Today's Meteorite Picture of the Day: Girgenti
Contributed by: Anonymous
http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/mpod.asp
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Dear Collectors,
Check out the Vesta-Tatahouine-Dawn trinket at
http://www.tucsonmeteorites.com/tatacoin.asp
10% off for MetList members :)
Thanks for looking.
Paul Swartz
IMCA 5204
__
Visit the Archives at
Hi Greg,
Good old empty precision on a number converted from metric units.
11,000 metric tons = 24250848.8 lbs. The humorous thing is that
I seriously doubt the original mass is known to better than a
factor of 3, so none of the digits are significant. --Rob
Thanks for the explanation, Rob. That makes it a lot easier for me to accept.
Sometimes claims by scientists mystify me. This was one of those times, but I
understand it now. Thanks again.
Greg L.
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 13:54:43 -0700
From:
Wouldn't it of progressively obtained more weight as it came closer to the
surface of the Earth? Isn't it true the higher you climb into the sky the
less you would weigh so if true then the opposite must be true! So what was
the weight when it exploded, since it was closer to the surface of the
Kilograms are a unit of mass, which is regardless of the force of
gravity. Although often spoken of as weight, correctly it should be
referred to as mass.
Michael in so. Cal.
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Don Merchant dmerc...@rochester.rr.com wrote:
Wouldn't it of progressively obtained
Anyone willing to sell me a large lunar stone based on it's lunar weight but
earth $/g, let me know.
Mendy
From: Michael Mulgrew mikest...@gmail.com
To: Don Merchant dmerc...@rochester.rr.com
Cc: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 9,
Michael, you are totally correct.
Did you notice that the current usage (in MetBull but also in some
official scientific papers) is that one always writes total known
weight but also main mass ?
Is this now fully admitted or tolerated or ...just odd ?
I was puzzled with this years ago but
Weight is a force, properly measured in Newtons (or some other unit of
force). And strictly, your comment should have referred to the
acceleration of gravity, not the force of gravity. Of course, mass and
weight are related by Newton's Second Law, F=ma. And it is quite true
that the
April 9, 2013
Joshua Buck
Headquarters, Washington
202-358-1100
jb...@nasa.gov
Josh Byerly
Johnson Space Center, Houston
281-483-5111
josh.bye...@nasa.gov
MEDIA ADVISORY: M13-058
NASA TV PROVIDES COVERAGE OF SPACE STATION CARGO SHIP ACTIVITIES
Hello,
this week 96 item on ebay...
A Buzzard Coulee crusted endcut, a nice thin etched Fukang, a martian meteorite
(0.54g) without reserve price, a 16.58g Tatahouine, a specimen of Nuvvuagittuq
paragneiss (4.28Ga, oldest terrestrial rock).
And the etched main mass, as an oriented
Greetings Listoids,
I'm looking for someone to cut some impact breccia and some meteorites for me.
Please contact me off list.
thanks,
Steve
Steve Witt
IMCA #9020
http://imca.cc/
__
Visit the Archives at http://www.meteorite-list-archives.com
12 matches
Mail list logo