Chipp Walters wrote:
Jacque,
You seem to be the person who best understands this. Can you answer me
the questions below (as two emails to Kevin at RunRev are still awaiting
an answer)?
I can give you my interpretation of it, with the caveat that RR can
override me with a more exhaustive
Jacque,
Thanks for your clarification! I can breathe easier now. I assume below
you're not referring to either MC or Constellation regarding IDE's as
they both require a licensed Revolution engine to run. Also, the 'single
app' you're referring to of course is StackRunner?
-Chipp
J.
Mathewson wrote:
1. Why does RunRev not allow individuals who wish to work
with the MC IDE only a way to purchase the RR engine at a
reduced price without the RR IDE?
This list is for the enhancement and maintenance of the MetaCard IDE by
its users.
Kevin sometimes reads this list, but the
Just at present I am running a small English language
school which caters to 5-8 year-old Bulgarians. Parents pay
me to teach their kids Bulgarian - and, despite my best
efforts, the little boys and girls somehow manage to learn
the language :)
Now I have 3 tatty old PCs at one end of the
Mathewson wrote:
The question is, am I breaking RR's new rules about
customised splash screens (that contain NO acknowledgement
of RR - although there is a large sheet of paper on the
wall pointing out that all the programs I use have been
authored using Runtime Revolution) that have been
Jacque,
You seem to be the person who best understands this. Can you answer me
the questions below (as two emails to Kevin at RunRev are still awaiting
an answer)?
We all know that the new Rev Media app is supposed to work with
templated solutions. I believe one of them is a slideshow
).
JR
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of J. Landman Gay
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 7:39 PM
Cc: Discussions on Metacard
Subject: Re: Rev licensing
Also, even though you may be using the MC IDE, you are still using the
Revolution engine
MidiToolz wrote:
This licensing situation is getting a little too hostile for me. I am
developing an alternative solution in Java, so I have moved on. I still use
the 2.5 engine I licensed in 2002 from Scott Raney when I need to..
Interesting that you mentioned Java. I've been giving it a
Hello Shari, Kevin and y'all
I know folks have been discussing something
about players, but it sounded more like an
issue for those who wanted to create a
competing program to Rev.
From a business point of view: sounded like is not
sufficient. As an entrepreneur, I must know *exactly*
what
On 2/20/06 4:56 PM, Alain Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is precisely the question that I'm asking. Which
licence(s), if any, allow us to create standalones?
Are we allowed to bundle one|more stack(s) with it?
(which of course remain editable). Can we continue to
bundle a player of our
Hello Ken Ray,
Alain, are you a member of the Improve List?
No.
If so, please read the results of a
conversation I had with Kevin related
to standalones and players
(title: Tempest in a Teapot: A Resolution).
Can you give me/us an executive summary? :-)
Regards,
Alain
Richard Gaskin wrote:
Alain Farmer wrote:
Naturally, we are trying to 'hide' the xCard
origins of our custom solutions when releasing wares.
Solutions crafted with C++, for example, don't advert
the tools that they were edited and compiled with!
snip
I see nothing natural about choosing a
Hello Richard,
Today All RunRev requires is
(last I heard anyway):
This product was made with Revolution
Portions Copyright 2006 Runtime Revolution Ltd.
I don't object to including of a copyright notice in
*MY* splash-screen, and definitely in the About and
other docs, but the issue is
Alain Farmer wrote:
My customers don't want to know what I've used. In the
worst-case, they don't want to be bothered yet insist
on some particular tools because they have heard so
on that these tools are the ones that serious outfits
are using. PHP versus MetaCard comes to mind; at least
to
Alain Farmer wrote:
Hello Richard,
Today All RunRev requires is
(last I heard anyway):
This product was made with Revolution
Portions Copyright 2006 Runtime Revolution Ltd.
I don't object to including of a copyright notice in
*MY* splash-screen, and definitely in the About and
other
I hear the sound of straws being grasped so as to drag this thread out
longer than would be truly required
LOL. I gotta save this one for future use.
Nice.
- Scott
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
Ken Ray wrote:
On 2/20/06 9:49 PM, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The issue is whether we can create our own custom
standalone 'players', with our own custom splash
screen, for the editable stacks that we craft for our
customers.
Kevin clarified this, and Ken recapped it. That was
Richard Gaskin wrote:
Ken Ray wrote:
On 2/20/06 9:49 PM, Richard Gaskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The issue is whether we can create our own custom
standalone 'players', with our own custom splash
screen, for the editable stacks that we craft for our
customers.
Kevin clarified this, and Ken
Shari wrote:
snipping liberally
You are right, I do not miss what I don't know exists. The reason I
will upgrade is not for new features, as I have no idea if any of the
new features will benefit me. I suspect that most new features are of
more benefit to those who build business software or
19 matches
Mail list logo
