Re: [meteorite-list] Chelyabinsk is not a impact-melt?

2015-02-23 Thread Anne Black via Meteorite-list
www.IMPACTIKA.com impact...@aol.com -Original Message- From: Frank Cressy To: Graham Ensor ; Anne Black Cc: meteorite list ; Michael Farmer Sent: Mon, Feb 23, 2015 8:24 am Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Chelyabinsk is not a impact-melt? Paragould also has a significant amount of melt breccia

Re: [meteorite-list] Chelyabinsk is not a impact-melt?

2015-02-23 Thread Graham Ensor via Meteorite-list
> www.IMPACTIKA.com > impact...@aol.com > > > -Original Message- > From: Michael Farmer via Meteorite-list > To: > > Sent: Sun, Feb 22, 2015 9:38 pm > Subject: [meteorite-list] Chelyabinsk is not a impact-melt? > > > Steve and Quinn Arnold are telling u

Re: [meteorite-list] Chelyabinsk is not a impact-melt?

2015-02-22 Thread Anne Black via Meteorite-list
A.com impact...@aol.com -Original Message- From: Michael Farmer via Meteorite-list To: Sent: Sun, Feb 22, 2015 9:38 pm Subject: [meteorite-list] Chelyabinsk is not a impact-melt? Steve and Quinn Arnold are telling us on Facebook that Chelyabinsk is not an impact-melt breccia, and that

[meteorite-list] Chelyabinsk is not a impact-melt?

2015-02-22 Thread Michael Farmer via Meteorite-list
Steve and Quinn Arnold are telling us on Facebook that Chelyabinsk is not an impact-melt breccia, and that Tony Irving confirms that. Is that true? Funny when I google it, hundreds of papers discuss the metric ton of known Chelyabinsk as all being impact-melt material. Of course, those of us who