Hello Everyone,
Sorry for the late reply - it's spring break, and the rocks don't find
themselves.
It's hard to disagree with *common sense*. Unfortunately, Mark has already
made at least a few pretty bad *common sense* pairing mistakes that I'm
pretty sure have put misrepresented material into
Hello Jason,
As long as material is described accurately, I don't care what you do. I
only butted in here because it annoyed me to see you attacking a Moroccan
seller who is probably selling accurately paired material, while you’re
openly doing the same thing with other meteorites. Glass house
Hello Jason,
To be consistent, you should remove the HaH 346 and NWA 869 specimens you
have listed for sale on your website. Those classifications were submitted
by other dealers; your stones are unclassified individuals from DCAs with
no evidence of their find locations, etc.
On your "featured"
Those are skin splits, not contacts. Its surface had cooled to form a
skin, interior was still molten / plastic. See Nininger & Huss (1967):
https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.157.3784.61
http://www.tektites.co.uk/stretch.html
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 9:19 AM Thomas Harris iMac
The photo of Haig shows concave depressions, not bulbous lumps. It’s not
good photo perspective.
The closest visual match to this stone would be something like Patos de
Minas (the octahedrite), but comparing a relatively fresh desert stone with
fusion crust — to a fissured, decomposing iron from
pedia.org/wiki/Gaslighting
Jason
On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 7:30 PM, Adam Hupe via Meteorite-list
wrote:
> Spoken by a true pioneer in self-pairing and piggy-backing,
>
> Anybody for any self-paired and piggy-backed Black Beauty?
>
>
>
>
> On 6/25/2018 1:40 AM, Jason Utas via
Please note that the slice pictured is NWA 3200, not NWA 860. Someone made
a mistake and “self-paired” two completely different iron meteorites.
Jason
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 1:00 AM Paul Swartz via Meteorite-list <
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com> wrote:
> Today's Meteorite Picture of the
We've had this discussion before, Adam. You're gaslighting.
The pairing rules are very clear and can be read in section 4.2 (a) and (b)
of this link: https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/docs/nc-guidelines.pdf
Key statements:
1) "a single (collective) name may be given in cases where fragments fit
Some additional photos:
(1) http://meteoritegallery.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/DSCN8994.jpg
(2) http://meteoritegallery.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/DSCN8992.jpg
(3) http://meteoritegallery.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/DSCN8991.jpg
(4)
9 matches
Mail list logo
