Speed of different versions of MC?

2013-02-12 Thread David Epstein
After years of using Metacard 2.5, I've started using LiveCode 4.5 and
5.5.3 as well as the the Metacard interface for those.  Particularly on my
older Mac (PowerPC chip System 10.4) I have noticed some significantly
slower operations with the newer versions.  Is this consistent with others'
experience?  And will stacks' performance as standalones tend to be roughly
similar to how they work in the development environment with which I
compile them?
I can see ways of speeding up certain handlers if I have to, but have been
spoiled by the raw power of Metacard 2.5, which meant that scripts simpler
to design but less efficient to parse would cause no detectible lag.
Many thanks for any thoughts.

David Epstein
___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard


Re: Speed of different versions of MC?

2013-02-12 Thread J. Landman Gay

On 2/12/13 12:19 PM, David Epstein wrote:

After years of using Metacard 2.5, I've started using LiveCode 4.5 and
5.5.3 as well as the the Metacard interface for those.  Particularly on my
older Mac (PowerPC chip System 10.4) I have noticed some significantly
slower operations with the newer versions.  Is this consistent with others'
experience?  And will stacks' performance as standalones tend to be roughly
similar to how they work in the development environment with which I
compile them?


I haven't noticed any differences, but I haven't had a PPC machine in 
years. Probably the only way to know if standalones are affected is to 
build one and see. Is there any pattern to the things that are slower? 
Maybe some of the many improvements since version 2.5 could handle those 
better.


--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software   | http://www.hyperactivesw.com

___
metacard mailing list
metacard@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/metacard