-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 11:30 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Iron Meteorite on Mars (Color Photo)
I must be misunderstanding something fundamentally here, then. My
assumptions are:
1.) the optics are precise enough to focus enough photons on the CCD to
provide
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:25:42 -0700, Chris Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
imaging like this, it is really only meaningful to talk about resolution in
an angular sense, not in terms of the number of pixels. When we look at the
I think the problem is that we were using two different meanings
The Other side says.20th Century Fox..prop made in China
Jerry
- Original Message -
From: Sterling K. Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 2:57 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Iron Meteorite on Mars
http://www.xenotechresearch.com/truecol1.htm
Here is a nice text about color calibration of images from Mars
-[ MARCIN CIMALA ]-[ I.M.C.A.#3667 ]-
http://www.Meteoryt.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.PolandMET.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.Gao-Guenie.com GSM
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 01:44:33 +0100, Meteoryt.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.xenotechresearch.com/truecol1.htm
Here is a nice text about color calibration of images from Mars
Hard to believe that something that well written and cogent came from such a
complete and utter
crackpot.
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/mer/images.cfm?id=1466
[Image]
Iron Meteorite on Mars
January 19, 2005
NASA's Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity has found an iron meteorite on
Mars, the first meteorite of any type ever identified on another planet.
The pitted, basketball-size object is mostly
Hello Ron. What a cool color picture that is. Is
there a possibility in the near future of a color
print being published that a person could purchase? I
for one would like to have one! Thanks for all the
info that you provide to us!
Dave
Wow! This is a much more convincing photo. Is there a HiRez color closeup?
In this image, you don't see the facets and ridges so clearly as in the
earlier one.
Most interesting...
Nick
At 06:29 PM 1/19/2005, Dave Schultz wrote:
Hello Ron. What a cool color picture that is. Is
there a
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:29:25 -0800 (PST), Dave Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello Ron. What a cool color picture that is. Is
there a possibility in the near future of a color
print being published that a person could purchase? I
for one would like to have one! Thanks for all the
info that
I doubt that NASA has a higer-resolution version of the photo than they are releasing to the public.
Why not simply send the photo to one of the many photo printing services on the internet (like
www.dotphoto.com, www.shutterfly.com, and www.clubphoto.com) and buy a print from them? Or even
take
I have no trouble capturing, printing, editing any size photo in PhotoShop.
I'd just like to see a color image with the resolution of the first BW image.
I'd like to see it in the resolution they receive it in.
It's likely that the ones released for public consumption are lower Rez.
Are they?
Nick
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 20:34:08 -0800, Nicholas Gessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to see it in the resolution they receive it in.
It's likely that the ones released for public consumption are lower Rez.
Are they?
It can never be too very high in resolution-- the CCD is only 1 megapixel:
*
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
- Original Message -
From: Darren Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 9:44 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Iron Meteorite on Mars (Color Photo
*
Chris L Peterson
Cloudbait Observatory
http://www.cloudbait.com
- Original Message -
From: Darren Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 9:44 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Iron Meteorite on Mars
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:46:07 -0500, Darren Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:18:33 -0700, Chris Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The number of pixels has nothing to do with resolution. What matters is the
size of each pixel and the focal length of the camera. In the case
Message -
From: Darren Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 10:46 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Iron Meteorite on Mars (Color Photo)
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:18:33 -0700, Chris Peterson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The number
- Original Message -
From: Darren Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2005 10:57 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Iron Meteorite on Mars (Color Photo)
Just as a follow-up, I found the correct word that goes in the place of my
incorrectly
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 23:08:45 -0700, Chris Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Darren-
Replacing the Pancam sensor with, say, a 5MP array wouldn't yield better
resolution. If the physical size of the sensor were larger, you would have a
greater field of view. But even if the sensor had smaller
Hi,
Assumption one is wrong.
Basically, the PanCam is just about as good a camera as the $19.95 Samsung
Digital Point'N'Shoot
dangling from the discount store rack. The image is 512x512 by 32 bits deep (I
presume) and that's your
one megapixel.
If everyone chips in for the ticket,
19 matches
Mail list logo
