Re: [meteorite-list] RE: New Lucerne discovery -- historical info first

2005-01-06 Thread joseph_town
It's a shame when a group of smug people become so cut off from the general population as to think they can dictate thought policy. Rock the boat and you're a heckler. Question the IMCA for instance. No dissent is acceptable. Do we really want this list to end up like the pathetic IMCA list? I

Re: [meteorite-list] RE: New Lucerne discovery -- historical info first

2005-01-06 Thread Zelimir Gabelica
Hi List, Time is missing to fully comment the whole actual list polemics (boring ads, attacks, new list, moderated list...). I am just now keeping reading (= overlooking) various comments and perhaps will send my feelings once more ideas are put on the table by people technically more expert

[meteorite-list] Re: New Lucerne discovery -- historical info first

2005-01-05 Thread Robert Verish
Matson, Rob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Some of the most interesting stories are the ones that are rarely told here -- meteorite hunting stories. Instead, these end to be revealed slowly by word of mouth due to the need for secrecy or confidentiality/proprietary concerns. (You never saw Franconia

[meteorite-list] RE: New Lucerne discovery -- historical info first

2005-01-05 Thread Matson, Robert
Hi Bob and List, I understand the point you were trying to make, Rob, but you chose a bad example when you picked Franconia. Actually, Franconia was first mentioned (by me) at Tucson two years ago, not last year. I stand corrected -- since last year was my first year at the Tucson show, I

Re: [meteorite-list] RE: New Lucerne discovery -- historical info first

2005-01-05 Thread Impactika
In a message dated 1/5/2005 9:32:24 P.M. Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: One thing's for sure -- if we do nothing, this list will die. The passive approach isn't going to fix it. My intent was to try to breathe some life back into the list and perhaps inspire others to