is- you can only handle one connection at a time with the long-running stack. That is why I've been investigating using multiple

Re: More CGI Stuff

2002-09-01 Thread Dave Cragg
At 12:15 am +0300 31/8/02, Ruslan Zasukhin wrote: on 8/31/02 0:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Correct. 2.4.2 is the last version with a CFM-based Carbon version. Okay, I ask because for MC Classic we have use XFCN MC Carbon have use CODE resource MC Mach-o

Re: More CGI Stuff

2002-09-01 Thread Yennie
It exists, it just hasn't made it on the site yet. Ruslan? Ruslan Does this mean there is a Mach-o version available now? I don't see it on your site. Cheers Dave

Re: More CGI Stuff

2002-08-31 Thread Ruslan Zasukhin
on 8/31/02 5:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW, there is also a Darwin engine on X. What you mean ?  MetaCard.app ? No- the Darwin version is separate. It is X11-based command line tool. You can run scripts from Terminal, or if you install XDarwin you can run

Re: More CGI Stuff

2002-08-31 Thread Pierre Sahores
Phil Davis a écrit : - Original Message - From: David Bovill [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 11:33 AM Subject: Re: More CGI Stuff On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 16:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unfortunately, no- the server will spawn a new

Re: More CGI Stuff

2002-08-31 Thread Yennie
Which is very cool stuff! I just want to point out one difference that I'm trying to obtain, however: *multiple* long running processes with shared memory, and everything done with Metacard! =). Since I want most of the work to happen in Metacard, its not as valuable if I can only maintain one

Re: More CGI Stuff

2002-08-31 Thread andu
--On Saturday, August 31, 2002 20:51:31 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Which is very cool stuff! I just want to point out one difference that I'm trying to obtain, however: *multiple* long running processes with shared memory, and everything done with Metacard! =). Since I want most

Re: More CGI Stuff

2002-08-30 Thread David Bovill
On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 23:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Of course now I just need a way to maintain some persistent memory (i.e. database cache). Any ideas? I can write globals to disk if needed, but I can't afford to re-create the database cache on every run of the script. Sounds like maybe

Re: More CGI Stuff

2002-08-30 Thread Yennie
Can this be done by having MC running in the background *prior* to the cgi being called by the server - not sure how the os associated the script with the engine or whether it creates another process would like to though:) Unfortunately, no- the server will spawn a new cgi process for

Re: More CGI Stuff

2002-08-30 Thread Yennie
With 2) is the idea to have the cgi script switch on each call to another process? Yup. I figure if I spawn many cgi scripts but they all have to talk to the same long-running process, then I've lost all of the benefits of multiple processes anyway. So yeah- I'm trying to get multiple processes

Re: More CGI Stuff

2002-08-30 Thread Ruslan Zasukhin
Hi Guys, Am I right that in 4.3 version we have -- MetaCard PPC (Classic app) -- MetaCard.app (for X, mach-0) I.e we do not have CARBON version of MC to be used on 9 ? -- Best regards, Ruslan Zasukhin [ I feel the need...the need for speed ]

Re: More CGI Stuff

2002-08-30 Thread Yennie
Correct. 2.4.2 is the last version with a CFM-based Carbon version. FWIW, there is also a Darwin engine on X. Brian Am I right that in 4.3 version we have -- MetaCard PPC (Classic app) -- MetaCard.app (for X, mach-0) I.e we do not have CARBON version of MC to be used on 9 ?

Re: More CGI Stuff

2002-08-30 Thread Ruslan Zasukhin
on 8/31/02 0:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Correct. 2.4.2 is the last version with a CFM-based Carbon version. Okay, I ask because for MC Classic we have use XFCN MC Carbon have use CODE resource MC Mach-o use bundle So does this means that externals based on

Re: More CGI Stuff

2002-08-30 Thread Phil Davis
- Original Message - From: David Bovill [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 11:33 AM Subject: Re: More CGI Stuff On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 16:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unfortunately, no- the server will spawn a new cgi process for each request

Re: More CGI Stuff

2002-08-30 Thread Ken Ray
FWIW, I believe Pierre Sahores explained a way to use PHP to manage sockets and enable backend use of MC as a long-running process. I think it's related to this thread. (Wherever that explanation is in the archives, maybe Ken Ray would consider adding it to his already excellent Developer

Re: More CGI Stuff

2002-08-28 Thread Scott Raney
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So my question... is there *any* way to access externals (including the new Mach-o ones with 2.4.3) from a CGI script? This should just work on Win32 and MacOS systems. You can either send messages to the stack with the external, or use start

Re: More CGI Stuff

2002-08-28 Thread Yennie
Eh! You're right- it does work. It seems I had written off the MacOS engine for scripts (I've been using the Darwin engine) for other reasons (namely "open process" behavior). Anyway, externals can be used through scripts just fine by way of "start using" with the mach-o engine and a mach-o

More CGI Stuff

2002-08-27 Thread Yennie
Hi guys, With all of this CGI talk lately, I cooked something up. I've been working with a server program based on the ol' mc httpd stack, since I make heavy use of Valentina. However, I've always wanted to break it down into separate cgi scripts. Among other things, that gives me multiple