Hi John,
NWA 4024 is indeed a nice example of the
discrepancy between Met. Bull. data and the
amount of stuff circulating on the market.
This is perfectly illustrated if you compare the
Met. Bull. write up regarding NWA 4024 an look at
the photos included at the end of the same report.
Hello Zelimir
This is perfectly illustrated if you compare the
Met. Bull. write up regarding NWA 4024 an look at
the photos included at the end of the same report.
There are some 15 pieces illustrated, coming from
various sources. Although weights are not
mentioned, a rough evaluation
Hello John, Zelimir, All,
I've held samples of both; NWA 4024 is indistinguishable from NWA 2680.
http://www.arizonaskiesmeteorites.com/AZ_Skies_Links/NWA_2680/index.html
http://www.meteoriteguy.com/catalog/nwa4024.htm
It was likely misidentified the second time around because the sample
sent
--- On Mon, 1/18/10, Thomas Webb webb...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Thomas Webb webb...@yahoo.com
Subject: [meteorite-list] Meteorite Pairing Discussions
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com, Martin Altmann
altm...@meteorite-martin.de
Date: Monday, January 18, 2010, 9:04 PM
List,
Martin
Hi Thomas, All,
You've brought up some good points. I had asked a similar question several
months ago but got mostly silence. Based on what was mentioned earlier, only
the stones that were originally collected and classified can be called NWA 869.
So like what Thomas said, all others should
List,
Martin wrote--
- Even if you're absolutely sure, that one of your stones is paired to one
or several existing NWA-numbers, you are not allowed in no case to use one
of these numbers.
I think I understand the reasoning behind what has been put forth in this
discussion so far and abide with
G'Day List
This has been a very interesting read. Quite some time ago, I brought up
the question about NWA 4024, which apparently on the card that
accompanied it and the Met Bull stated a TKW of 38.1g. But there's
definitely alot more out there ??? Is there pairing going on here?
7 matches
Mail list logo
