Jason,
I never called it a type three if you read my emails
although I am confident with the designation
scientists with decades of experience assigned it. I
am certainly no expert on the degree of metamorphism
determing petrologic types in chondrites so I will
present some notes collected from
http://www.rocksfromspace.org/December_1_2007.html
**Check out AOL's list of 2007's hottest
products.
(http://money.aol.com/special/hot-products-2007?NCID=aoltop000301)
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Hola Adam, All,
I never called it a type three if you read my emails
although I am confident with the designation
scientists with decades of experience assigned it.
Interestingly put. Well, I did read your emails, as well as those
posted by your brother, and, to be frank, although you don't
Relatively in the same general area of the sky, very diffuse, but still
visible in binoculars, Comet Holmes fades into astronomical history after
causing quite a stir and leaving us with a mystery.
Jerry Flaherty
Hi Jerry,
In fact it is still visible with the naked eye, even from downtown
Dear List,
As I posted earlier, there are 67 languages with
meteorite entries currently. This is the first time
in history that such a list has been compiled and will
be useful to researchers, field researchers,
linguists, writers, meteorite hunters and collectors,
and those searching for more
Okay, you've got 67. But you're only looking for another 168? Come on,
there are six or seven thousand languages currently spoken. How serious
are you? g
Chris
*
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
- Original Message
Chris,
I would suggest, you are the one who will write the list with the six or
seven thousand languages. ;)
Andi
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Chris
Peterson
Gesendet: Samstag, 1. Dezember 2007 17:49
An:
Andi and Chris,
A mountain cannot be climbed in a single step...it
takes a single step at a time. Yes, I know that there
are thousands of languages (wikipedia is working on
168 languages currently for their on-line wikinary).
I will do what I personally can and IF others are
willing to
Hi, Dirk, Chris, Andi, List,
Here is the list with the 6000+ languages!
The premiere reference on the World's languages,
covering 6912 languages, is to be found online at:
http://www.ethnologue.com/
in browse-able form. It contains a linguistic
description of each language but you cannot
search
Yesterday I sat down and did some cutting. I have a 3
kilo meteorite that looks somewhat like what I was
selling as the affectionately nicknamed BL meteorite
a couple years ago. I dont have any left to compare
but if anybody has some take a look at this:
Dean
You have the same as my NWA 2826 LL5 (aka NWA 2053 and many others)
This is very good material, fresh, with many interesting inclusions, visible
chondrules (thats why it should be LL5 not LL6) and very very large
troilites (well visible on photos at rusty spots)
-[ MARCIN CIMALA
--- PolandMET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dean
You have the same as my NWA 2826 LL5 (aka NWA 2053
and many others)
This is very good material, fresh, with many
interesting inclusions, visible
chondrules (thats why it should be LL5 not LL6) and
very very large
troilites (well visible on
--- PolandMET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dean
You have the same as my NWA 2826 LL5 (aka NWA 2053
and many others)
This is very good material, fresh, with many
interesting inclusions, visible
chondrules (thats why it should be LL5 not LL6) and
very very large
troilites (well visible on photos at
Dean,
It's too bad that we missed another chance to find out about those
fine-grained inclusions that are so prominent in the original BL, NWA
1658. I see they aren't mentioned in the classifications of NWA 2826 or
2053 either.
This week I will be sending several samples to Bathurst to try
--- Kashuba [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dean,
It's too bad that we missed another chance to find
out about those
fine-grained inclusions that are so prominent in the
original BL, NWA
1658. I see they aren't mentioned in the
classifications of NWA 2826 or
2053 either.
Yeah, those things
Dean,
Is your metal veined shocked material for sale. The 22.7 gram piece?
Cheers,
Mike Tettenborn
- Original Message -
From: dean bessey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2007 4:34 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Possible New BL
John,
Are you sending more 1685 to Bathurst?
I am hoping that Phil McCausland will be getting some results soon. I think
he now has more time to look at this stuff.
I was very impressed when I saw the centre piece in Meteorite magazine.
Beautiful and inspiring.
Cheers,
Mike Tettenborn
Several people have aksed how I cut meteorites into roughs for my sphere
I created a page that explains how I cut them into slices and I plan to
upload it tomorrow but i wanted some people to look at it first to give me
some feedback
You can see the page by clicking this:
Good late evening list.For all you iron lovers,have a
look on my homepage of my website.I aquired a 239 gram
mundrabilla piece that is at least 20 years old in a
trade.It still has all natural patina and has fusion
crust on one side.Also please notice the absolute
sculpted features on this.Simply
I dont want to get involved in the thread about what
the classification is (I will be pretty happy no
matter what the proposed options are) but can somebody
explain to me why its called a Fossil meteorite?
I realize that the term fossil can be loosely used
to describe pretty much any old stuff
Sterling wrote:
Rather than being an academic product, it is published
by SIL International, an organization that attempts
to translate The Bible into every language of man.
Despite their considerable linguistic efforts, the
group
has generated considerable controversy as well:
Hi,
As the old saying has it, I only know what I read
in the newspapers, or in this case the Wikipedia. The
Wiki URL quotes a set of accusations made in a recent
book and presents SIL's reply to those accusations as
well. I know no more about it than that, and I mentioned
it only in the
Hi, Dean,
I'm sure someone will have the paper and a
mountain of details, but the short-and-simple is:
it sat in a lake bottom which turned to a swamp
which turned to a pan and so forth as the Sahara
dried out and went from a wooded grassland with
lakes and rivers to a pocket edition of the
Hi Steve,
Any comments??
I think Mundrabilla is a little older than 20 years! Ohh... and the fusion
crust is long gone too! ;-) It's actually a nice representative piece of
Mundrabilla though!
Cheers,
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: steve arnold
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Listoids
Update of a sort...
Mirror website at http://www.qmig.net
let me know if youse finds any errors on the mirror that I need to webedit -
the webcounter points to the qmig.org domain until I get around to fixing
this...
This will allow me to have a website 24/7 especially since I am
25 matches
Mail list logo