[meteorite-list] Siberian Impact Crater to be cored for ancient climate data

2009-01-03 Thread Mr EMan
Impact geology and subsequent paleoclimate in one package--El'gygytgyn Lake, in 
Siberia is 8 miles in diameter and lies within a 3.6 million year old(myo) 
impact crater.  A multinational team hopes to recover 3,000,000 years worth of 
ice and sediment cores from this lake plus impact breccia from the impact 
itself.

Eman

The Science Daily Link:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/12/081220084841.htm
The Article:
Under Frozen Lake In Siberia, Geoscientists Drill For Secrets Of Earth's 
Ancient Climate

ScienceDaily (Dec. 22, 2008) — In the next few days, a convoy of bulldozers and 
trucks will set out from a remote airport in Siberia, heading for a frozen lake 
62 miles north of the Arctic Circle, but the trip isn’t a holiday visit to the 
North Pole. Instead, the trucks will deliver core-drilling equipment for a 
study of sediment and meteorite-impact rocks that should provide the longest 
time-continuous climate record ever collected in the Arctic.

Once in place next month, the drilling will allow an international team of 
geoscientists led by Julie Brigham-Grette of the University of Massachusetts 
Amherst and Martin Melles of the University of Cologne, Germany, to burrow back 
in time, retrieving core samples more than 3 million years old and answering 
questions about Earth’s ancient past.

Almost impossibly remote, Lake El’gygytgyn (pronounced el’geegitgin),  
approximately 8 miles in diameter, was formed 3.6 million years ago when a 
monster meteor, more than a half-mile across, slammed into the Earth between 
the Arctic Ocean and the Bering Sea. Because this part of the Arctic was never 
covered by ice sheets or glaciers, it has received a steady drift of sediment – 
as much as a quarter mile (1,312 feet or 400 meters) deep – since impact. Thus, 
it offers a continuous depositional record unlike any other in the world, say 
Brigham-Grette and colleagues, beneath the crater lake that’s just over 560 
feet deep, equal to the height of the Washington Monument.

This week’s convoy will take 25 days to crawl through the frozen dark, building 
a 224-mile ice road as they go, over which the heavy drilling equipment can be 
moved from the remote airstrip at Pevek, in the north of Russia’s Chukotka 
Autonomous Region. “Lake El’gygytgyn is logistically among the most difficult 
places on Earth to carry out a scientific drilling program,” Brigham-Grette 
acknowledges. But by all accounts, the rewards should be worth all the effort.

In preparation for this day, scientists from institutes in Germany, Russia and 
Austria as well as UMass Amherst have been flying in by helicopter for focused 
tests over the past 10 years, drilling pilot cores and taking other samples and 
measurements. The site has passed every test. For example, the lake bed has 
been undisturbed by earthquakes, other underground shifting or drying for 
thousands of years. Pilot cores of 16.7 meters long (54 feet) have already 
provided a snapshot of climate from 300,000 years ago.

El’gygytgyn thus offers a truly unprecedented and ideal opportunity, 
Brigham-Grette notes, for piecing together a clearer picture of the 
hemisphere’s prehistoric climate and the dynamic processes of global climate 
change since the meteor’s impact. Notably, the researchers hope they can learn 
more about the unexplained shift from a warm forest ecology to permafrost, some 
2 million to 3 million years ago. Comparing cores from under Lake El’gygytgyn 
to those from lower latitudes will help the climate scientists with a 
high-resolution tool to study climatic change across northeast Asia “at 
millennial timescales,” Brigham-Grette says. In addition to climate data, cores 
may offer the researchers an opportunity to study the 3.6-million-year-old 
“impact breccia,” that is, how Earth’s bedrock responded to the meteor’s impact.

Some sampling began in November at the science camp drilling site on the 
lakeshore, where researchers will study the climate history of the permafrost 
(frozen ground) that surrounds the lake. The other two drill sites will be in 
the deepest part of the lake. Waiting until Arctic winter to transport and 
install the equipment, the team can use the frozen lake surface to support 
drills specially designed to withstand the extreme weather conditions. The 
scientists plan to start drilling overlapping cores at these frigid locations 
in February using the windswept lake ice as a drilling platform. Sampling will 
continue until May 2009, as part of the International Continental Scientific 
Drilling Program (ICDP).

To ensure the safety of both scientists and drill-team members on the isolated 
lake in potentially life-threatening conditions, Brigham-Grette and colleagues 
have scrutinized how the ice shifts, cracks, and responds to heavy wind and 
circulation forces before settling on rig placement. Workers and scientists 
will live in a protected personnel carrier that will also transport cores from 
the rig on the lake ice to the 

[meteorite-list] Rocks from Space Picture of the Day - January 3, 2009

2009-01-03 Thread Michael Johnson
http://www.rocksfromspace.org/January_3_2009.html 

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Carancas

2009-01-03 Thread Jerry Flaherty
I know in my heart that you are absolutely right Elton. But there are so few 
environments out here that can provide accessible search areas that it's my 
last hope of following in the footsteps of all of the List's exciting 
adventures.

I've even done some magnet snorkle dives driven by the tales recounted here.
I probably won't throw money into an expensive detector unless and until 
there is more evidence to support such ideas..
As far as kettle ponds are concerned, underlying terrain provides the 
pattern of these.

And yes, glacial deposits would overlay any evidence of impact.
However, my assumption, or hypothesis, considers the best case senerio or 
senerios. Either post glacial origin or other,  as yet to be undetermined, 
factors compromising glacial fill [tsunami, earthquake, and about the same 
luck as would be needed to win a lottery in picking the right pond, etc].
Thanks for the response. Always reassuring to be recognized, especially by 
someone as thoughtfully challanging as you.
P.S. google cattle pond in plymouth, ma, 02360. Note its shape. Instead of 
being shallow, it's quite deep. And oh yea, it's in my backyard.


- Original Message - 
From: Mr EMan mstrema...@yahoo.com
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com; Jerry Flaherty 
g...@verizon.net

Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 12:36 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Carancas


Hey stimulate the economy buy the detector and wetsuit and have at it, Jerry 
you might defeat the odds at that.


BUT of those 360+ natural ponds, at least 359 of them are kettle lakes with 
glacial origins..any impact pit/crater older than 8000-13,000 years would 
have been filled by glacial debris. Seems like a soil sampling auger would 
be more meaningful than a metal detector. Frankly, given a 300+ year Anglo 
history in New England, I'll further wager at least 359 of those ponds have 
iron in them anyway. I always hedge against the 6thSD outlier. The only way 
to know for sure is sample them all.


Elton

--- On Fri, 1/2/09, Jerry Flaherty g...@verizon.net wrote:
I live in Plymouth, MA, the land of 360 ponds, many of which are actually
moderate sized lakes..Thanks for the article Steve. An additional motivation 
to invest in an underwater detector to confirm or dispute my own personal 
suspisions about some of their origins.
Jerry Flaherty 


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] More on the Younger Dryas 'impact event'

2009-01-03 Thread Jerry Flaherty

Well balanced with an edge to the sympathetic.
- Original Message - 
From: Mark Crawford m...@meteorites.cc

To: Meteorite List meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 6:32 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] More on the Younger Dryas 'impact event'



http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7808171.stm

--
Mark's Meteorite Pages: http://meteorites.cc

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] meteor shower

2009-01-03 Thread Larry Twink Monrad
I was asked to post this to the list since the Bakers were unable to do so. 
Twink Monrad


1/3/2009

Does anyone on the list know if there is a current meteor shower?

Jake and I were out walking the dogs at 5:45 this morning and saw 7 or 8 
meteors.


There has been some activity every morning or evening for the last week or 
more. Our location is Show Low, Arizona, USA. Lat/Lon at our airport is



34-15-55N / 110-00-20W



The sightings have been almost over head, out of the NNE to NNW. The display 
is less than a second with a very flat arc.


2009 is going to be a great year having seen so many meteors in the first 
three days.


See you at Tucson.





Thanks.



Barb  Jake



__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] meteor shower

2009-01-03 Thread George Blahun Jr

Twink:
 It was the Quadrantid shower which peaked in the early morning  
today (5 am PST).


George
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Quadrantids

2009-01-03 Thread JoshuaTreeMuseum

Twink:

I was out at 6:00 a.m. putting wood in the greenhouse woodstove.  During the 
5 minute walk,   I saw 7 meteors.  The best viewing was supposed to be Out 
West,  but it looked pretty good here in northern Indiana.


Phil Whitmer 


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] meteor shower

2009-01-03 Thread lebofsky
Hi Twink:

Yes, got beat out on the response that it was the Quadrantids (radiates
out from a now-defunct constellation, Quadrans Muralis; mural or wall
quandrant). It also appears to be related to a 2-km asteroid, 2003 EH1.
However, going back even further, there is a lost comet, C/1490 Y1 (seen
in 1490) that may now look less comet-like and more asteroid-like, i.e.
EH1 is really a defunct comet.

Larry






On Sat, January 3, 2009 7:56 am, Larry  Twink Monrad wrote:
 I was asked to post this to the list since the Bakers were unable to do
 so. Twink Monrad


 1/3/2009


 Does anyone on the list know if there is a current meteor shower?


 Jake and I were out walking the dogs at 5:45 this morning and saw 7 or 8
 meteors.

 There has been some activity every morning or evening for the last week
 or more. Our location is Show Low, Arizona, USA. Lat/Lon at our
 airport is


 34-15-55N / 110-00-20W




 The sightings have been almost over head, out of the NNE to NNW. The
 display is less than a second with a very flat arc.

 2009 is going to be a great year having seen so many meteors in the first
  three days.

 See you at Tucson.






 Thanks.




 Barb  Jake




 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list




__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Pallasite vs. Mesosiderite

2009-01-03 Thread Michael Gilmer
Elton,

Well said.  That is a very coherent explanation of the differences
between the two.  With your permission only, I'd like to repost this
on the Cloudy Nights meteorite list.  If this is OK with you, email
me offlist.  :)

Best regards and clear skies,

MikeG


.
Michael Gilmer (Louisiana, USA)
Member of the Meteoritical Society.
Member of the Bayou Region Stargazers Network.
Websites - http://www.galactic-stone.com and http://www.glassthrower.com
MySpace - http://www.myspace.com/fine_meteorites_4_sale
..


Message: 2
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 23:03:39 -0800 (PST)
From: Mr EMan mstrema...@yahoo.com
Subject: [meteorite-list] Pallasite vs. Mesosiderite
To: metlist meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Message-ID: 262076.5974...@web55208.mail.re4.yahoo.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

This is a lost draft regarding the question about pallesites vs mesosiderites 
in the for what it is worth category.

These two types of meteorites were trasditionally lumped together for a very 
long long time as stony-irons.   We know now they have little in common 
chemically nor in point of origin. 

Two examples that can appear similar are Huckitta; a pallasite and Vaca Muerta; 
a mesosiderite. Given that they were widely available stony irons that happened 
to superficially resemble each other owing to extensive weathering.  This 
perpetuated the misconception that they were related, IMO. 

Pallasites contain the mineral assemblage magnesium iron silicate with the 
formula (Mg,Fe)2SiO4.aka olivine wich is a mixture of the minerals forresterite 
and fayalite. In fact a pallasite vs mesosiderite distinction is the silicate 
in pallasites are olivine (Mg,Fe)2SiO4,  where the mesosiderite's pyroxene 
silicates are mostly XY(Si,Al)2O6

I do not know for sure I am fairly certain that notuing more than a trace of 
olivine--neither massive or  pallasite-like olivine crystals have been found 
in mesosiderites.

All mesosiderites have been linked to a single parent body totally disrupted 
both with extensively intermixed strata.  Mesosiderites are an assemblage of 
iron, eucrite, diogenite, impact melt breccia, howardite soup--you name it.  By 
disrupted I mean really comingled with lots of surface and mantle material shot 
through the center and into the other side, flash melting, biblical porportions 
of chaos crumbled up silicates with iron chunks for flavor mixing.

Pallasites represent a less mixed, none-the-less disrupted parent body-- 
specifically, material from the mantle core boundary*. The olivine within the 
metal portions was emplaced in the iron via a yet to be confirmed process. 
Possible via a cumulate condensation or a impact imparted sloshing of a magma 
chamber in contact with the molten core.   Because there are Widmanstatten 
patterns in pallasites we know that whatever the process, it wasn't the one 
that excavated the meteorites from the core of the parent body because rapid 
cooling would not allow those patterns to form.

Some recent finds show entire sections void of olivine crystals all together ( 
hence siderite portions).  I haven't looked it up recently but unlike a 
single parent in mesosiderites there are 7-13 separate parent bodies sampled in 
the worlds sampling of pallasites.

AS mentioned before, very weathered pallesites can supreficially resemble 
mesosiderites such as is the case with Huckitta. Almost everyone owns some 
Huckitta which dosen't look at all like a typical pallasite.  Much of the 
Huckitta in private collections is not the pristeen olivine metal mix we know 
so well but oxiadized metal and hydrated silicates. It looks like a meso in 
many appearance respects. Couple this with the availability of Vaca Muerta and 
in absence of anything else for comparrison  and it is easy to see why anyone 
would assume they were very related.

Elton
* there is a theory about iron pools/pockets not at the core of asteroids but 
those are hard to explain rotationaly etc.





  
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] AD Encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com website for sale

2009-01-03 Thread Pelé Pierre-Marie
Hello List Members,

My new work doesn't allow me to keep working on the
Encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com website as I would like
to.  I can't make the updates and make new features
available.

So I'm selling my domain name
encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com and of course the
account and the complete website. That's the only way
for the website to be continued and updated.

What you get ?
--
- You get the domain name
encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com
- You get a website with over 1,100 members
- You get a Starter account at uplinkearth.com with
3GB disk space, 2 domains possible, and much more
(follow this link for more info : 
http://uplinkearth.com/hosting_packages.html)
- You get a complete DVD with a backup of the website

Who can buy it ?
--
Anybody of course but I would really like it is an
IMCA member or a well-known meteorite collector to
keep a high level of quality.
Also, you have to have a good programming skill if you
wish to maintain the website working or have a friend
as programmer (it's programmed with ASP and an MS
Access database) ; I won't have time to help the new
owner.

How to buy it ?
--
I'll start a sealed auction. Principle is nobody sees
the bid of others and, on January 31st, 2009, midnight
(Paris time), I'll stop the bids and warn the winner.
Of course, as all bids are hidden, you just make one
bid !

The starting price is US$500. I think it's a fair
starting price as I worked hundreds of hours on the
website and you get a complete website with
possibilities of advertising and cross-selling. I'm
sure the price gets high so make a good offer to win
it.

BIDDING TIME STARTS NOW !

I'll help the winner to make the transfers with my
provider uplinkearth.com

How to pay ?
--
Payment will only be done with PAYPAL in US$ just
after the end of bidding.

I thank you for reading,

Pierre-Marie PELE


  

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] AD - pict of small thin lunar slices added!

2009-01-03 Thread Peter Marmet
Hello All,

I just added a pict of a few smaller slices of the stunning LUNAR NWA 4734.
The discount price of $ 950.00 per gram is guaranteed until January 5, 2009.
After January 5, the price will be $ 1200.00 per gram.

Five smaller slices are available:  25 mg, 75 mg, 82 mg, 110 mg, 128 mg

http://www.marmet-meteorites.com/id44.html


Thank you,
Peter

Peter Marmet
Bern, Switzerland
IMCA #2747
p.mar...@mysunrise.ch
http://www.marmet-meteorites.com/
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Happy New Year

2009-01-03 Thread Bob Evans

Top all those concerned,
If you arent concerned please delete.

Iam in no way trying to start any arguments on this list.
But these people are way out of line.

Phil Whitmer wrote on 12/30/08 :
A respected and important member of the meteorite community checked out the
provenance of the last offerings on eBay by Bob Evans and they turned out to
be shady to say the least. It looks like Bob Evans was selling stones with
fake Monnig provenance according to his own source. 

You people had better get your facts straight. I haven't sold anything that 
came from Monnig in years. I think some of you people don't even know what 
my ebay account is.

Here is my account :
http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZmaccers531

Al Mitterling, Iam seriously considering a lawsuit against you for slander.




__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Freebie Taken!

2009-01-03 Thread Michael Gilmer
Hi folks!

Both freebies are now taken - in a record time of about 2 minutes! 

Best regards to everyone and Happy New Year!

MikeG




- Original Message -
From: Michael Gilmer michael_w_gil...@yahoo.com
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2009 9:33 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] New Year Freebie - Move Quick!


 Hi Listees!

 To celebrate the coming of 2009, I am offering a mystery freebie
 meteorite to the first two CONUS residents to who respond to this
 post.

 I am giving away a free stony meteorite and a free iron meteorite.

 Both are small, but are quite nice for their small size.

 The first responder will get their choice of stone or iron.

 The second responder will get the other specimen not taken by responder
 #1.

 This offer is open to CONUS residents only.

 If I get a flood of responses, I will reply to the winners of the
 freebies, and will post a stop notice to the list to let everyone
 else know that the freebies are taken.

 Happy New Year and clear skies! :)

 MikeG

 .
 Michael Gilmer (Louisiana, USA)
 Member of the Meteoritical Society.
 Member of the Bayou Region Stargazers Network.
 Websites - http://www.galactic-stone.com and http://www.glassthrower.com
 MySpace - http://www.myspace.com/fine_meteorites_4_sale
 ..


.
Michael Gilmer (Louisiana, USA)
Member of the Meteoritical Society.
Member of the Bayou Region Stargazers Network.
Websites - http://www.galactic-stone.com and http://www.glassthrower.com
MySpace - http://www.myspace.com/fine_meteorites_4_sale
..



--- On Thu, 1/1/09, meteorite-list-requ...@meteoritecentral.com 
meteorite-list-requ...@meteoritecentral.com wrote:

 From: meteorite-list-requ...@meteoritecentral.com 
 meteorite-list-requ...@meteoritecentral.com
 Subject: Meteorite-list Digest, Vol 64, Issue 1
 To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Thursday, January 1, 2009, 11:00 AM
 Send Meteorite-list mailing list submissions to
   meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 
 To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
   http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 or, via email, send a message with subject or body
 'help' to
   meteorite-list-requ...@meteoritecentral.com
 
 You can reach the person managing the list at
   meteorite-list-ow...@meteoritecentral.com
 
 When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
 specific
 than Re: Contents of Meteorite-list digest...
 
 
 Today's Topics:
 
1. Re: Fun questions, or public FAQs (al mitterling)
2. Re: Fun questions, or public FAQs (al mitterling)
3. Fun questions, or public FAQs (JoshuaTreeMuseum)
4. Re: Fun questions, or public FAQs (Don Merchant)
5. Dawn Journal - December 30, 2008 (Ron Baalke)
6. Astronomy Picture of the Day 2008 December 31 (Roman)
7. Re: Update on New England Fireball of 12-29-08 (Jerry
 Flaherty)
8. Re: Astronomy Picture of the Day 2008 December 31
 (Jerry Flaherty)
9. Rocks from Space Picture of the Day - January 1,2009
   (Michael Johnson)
   10. Re: Tucson Show Auction now up (Michael L
 Blood)
   11. AD - ebay auctions ending soon (Meteoriteshow)
   12. Re: Rocks from Space Picture of the Day - January   1,
 2009
   (Jerry Flaherty)
   13. happy new everyone (steve arnold)
 
 
 --
 
 Message: 1
 Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:25:46 -0500
 From: al mitterling alm...@kconline.com
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Fun questions, or public FAQs
 To: Mark Crawford
 m...@meteorites.cc, Meteorite List
   meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Message-ID:
 8c7c4ae6b10f49ee8debce1312cdf...@starmanpc
 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed;
 charset=iso-8859-1;
   reply-type=response
 
 Hi Mark and all,
 
 One thing I didn't realize for a long time was peoples
 preception of part 
 slices and small fragments that many of us dealers sort of
 take for granted. 
 One lady commented to me one time that she was amazed that
 they could find 
 such a small crumb of Mars I had in my micro mounts (it was
 Zagami). It then 
 dawned on me that some people see these small micros and
 think that was the 
 whole piece found. I explained that it was from a much
 larger specimen that 
 was cut and broke down to sell to micro collectors and that
 it would be 
 really tough to test such a small piece as it would be
 mostly consumed and 
 nothing left for sale.
 
 I have had other people comment on slices saying they sure
 are flat looking, 
 not knowing they are looking at a slice being sold from a
 whole stone. Sure 
 there are other misconceptions when they are looking but
 now know to let 
 them know the small pieces and slices are cut from much
 larger specimens. 
 Best!!
 
 

Re: [meteorite-list] meteor shower

2009-01-03 Thread Kashuba
Larry,

Thanks for the extra info on the Quadrantids.  It's good hearing from the
asteroid expert.  

- John

-Original Message-
From: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of
lebof...@lpl.arizona.edu
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 7:45 AM
To: Larry  Twink Monrad
Cc: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] meteor shower

Hi Twink:

Yes, got beat out on the response that it was the Quadrantids (radiates
out from a now-defunct constellation, Quadrans Muralis; mural or wall
quandrant). It also appears to be related to a 2-km asteroid, 2003 EH1.
However, going back even further, there is a lost comet, C/1490 Y1 (seen
in 1490) that may now look less comet-like and more asteroid-like, i.e.
EH1 is really a defunct comet.

Larry






On Sat, January 3, 2009 7:56 am, Larry  Twink Monrad wrote:
 I was asked to post this to the list since the Bakers were unable to do
 so. Twink Monrad


 1/3/2009


 Does anyone on the list know if there is a current meteor shower?


 Jake and I were out walking the dogs at 5:45 this morning and saw 7 or 8
 meteors.

 There has been some activity every morning or evening for the last week
 or more. Our location is Show Low, Arizona, USA. Lat/Lon at our
 airport is


 34-15-55N / 110-00-20W




 The sightings have been almost over head, out of the NNE to NNW. The
 display is less than a second with a very flat arc.

 2009 is going to be a great year having seen so many meteors in the first
  three days.

 See you at Tucson.






 Thanks.




 Barb  Jake




 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list




__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] AD Encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com website for sale

2009-01-03 Thread matt
This is sad news, Pierre has done an amazing job with the 
encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com site. I consider it the single most useful 
meteorite site on the net (just my personal opinion, no offense to others. David 
Weir's site is certainly up there too).


It seemed a labour of love for Pierre, and although he sold advertising this was 
always restrained and never excessive. He clearly has the right to sell the 
site, and I hope he gets a fair price for the considerable (and most likely 
thankless) efforts he has made. That said, I'm concerned that the auction may 
only interest people with commercial motives. The more they spend, the more they 
may feel the need to recoup, which could be highly detrimental to the site in 
general.


A second concern would be the purchaser getting access to a great deal of 
information regarding other peoples collections and the email addresses of 1100 
collectors. I wonder how many people have listed a lot of their collection on 
the site? Although they may have pieces set to invisible to the public, the site 
owner (and anybody else with database access) can see them. I recall spaces for 
the dealer that a stone was purchased from, dates and prices. I always limited 
the info I placed on the site regarding my own collection anyway, but I'll be 
removing what I have entered in the database before it's sold. I can think of 
several ways access to this information may be abused, I trusted Pierre, I 
wouldn't necessarily be as trusting of the new owner (again, I'm not suggesting 
anybody in our community would abuse this position, just that the possibility 
exists).


Hopefully the site will be bought by somebody with exactly the same 
philanthropic approach as Pierre demonstrated during his years of hard work on 
the site. A HUGE thank-you to Pierre for his work to date, and I'll be keeping 
my fingers crossed for the site's future...


Matt.

Pelé Pierre-Marie wrote:

Hello List Members,

My new work doesn't allow me to keep working on the
Encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com website as I would like
to.  I can't make the updates and make new features
available.

So I'm selling my domain name
encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com and of course the
account and the complete website. That's the only way
for the website to be continued and updated.

What you get ?
--
- You get the domain name
encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com
- You get a website with over 1,100 members
- You get a Starter account at uplinkearth.com with
3GB disk space, 2 domains possible, and much more
(follow this link for more info : 
http://uplinkearth.com/hosting_packages.html)

- You get a complete DVD with a backup of the website

Who can buy it ?
--
Anybody of course but I would really like it is an
IMCA member or a well-known meteorite collector to
keep a high level of quality.
Also, you have to have a good programming skill if you
wish to maintain the website working or have a friend
as programmer (it's programmed with ASP and an MS
Access database) ; I won't have time to help the new
owner.

How to buy it ?
--
I'll start a sealed auction. Principle is nobody sees
the bid of others and, on January 31st, 2009, midnight
(Paris time), I'll stop the bids and warn the winner.
Of course, as all bids are hidden, you just make one
bid !

The starting price is US$500. I think it's a fair
starting price as I worked hundreds of hours on the
website and you get a complete website with
possibilities of advertising and cross-selling. I'm
sure the price gets high so make a good offer to win
it.

BIDDING TIME STARTS NOW !

I'll help the winner to make the transfers with my
provider uplinkearth.com

How to pay ?
--
Payment will only be done with PAYPAL in US$ just
after the end of bidding.

I thank you for reading,

Pierre-Marie PELE


  


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] AD Encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com website forsale

2009-01-03 Thread Mike Bandli
Hello Pierre-Marie,

I am sorry to hear that you won't have the time to maintain the Encyclopedia
of Meteorites. I understand it is a tremendous task keeping it all up to
date and appreciate the hundreds of hours of personal time you have put in
to it. I certainly could not do it! I have always preferred the EOM over the
MetBull Database and hope that, for the most part, the new owner of the EOM
keeps things the same and take great care in the transfer of information. In
my opinion, there's really nothing to fix.

Thanks again for this most valuable and free resource. I really appreciate
it!

Best regards,

Mike Bandli

-Original Message-
From: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Pelé
Pierre-Marie
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 9:38 AM
To: MeteoriteList
Subject: [meteorite-list] AD Encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com website forsale


Hello List Members,

My new work doesn't allow me to keep working on the
Encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com website as I would like
to.  I can't make the updates and make new features
available.

So I'm selling my domain name
encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com and of course the
account and the complete website. That's the only way
for the website to be continued and updated.


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Quadrantids 2009

2009-01-03 Thread bernd . pauli
Barb and Jake wrote:

Jake and I were out walking the dogs at 5:45 this morning and saw 7 or 8 
meteors

George responded:

It was the Quadrantid shower which peaked in the early morning today (5 am 
PST)

Phil added:

I was out at 6:00 a.m. ... During the 5 minute walk, I saw 7 meteors


Hello All,

See also S  T, Jan 2009, pp. 71-72 (excerpt): The Peekaboo Quadrantids

The Quad shower is elusive because it's brief. At its peak it can produce
120 or more meteors visible per hour ..., but the peak lasts just a few
hours at most.

This year the peak is ... ideal for western North America, where the time is 5 
a.m.
PST before the first light of dawn.

Best wishes,

Bernd



__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Wanted to Buy : Catalogue of Meteorites by Grady

2009-01-03 Thread Michael Gilmer
Hi friends and listees!

I am looking for a copy of Monica Grady's Catalogue of Meteorites.

The reason I am posting here, and not buying it directly from an online
book vendor, is because I am looking for a *bargain* copy.

Ideally, I'd like to find a copy with some cosmetic issues that would
lower the price a bit.  It can be any edition - even an older one
with the cover torn off and big coffee stain on page 263.

If you have a copy that fits this description, then contact me
offlist.  I also do trades and have a collection with over 50 
localities and oodles of UNWA - so I can do a partial trade with
cash for the book if this sounds interesting.

email - m...@galactic-stone.com

Thanks for looking and clear skies!

MikeG

.
Michael Gilmer (Louisiana, USA)
Member of the Meteoritical Society.
Member of the Bayou Region Stargazers Network.
Websites - http://www.galactic-stone.com and http://www.glassthrower.com
MySpace - http://www.myspace.com/fine_meteorites_4_sale
..




  
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] AD Encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com website for sale

2009-01-03 Thread Pelé Pierre-Marie
Hello Matt and other List Members,

you're right about your interrogations for privacy of
the information included in the Encyclopedia of
Meteorites.

I won't be able to keep an eye on the new owner but I
wish he's a smart and respectful person who won't use
these information for his business.

When the bids are over on january 31st, I'll speak to
the new owner and explain what the users are waiting
from him. 

But that's all I can do.

If we want the EOM website to live, I've to sell it
because I really can't update it anymore (it takes
several hours a month). The EOM is useful if it's
updated...

Pierre



  

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] AD Encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com website for sale

2009-01-03 Thread Michael L Blood
Greetings Pierre and all,
Pierre, I was concerned about your comment of hoping
The new owner is not a meteorite dealer who would benefit
From the web site personally in any way.
Being a dealer puts one in a position to contribute to the
meteoritic community and not just be some kind of blood sucking
leach! 
In fact, most of the dealers I know are major contributors to the
community  some are truly outstanding in giving of their time  energy,
Such as Anne Black, Adam Hupe - all the dealers who have served
On the IMCA board (that is a LOT of work, folks), Paul Harris  Jim
Tobin (Meteorite Times, Most of their Meteorite Exchange web
Site), etc, etc. 
Of course there are many pure collectors who have also contributed
plenty. The point is, any conscientious individual would be fine (I have
No personal interest, myself). Just because someone makes money dealing
meteorites does not mean they can't serve the meteoritic community as well.
Most dealers do - some more than others. ALL of them have to make
Money, as well, but these two things are in no way in conflict, even
Though a few dealers have made their own beds that way.
Best wishes to all, Michael

on 1/3/09 1:50 PM, Pelé Pierre-Marie at pierremariep...@yahoo.fr wrote:

 Hello Matt and other List Members,
 
 you're right about your interrogations for privacy of
 the information included in the Encyclopedia of
 Meteorites.
 
 I won't be able to keep an eye on the new owner but I
 wish he's a smart and respectful person who won't use
 these information for his business.
 
 When the bids are over on january 31st, I'll speak to
 the new owner and explain what the users are waiting
 from him. 
 
 But that's all I can do.
 
 If we want the EOM website to live, I've to sell it
 because I really can't update it anymore (it takes
 several hours a month). The EOM is useful if it's
 updated...
 
 Pierre
 
 
 
   
 
 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Get 30% to 50% more gas mileage immediately (I did!):
http://go4best.water4gas.hop.clickbank.net/







__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Re : the new fall contunue// tichka mountains

2009-01-03 Thread habibi abdelaziz

hello all;
some news from this mountain tichka fall,
most of the stone found are broken they smash the mountain and the meteorite 
hit rocks of the mountain , and the result meteorite have not the time to 
refresh and it become cold fastly so it gives weathered and no crusts meteorite 
many broken stone and many uncrusted meteorite  so for the oriented or the 
complete it will be rare,
thanks
aziz habibi

--- On Fri, 1/2/09, habibi abdelaziz azizhab...@yahoo.com wrote:

 From: habibi abdelaziz azizhab...@yahoo.com
 Subject: [meteorite-list] the  new fall contunue// tichka mountains
 To: meteorite list meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Friday, January 2, 2009, 4:31 PM
 hi again
 just a short note to say,
 that there is may be many kilos found and there is a fight
 for it,split on 3 places,an area of more than 4000 km
 square.
 taddart tahanout and tichka , could be more places as far
 as things goes we will hear defenitly tomorow of the
 aproximate amount of kilo's,
 the center of the fall is may be tichka mountain full of
 snow now, according to the fireball and the sonic boum its
 big.
 it become from houre to houre sur that its sur that the
 sample i get is from the new fall;
 
 my best
 aziz habibi
 
  font style=BACKGROUND-COLOR:#40;
 face=comic sans mshabibi aziz 
 box 70 erfoud 52200 morroco 
 phone. 21235576145 
 fax.21235576170/font 
 
 
      
 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



  
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] AD Encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com website for sale

2009-01-03 Thread Mark Crawford

Whoa, Michael :)

Pierre said he hoped it wouldn't be purchased by someone who would use 
the information for his business - which isn't the same as saying not 
to a dealer. In fact, in the original posting, he explicitly said he'd 
prefer to sell to an IMCA member or a well-known meteorite dealer.  So 
I don't think it's fair to characterise his post as you did.


A bigger question is data protection and copyright. There's no question 
Pierre can sell the domain and his web code, but the info in the 
database belongs to those who have submitted it. Same applies to the 
extensive images stored there. I think it's reasonable to insist that 
the new owner (curator?) respects our copyright and doesn't use the 
images/data for commercial ends without prior permission.


Mark

Michael L Blood wrote:

Greetings Pierre and all,
Pierre, I was concerned about your comment of hoping
The new owner is not a meteorite dealer who would benefit
From the web site personally in any way.
Being a dealer puts one in a position to contribute to the
meteoritic community and not just be some kind of blood sucking
leach! 



--
Mark's Meteorite Pages: http://meteorites.cc

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] More on the Younger Dryas 'impact event'

2009-01-03 Thread E.P. Grondine
Hi - 
 
Dr. Morrison is being disingenious. If you have a fragmented comet, and we've 
all seen them, then you end up with multiple comet fragments hitting - and 
we've all seen that as well.

I wonder what year the impactite layer from Sandusky with the blast killed 
mega-fauna will actually get reported

E.P. Grondine
Man and Impact in the Americas

Well balanced with an edge to the sympathetic.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7808171.stm




  
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] More on the Younger Dryas 'impact event'

2009-01-03 Thread tracy latimer

We have an accepted cosmic airburst event in recent history -- has anyone found 
substantial numbers of nanodiamonds as a result of Tunguska?  If (compared to 
'normal' background quantities) more were found in that area and could be 
linked to the airburst/impact, that would help substantiate nanodiamond 
deposits as an indicator.  For that matter, what about comparing it to other 
confirmed mega-impact areas?  Do the impactite layers also contain elevated 
levels of iridium?  There are other markers that could bolster this theory.
 
Tracy Latimer


 Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 15:27:52 -0800
 From: epgrond...@yahoo.com
 To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] More on the Younger Dryas 'impact event'

 Hi -

 Dr. Morrison is being disingenious. If you have a fragmented comet, and we've 
 all seen them, then you end up with multiple comet fragments hitting - and 
 we've all seen that as well.

 I wonder what year the impactite layer from Sandusky with the blast killed 
 mega-fauna will actually get reported

 E.P. Grondine
 Man and Impact in the Americas

Well balanced with an edge to the sympathetic.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7808171.stm





 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
_
It’s the same Hotmail®. If by “same” you mean up to 70% faster.
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_broad1_122008
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Mars Odyssey THEMIS Images: Dec 29, 2008 - Jan 2, 2009

2009-01-03 Thread Ron Baalke

MARS ODYSSEY THEMIS IMAGES
December 29, 2008 - January 2, 2009

o Channel (Released 29 December 2008)
  http://themis.asu.edu/zoom-20081229a

o Volcanic Vent (Released 30 December 2008)
  http://themis.asu.edu/zoom-20081230a

o Volcanic Vent (Released 31 December 2008)
  http://themis.asu.edu/zoom-20081231a

o Volcanic Vent (Released 01 January 2009)
  http://themis.asu.edu/zoom-20090101a

o Polar Textures (Released 02 January 2009)
  http://themis.asu.edu/zoom-20090102a
k

All of the THEMIS images are archived here:

http://themis.asu.edu/latest.html

NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory manages the 2001 Mars Odyssey mission 
for NASA's Office of Space Science, Washington, D.C. The Thermal Emission 
Imaging System (THEMIS) was developed by Arizona State University,
Tempe, in co.oration with Raytheon Santa Barbara Remote Sensing. 
The THEMIS investigation is led by Dr. Philip Christensen at Arizona State 
University. Lockheed Martin Astronautics, Denver, is the prime contractor 
for the Odyssey project, and developed and built the orbiter. Mission 
operations are conducted jointly from Lockheed Martin and from JPL, a 
division of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena. 



__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

2009-01-03 Thread Michael Gilmer

Hi Listees,

I have a quick question for the group - why are some falls not referred
to as hammers ?

For example, Allende and Holbrook are rarely referred to as hammers, 
but there are reports that both hit rooftops and other manmade 
structures.  Both falls are generally referred to as historical but
rarely as hammers.  Is there a reason?  Is it because the historical
element outweighs the hammer element in these cases?  Claxton is
well known as a hammer, but historically-speaking it's otherwise
unremarkable.  Is this simply semantics at play, or is there some
kind of formula at work?

Regards and clear skies,

MikeG

PS - Michael Blood, please email me offlist. 

.
Michael Gilmer (Louisiana, USA)
Member of the Meteoritical Society.
Member of the Bayou Region Stargazers Network.
Websites - http://www.galactic-stone.com and http://www.glassthrower.com
MySpace - http://www.myspace.com/fine_meteorites_4_sale
..




  
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

2009-01-03 Thread Darren Garrison
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 16:32:06 -0800 (PST), you wrote:

Is this simply semantics at play

Yes. 

The concern with hammers is a small subset of what is already a small
community of collectors.  

The only true measure of wherther something is a hammer is the level of
legitness.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cdk1gwWH-Cg
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

2009-01-03 Thread Dave Gheesling
Darren, Michael  All,
Semantics are absolutely at play -- and this is a roughly defined element
of meteorite collecting at best -- but I'd beg to differ with them being of
concern to a small subset of what is already a small community of
collectors.  Hammers (I think Blood may have introduced this term to the
meteorite world, though Johnny Carson ficticiously used it well prior to
that in Niven and Pournelle's Lucifer's Hammer to describe a forthcoming
comet strike upon the Earth...p. 78, paperback) are a huge element of the
international collector base, and one need only take a casual glance at
market prices to see this is true.  I'm not a hammer collector by any means,
but I've seen repeatedly in educational outreach work that there is a
broader based appeal for such stories.  They connect with virtually
everyone, though amino acids in Murchison, while much more interesting to
most of us here, do not.  Further, our brains can't easily comprehend an
entry velocity of 20 mps, but a car struck by a rock from space that was
still travelling 200 - 300 mph -- well, everyone gets that.  The term
hammer has been overused virtually to the point of ridiculous (what makes
them truly interesting -- the main mass hitting the only mailbox ever, or a
small individual striking a piece of railing on a mile-long fence?).  For
the term to survive, my sense is that there should be some dilineation
between a Hammer Stone and a Hammer Fall.  Sylacauga is a wonderful story,
but the material available to collectors didn't hit Mrs. Hodges on the hip.
Associating all fallen individuals as hammers in conjunction with a single
or few individuals out of 150 kg worth that actually hit something is also a
bit of a stretch.  Lastly, to my earlier point re: market pricing, the
argument that not all of them are priced similarly is for the most part
(though certainly not entirely) washed away by a look at respective TKWs.
Two cents worth...
All best,
Dave
www.fallingrocks.com 

-Original Message-
From: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Darren
Garrison
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 7:40 PM
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 16:32:06 -0800 (PST), you wrote:

Is this simply semantics at play

Yes. 

The concern with hammers is a small subset of what is already a small
community of collectors.  

The only true measure of wherther something is a hammer is the level of
legitness.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cdk1gwWH-Cg
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

2009-01-03 Thread Jeff Kuyken

Hi Michael,

There's another way to look at it too. The two falls you mentioned were 
massive and there were thousands of individual stones. In my opinion it's 
only a hammer if the individual stone actually hit something. For example 
you can't really say that the whole Allende fall was a hammer if only a 
couple of stones hit things. I guess it comes down to provenance too. Many 
of the good dealer/hunters these days get proof of where particular stones 
hit when chasing a fresh fall. In my opinion Thuathe was one of the best 
cataloged falls with MANY individual stones precisely recorded by both 
researchers and hunters alike.


Cheers,

Jeff



- Original Message - 
From: Michael Gilmer michael_w_gil...@yahoo.com

To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2009 11:32 AM
Subject: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?




Hi Listees,

I have a quick question for the group - why are some falls not referred
to as hammers ?

For example, Allende and Holbrook are rarely referred to as hammers,
but there are reports that both hit rooftops and other manmade
structures.  Both falls are generally referred to as historical but
rarely as hammers.  Is there a reason?  Is it because the historical
element outweighs the hammer element in these cases?  Claxton is
well known as a hammer, but historically-speaking it's otherwise
unremarkable.  Is this simply semantics at play, or is there some
kind of formula at work?

Regards and clear skies,

MikeG

PS - Michael Blood, please email me offlist.

.
Michael Gilmer (Louisiana, USA)
Member of the Meteoritical Society.
Member of the Bayou Region Stargazers Network.
Websites - http://www.galactic-stone.com and http://www.glassthrower.com
MySpace - http://www.myspace.com/fine_meteorites_4_sale
..





__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list




__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

2009-01-03 Thread MeteorHntr
In a message dated 1/3/2009 7:56:11 P.M. Central  Standard Time, 
d...@fallingrocks.com writes:
Sylacauga is a wonderful  story,
but the material available to collectors didn't hit Mrs. Hodges on the  hip.

Dave,

In 1999 I brokered a couple of pieces of Sylacaga from  the King Collection 
that did indeed come from the stone that hit Mrs.  Hodges.  It came from a core 
sample taken from that very stone.   Somehow Dr. King talked them (the local 
library or museum)  into taking a  small core sample from it, maybe he traded 
them some Allende for it.

I  think most of what is on the market of Sylacaga came from the King piece, 
but  check the provenance.  If the slices are round, or partially round on one 
 edge, it is probably from that core piece.

Steve Arnold #1  

**New year...new news.  Be the first to know what is making 
headlines. (http://www.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntaolcom0026)
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

2009-01-03 Thread Darren Garrison
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 20:53:24 -0500, you wrote:

but I'd beg to differ with them being of
concern to a small subset of what is already a small community of
collectors.  

With no solid numbers whatsoever to back me up, I'd bet that there were far more
people actively collecting and concerned about tag variants on Beeny Babies at
their height than have ever even HEARD of a hammer meteorite.  
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

2009-01-03 Thread John.L.Cabassi

12 inches of hickory, 5 ounces of steel.   Sorry, couldn't resist.  ;-)

John

- Original Message - 
From: Darren Garrison cyna...@charter.net

To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 6:10 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?



On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 20:53:24 -0500, you wrote:


but I'd beg to differ with them being of
concern to a small subset of what is already a small community of
collectors.


With no solid numbers whatsoever to back me up, I'd bet that there were 
far more
people actively collecting and concerned about tag variants on Beeny 
Babies at

their height than have ever even HEARD of a hammer meteorite.
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

2009-01-03 Thread Dave Gheesling
Hi, Steve,
Well, pardon my ignorance, and I stand corrected.  Apparently quickly picked
a bad example, as I'm familiar with slices in private circulation that
aren't as you described.  That said, I am familiar with some material which
is exactly as you've described it, so that makes sense.  Anyway, hopefully
the concept came through even though the example was a poor choice.  How
about Mbale?
All best, and Happy New Year,
Dave
www.fallingrocks.com 

-Original Message-
From: meteorh...@aol.com [mailto:meteorh...@aol.com] 
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 9:04 PM
To: d...@fallingrocks.com; cyna...@charter.net;
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

In a message dated 1/3/2009 7:56:11 P.M. Central  Standard Time,
d...@fallingrocks.com writes:
Sylacauga is a wonderful  story,
but the material available to collectors didn't hit Mrs. Hodges on the  hip.

Dave,

In 1999 I brokered a couple of pieces of Sylacaga from  the King Collection
that did indeed come from the stone that hit Mrs.  Hodges.  It came from a
core 
sample taken from that very stone.   Somehow Dr. King talked them (the local

library or museum)  into taking a  small core sample from it, maybe he
traded them some Allende for it.

I  think most of what is on the market of Sylacaga came from the King piece,
but  check the provenance.  If the slices are round, or partially round on
one  edge, it is probably from that core piece.

Steve Arnold #1  

**New year...new news.  Be the first to know what is making
headlines. (http://www.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntaolcom0026)

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

2009-01-03 Thread Dave Gheesling
Darren,
I thought you meant to say the community of hammer collectors within the
meteorite collecting community was small -- relative to the international
meteorite collecting community itself.  Apologies for missing that...my bad.
Many serious meteorite collectors look down their noses at hammer
collectors, and that's where I thought you were going.  Either way, an
interesting thread on a seriously vaguely defined aspect of meteorite
collecting...
All best,
Dave
www.fallingrocks.com 

-Original Message-
From: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Darren
Garrison
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 9:10 PM
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 20:53:24 -0500, you wrote:

but I'd beg to differ with them being of concern to a small subset of 
what is already a small community of collectors.

With no solid numbers whatsoever to back me up, I'd bet that there were far
more people actively collecting and concerned about tag variants on Beeny
Babies at their height than have ever even HEARD of a hammer meteorite.  
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

2009-01-03 Thread Dave Gheesling
PS - Sad, but true...no such solid numbers are needed to call the below a
fact. 

-Original Message-
From: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Darren
Garrison
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 9:10 PM
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 20:53:24 -0500, you wrote:

but I'd beg to differ with them being of concern to a small subset of 
what is already a small community of collectors.

With no solid numbers whatsoever to back me up, I'd bet that there were far
more people actively collecting and concerned about tag variants on Beeny
Babies at their height than have ever even HEARD of a hammer meteorite.  
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] NWA 4901 write up request

2009-01-03 Thread STARSANDSCOPES
Hi list,  I was planning on using some  killer micrographs of NWA 4901, the 
ungrouped achondrite paired with NWA 011, in  the article I do for Meteorite 
Times.

I have found some interesting write  ups on the material but I don't want to 
just copy-paste any thing that sounds  interesting.  I was thinking that some 
of you may already have something  written on NWA 4901 and it's pairings.  If 
you are willing to share, I will  use it in the article Micro Visions and 
certainly give you credit.   

Last month Bernd gave me some beautiful wide field NWA 3151 Brachinite  
micrographs to use.  Check it out on the current Meteorite Times.   

Tom  

**New year...new news.  Be the first to know what is making 
headlines. (http://www.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntaolcom0026)
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

2009-01-03 Thread Darren Garrison
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 21:50:18 -0500, you wrote:

I thought you meant to say the community of hammer collectors within the
meteorite collecting community was small -- relative to the international
meteorite collecting community itself.  

I would say that it probably is, when defined as a main concern for the
collectors-- you have people who collect by type, people who collect by
location, people who collect only witnessed falls, and people who collect based
on wherther or not it hit some human artifact.  At most, what percentage of
meteorite collectors have hammers being a main collecting criteria?  10%?  I'd
bet that it doesn't approach 25%.  It is, then, a small percentage of what is
already a tiny (compaired to world population and compaired to other areas of
collecting) group of people.  

My point being-- a term in use by such a small number of people and known by
such a small number of people woukd, I think, be more vaguely defined than
something-- say-- that would reach The OED or Encyclopedia Britannica (leaving
the Urban Dictionary and Wikipedia out of the equation for the moment).
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

2009-01-03 Thread LITIG8NSHARK
Good evening Folks,

It's been a long time, but I'd like to add  something:  To me--as I have 
understood it for many years--a Hammer is  nothing more than a meteorite that 
impacts a man-made objectand/or perhaps  the occasional critter.Nothing 
more--Nothing less.

Best regards  to ya'll,
Paul,
Savannah GA
 
PS Happy New Year to all of you!

In a message dated 1/3/2009  10:17:45 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, 
cyna...@charter.net writes:
On Sat, 3  Jan 2009 21:50:18 -0500, you wrote:

I thought you meant to say the  community of hammer collectors within the
meteorite collecting community  was small -- relative to the international
meteorite collecting community  itself.  




**New year...new news.  Be the first to know what is making 
headlines. (http://www.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntaolcom0026)
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

2009-01-03 Thread Dave Gheesling
Good points, Darren...and the list of collecting criteria could go on and on
ad infinitum.  Yet it would also be interesting to measure this hammer issue
not in units but in dollars (or Euros or whatever currency).  Like you, I
have no solid statistics here (this arena really needs them badly, by the
way), but, when looking at market price and/or relative price/gram (i.e.
value), the representative percentage of both collectors in the community
and specimens in collections would obviously be substantially higher than on
a units basis.  Whatever the statistics, it is true that a significant
premium is paid by collectors for hammers, and we could probably all (at
least most) agree it would be a good thing to have a better definition of
that term...at least a consistent one. 

-Original Message-
From: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Darren
Garrison
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 10:18 PM
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 21:50:18 -0500, you wrote:

I thought you meant to say the community of hammer collectors within 
the meteorite collecting community was small -- relative to the 
international meteorite collecting community itself.

I would say that it probably is, when defined as a main concern for the
collectors-- you have people who collect by type, people who collect by
location, people who collect only witnessed falls, and people who collect
based on wherther or not it hit some human artifact.  At most, what
percentage of meteorite collectors have hammers being a main collecting
criteria?  10%?  I'd bet that it doesn't approach 25%.  It is, then, a small
percentage of what is already a tiny (compaired to world population and
compaired to other areas of
collecting) group of people.  

My point being-- a term in use by such a small number of people and known by
such a small number of people woukd, I think, be more vaguely defined than
something-- say-- that would reach The OED or Encyclopedia Britannica
(leaving the Urban Dictionary and Wikipedia out of the equation for the
moment).
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Another teaching question

2009-01-03 Thread Pete Shugar
After many posts, I think that I now have a tenuous
handle on the differences between Pallasites and
Mesosideroites.
Now the question is---
When looking at  the irons, the Wittmenstraden pattern
and the thickness tell whether it is a 
Coursest   Octahedrite  or just an Octahedrite.
And just for giggles which are the iron and which
are the nickle bands?
Pete

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

2009-01-03 Thread John.L.Cabassi

G'Day List
This thread has been very interesting. Hammers have really not played an 
important part of my quest to seek knowledge, meteoritically speaking. But 
the discussions have been an eye opener, especially when it comes to a few 
mets that I had not considered.


Mike, thanks for starting this.  Steve, you continue to amaze me.
Dave, what can I say? Thanks for all your input. I for one, have definitely 
benefited from it.


As for my little humor on hammers, I sincerely apologize. It was in jest and 
not to throw anybody off the subject presently being discussed. I'm just a 
happy person by nature.


Cheers
John

- Original Message - 
From: Dave Gheesling d...@fallingrocks.com

To: cyna...@charter.net; meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 7:24 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?


Good points, Darren...and the list of collecting criteria could go on and 
on
ad infinitum.  Yet it would also be interesting to measure this hammer 
issue

not in units but in dollars (or Euros or whatever currency).  Like you, I
have no solid statistics here (this arena really needs them badly, by the
way), but, when looking at market price and/or relative price/gram (i.e.
value), the representative percentage of both collectors in the 
community
and specimens in collections would obviously be substantially higher than 
on

a units basis.  Whatever the statistics, it is true that a significant
premium is paid by collectors for hammers, and we could probably all (at
least most) agree it would be a good thing to have a better definition of
that term...at least a consistent one.

-Original Message-
From: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Darren
Garrison
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 10:18 PM
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 21:50:18 -0500, you wrote:


I thought you meant to say the community of hammer collectors within
the meteorite collecting community was small -- relative to the
international meteorite collecting community itself.


I would say that it probably is, when defined as a main concern for the
collectors-- you have people who collect by type, people who collect by
location, people who collect only witnessed falls, and people who collect
based on wherther or not it hit some human artifact.  At most, what
percentage of meteorite collectors have hammers being a main collecting
criteria?  10%?  I'd bet that it doesn't approach 25%.  It is, then, a 
small

percentage of what is already a tiny (compaired to world population and
compaired to other areas of
collecting) group of people.

My point being-- a term in use by such a small number of people and known 
by

such a small number of people woukd, I think, be more vaguely defined than
something-- say-- that would reach The OED or Encyclopedia Britannica
(leaving the Urban Dictionary and Wikipedia out of the equation for the
moment).
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

2009-01-03 Thread Jerry Flaherty

Now that's a hammer. Nice work Steve. Super piece
- Original Message - 
From: meteorh...@aol.com
To: d...@fallingrocks.com; cyna...@charter.net; 
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com

Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 9:03 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?



In a message dated 1/3/2009 7:56:11 P.M. Central  Standard Time,
d...@fallingrocks.com writes:
Sylacauga is a wonderful  story,
but the material available to collectors didn't hit Mrs. Hodges on the 
hip.


Dave,

In 1999 I brokered a couple of pieces of Sylacaga from  the King 
Collection
that did indeed come from the stone that hit Mrs.  Hodges.  It came from a 
core
sample taken from that very stone.   Somehow Dr. King talked them (the 
local
library or museum)  into taking a  small core sample from it, maybe he 
traded

them some Allende for it.

I  think most of what is on the market of Sylacaga came from the King 
piece,
but  check the provenance.  If the slices are round, or partially round on 
one

edge, it is probably from that core piece.

Steve Arnold #1

**New year...new news.  Be the first to know what is making
headlines. (http://www.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntaolcom0026)
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

2009-01-03 Thread Robert Woolard
Steve and List,

  Steve, are you absolutely sure the core came from THE Hodges's stone( the 
one that struck her) and NOT the McKinney stone??? I have not actually seen the 
Hodge's stone in person, and maybe you have, so you MAY be right. But ... if I 
may quote a few words from one of our illustrious members' ( who I hope 
doesn't mind me using them, and that he will join in the discussion, too ) 
website that state:

  There were two stones - the one that hit the human and one other. The 
one that hit the human is the centerpiece in a local museum. No one has ever 
had access to it. However,the second stone is in the Smithsonion and though the 
remainder has never been available to the public, it did have one core drilled 
in it. This core ended up in the collection of Dr. 
King. After his death his widow allowed it to be cut into about 10 whafer 
slices all of which all ended up as primary specimens in private collections.

  So have you seen THE  Hodges' stone in person and saw that there actually IS 
a hole drilled into THAT very one  

  Thanks,
  Robert Woolard


--- On Sat, 1/3/09, meteorh...@aol.com meteorh...@aol.com wrote:

 From: meteorh...@aol.com meteorh...@aol.com
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?
 To: d...@fallingrocks.com, cyna...@charter.net, 
 meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Date: Saturday, January 3, 2009, 8:03 PM
 In a message dated 1/3/2009 7:56:11 P.M. Central  Standard
 Time, 
 d...@fallingrocks.com writes:
 Sylacauga is a wonderful  story,
 but the material available to collectors didn't hit
 Mrs. Hodges on the  hip.
 
 Dave,
 
 In 1999 I brokered a couple of pieces of Sylacaga from  the
 King Collection 
 that did indeed come from the stone that hit Mrs.  Hodges. 
 It came from a core 
 sample taken from that very stone.   Somehow Dr. King
 talked them (the local 
 library or museum)  into taking a  small core sample from
 it, maybe he traded 
 them some Allende for it.
 
 I  think most of what is on the market of Sylacaga came
 from the King piece, 
 but  check the provenance.  If the slices are round, or
 partially round on one 
  edge, it is probably from that core piece.
 
 Steve Arnold #1  
 
 **New year...new news.  Be the first to know
 what is making 
 headlines. (http://www.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntaolcom0026)
 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


  
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

2009-01-03 Thread Mike Bandli
The problem with the 'hammers' is that some are not. For example: Pultusk,
which is broadly referred to as a 'hammer,' when, without conclusive
evidence, it is unknown what actual/individual stones or 'peas' struck
artifacts. The same can be said about Murchison, Allende, and many others. I
believe a true 'hammer' can only be a piece of the actual meteorite that
struck the human/artifact and not the fall itself.

The lure of hammers (to me) has been the material with irrefutable evidence
and/or photographic documentation. To name a few: Strathmore, Claxton,
Peekskill, and recently, 'Zunhua.' But then consider Ausson, which lacks any
photos and or clear documentation - still a hammer?

I think that the hammer category is great, but, like Dave said, there needs
to be some clarity and consistency to what a hammer really is!

Bonk!

Mike Bandli

 



-Original Message-
From: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Dave
Gheesling
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 7:25 PM
To: cyna...@charter.net; meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

Good points, Darren...and the list of collecting criteria could go on and on
ad infinitum.  Yet it would also be interesting to measure this hammer issue
not in units but in dollars (or Euros or whatever currency).  Like you, I
have no solid statistics here (this arena really needs them badly, by the
way), but, when looking at market price and/or relative price/gram (i.e.
value), the representative percentage of both collectors in the community
and specimens in collections would obviously be substantially higher than on
a units basis.  Whatever the statistics, it is true that a significant
premium is paid by collectors for hammers, and we could probably all (at
least most) agree it would be a good thing to have a better definition of
that term...at least a consistent one. 

-Original Message-
From: meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com
[mailto:meteorite-list-boun...@meteoritecentral.com] On Behalf Of Darren
Garrison
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2009 10:18 PM
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

On Sat, 3 Jan 2009 21:50:18 -0500, you wrote:

I thought you meant to say the community of hammer collectors within 
the meteorite collecting community was small -- relative to the 
international meteorite collecting community itself.

I would say that it probably is, when defined as a main concern for the
collectors-- you have people who collect by type, people who collect by
location, people who collect only witnessed falls, and people who collect
based on wherther or not it hit some human artifact.  At most, what
percentage of meteorite collectors have hammers being a main collecting
criteria?  10%?  I'd bet that it doesn't approach 25%.  It is, then, a small
percentage of what is already a tiny (compaired to world population and
compaired to other areas of
collecting) group of people.  

My point being-- a term in use by such a small number of people and known by
such a small number of people woukd, I think, be more vaguely defined than
something-- say-- that would reach The OED or Encyclopedia Britannica
(leaving the Urban Dictionary and Wikipedia out of the equation for the
moment).
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] Your Specialized Categories?

2009-01-03 Thread Mike Bandli
The 'hammer' category talk makes me wonder what other specialized categories
people collect. The following specialized categories hold a special place in
my heart and collection:

1. Orbitally Tracked meteorites
2. Filmed meteorites

If owning a meteorite wasn't good enough, how about being able to watch the
birth of your meteorite or know its orbit.

While the list could go on forever, it might be interesting to see what
other specialized categories others collect. (Aside from the obvious ones:
types, historical, localities, witnessed falls, etc.)

Cheers,

Mike Bandli

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


[meteorite-list] RE : Re: AD Encyclopedia-of-meteorites.com website for sale

2009-01-03 Thread Pelé Pierre-Marie
Hello Michael,

As I'm not very fluent in english, I think my words
were misunderstood.

Everybody can bid to buy my website and domain. I just
said that it may be a meteorite collector or a dealer.
But a dealer has to separate his own business and the
datas included in the Encyclopedia, especially the
information added by the members. But I think most of
the dealers of the Meteorite List are fair and
respectful of that.

Happy new year,

Pierre

--- Michael L Blood mlbl...@cox.net a écrit :

 Greetings Pierre and all,
 Pierre, I was concerned about your comment
 of hoping
 The new owner is not a meteorite dealer who would
 benefit
 From the web site personally in any way.
 Being a dealer puts one in a position to
 contribute to the
 meteoritic community and not just be some kind of
 blood sucking
 leach! 
 In fact, most of the dealers I know are
 major contributors to the
 community  some are truly outstanding in giving of
 their time  energy,
 Such as Anne Black, Adam Hupe - all the dealers who
 have served
 On the IMCA board (that is a LOT of work, folks),
 Paul Harris  Jim
 Tobin (Meteorite Times, Most of their Meteorite
 Exchange web
 Site), etc, etc. 
 Of course there are many pure collectors who
 have also contributed
 plenty. The point is, any conscientious individual
 would be fine (I have
 No personal interest, myself). Just because someone
 makes money dealing
 meteorites does not mean they can't serve the
 meteoritic community as well.
 Most dealers do - some more than others. ALL of them
 have to make
 Money, as well, but these two things are in no way
 in conflict, even
 Though a few dealers have made their own beds that
 way.
 Best wishes to all, Michael
 
 on 1/3/09 1:50 PM, Pelé Pierre-Marie at
 pierremariep...@yahoo.fr wrote:
 
  Hello Matt and other List Members,
  
  you're right about your interrogations for privacy
 of
  the information included in the Encyclopedia of
  Meteorites.
  
  I won't be able to keep an eye on the new owner
 but I
  wish he's a smart and respectful person who won't
 use
  these information for his business.
  
  When the bids are over on january 31st, I'll speak
 to
  the new owner and explain what the users are
 waiting
  from him. 
  
  But that's all I can do.
  
  If we want the EOM website to live, I've to sell
 it
  because I really can't update it anymore (it takes
  several hours a month). The EOM is useful if it's
  updated...
  
  Pierre
  
  
  

  
  __
  http://www.meteoritecentral.com
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 Get 30% to 50% more gas mileage immediately (I
 did!):
 http://go4best.water4gas.hop.clickbank.net/
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 



  

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] What makes a hammer a hammer?

2009-01-03 Thread MeteorHntr
Hello Robert,

To answer your direct  question, no I have not seen the Hodges's stone.

However, in Dr. King's  Meteorite Collection Catalog he listed the source of 
his Sylacaga specimen as,  and I  quote:

Source: Alabama Mus. Nat. Hist., Douglas Jones

Now, if anyone on the  list has access to the Hodges's stone to examine, my 
hunch is that the core  would have been removed from the bottom portion, as it 
is displayed, and the  hole was probably plugged with something and colored so 
as to hide the fact that  a core was removed.   My memory is a bit fuzzy, but 
as I recall there  were some correspondence letters between Dr. King and the 
Alabama Museum of  Natural History at the time leading up to the acquisition.  
And there was a  concern that any examination would not hurt the aesthetic 
appearance of the  stone. 

However, it might be easier to ask the Smithsonian if their  records indicate 
that any of their Sylacaga was traded to Dr. King.But with the conflict 
NASA (including Dr. King) had with the Smithsonian in the  1960's I seriously 
doubt any trades were done with the Smithsonian.

As  many of you know, we auctioned off the King Collection, and it would make 
some  of you sick if you knew how cheaply that specimen sold for.  I was  
surprised at the time, but then again, there were many great specimens in the  
collection being sold, and most people had to budget where they spent their  
money, so some things went a little lower than expected at that time.   Since 
then, the value has appreciated to more reasonable levels.

I hope  this answers your question Robert?

Steve Arnold #1



In a  message dated 1/3/2009 10:11:11 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
meteoritefin...@yahoo.com writes:
Steve and List,

Steve, are  you absolutely sure the core came from THE Hodges's stone(  
the one that struck her) and NOT the McKinney stone??? I have not actually seen 
 the Hodge's stone in person, and maybe you have, so you MAY be right. But 
... if  I may quote a few words from one of our illustrious members' ( who I 
hope  doesn't mind me using them, and that he will join in the discussion, too 
)  website that state:

There were two stones - the one that hit  the human and one other. The 
one that hit the human is the centerpiece in a  local museum. No one has ever 
had access to it. However,the second stone is in  the Smithsonion and though 
the remainder has never been available to the public,  it did have one core 
drilled in it. This core ended up in the collection of Dr.  
King. After his death his widow allowed it to be cut into about 10 whafer  
slices all of which all ended up as primary specimens in private  collections.

So have you seen THE  Hodges' stone in person  and saw that there actually IS 
a hole drilled into THAT very one   

Thanks,
Robert Woolard  

**New year...new news.  Be the first to know what is making 
headlines. (http://www.aol.com/?ncid=emlcntaolcom0026)
__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list