[meteorite-list] The Bob Evans Lawsuit

2008-04-12 Thread McCartney Taylor
Yes, there was a lawsuit against Bob Evans brought by me.  It was in regards to 
a trade that was partially done, where I sent material and only received a 
partial trade, then Evans went quiet.  No contact for many months.  Eventually, 
I posted about it and received many replies that he has done this before.  His 
modus operandi is usually to go quiet and not communicate.  Which is what he's 
doing now.

He did not show in court, I received a default judgment by the judge.  Evans 
did not appeal and a judgment was issued.  I spent the money to have the 
judgment filed in Illinois and a lien filed against his house.  At this time he 
can not purchase or sell, or inherit real property until the judgment is paid. 
It is collecting 8% interest at this time.

If I recall my contract law correctly, selling NWA junk as Zulu Queen would be 
'Misrepresentation' as well as Unjust Enrichment.  Selling Zulu Queen that he 
didn't know was NWA junk is simply 'Mutual Misunderstanding'.  Good luck in 
proving he had prior knowledge it was NWA junk.

This is a small sandbox we play in. Play nice.

-mt

 Original Message 
 From: AL Mitterling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 12:36 PM
 To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] It was intuition ? OK ?
 
 Greetings List Members,
 
 On June 24th 2004 there were some claims made against the person in 
 question. Apparently there was a lawsuit against this seller. I have 
 stayed clear of him ever since, though I never dealt with him. I suggest 
 people look up the archives and do their own reading and decide for 
 themselves. It may be the issue was resolved but I guess my feeling is 
 how it got to that point in the first place. Best!
 
 --AL Mitterling



__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] The Bob Evans Lawsuit

2008-04-12 Thread Walter Branch

This is a small sandbox we play in. Play nice.


Well said, McCartney.

-Walter Branch


- Original Message - 
From: McCartney Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 2:00 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] The Bob Evans Lawsuit


Yes, there was a lawsuit against Bob Evans brought by me.  It was in 
regards to a trade that was partially done, where I sent material and only 
received a partial trade, then Evans went quiet.  No contact for many 
months.  Eventually, I posted about it and received many replies that he 
has done this before.  His modus operandi is usually to go quiet and not 
communicate.  Which is what he's doing now.


He did not show in court, I received a default judgment by the judge. 
Evans did not appeal and a judgment was issued.  I spent the money to have 
the judgment filed in Illinois and a lien filed against his house.  At 
this time he can not purchase or sell, or inherit real property until the 
judgment is paid. It is collecting 8% interest at this time.


If I recall my contract law correctly, selling NWA junk as Zulu Queen 
would be 'Misrepresentation' as well as Unjust Enrichment.  Selling Zulu 
Queen that he didn't know was NWA junk is simply 'Mutual 
Misunderstanding'.  Good luck in proving he had prior knowledge it was NWA 
junk.


This is a small sandbox we play in. Play nice.

-mt

 Original Message 

From: AL Mitterling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 12:36 PM
To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] It was intuition ? OK ?

Greetings List Members,

On June 24th 2004 there were some claims made against the person in
question. Apparently there was a lawsuit against this seller. I have
stayed clear of him ever since, though I never dealt with him. I suggest
people look up the archives and do their own reading and decide for
themselves. It may be the issue was resolved but I guess my feeling is
how it got to that point in the first place. Best!

--AL Mitterling




__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 


__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] The Bob Evans Lawsuit

2008-04-12 Thread Wendy Piatek
What are the rules of the list and what would be necessary in order to expel 
someone.
Certainly there is enough questions concerning this character  to warrant 
some action..
Personally I don't want to read another email of Bob pointing out another 
ebay scammer. In my opinion he is extremely bad for this field. There have 
been other characters with similar practices that have come and gone. What 
got rid of them?


Does anyone know what could be done to notify ebay of his practices in order 
to limit him from ebay listings? In other words what department/ email 
address would one write? I don't want to see another questionable meteorite 
sold to some unsuspecting soul thinking they got something that is not 
represented.




Jay
- Original Message - 
From: McCartney Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 2:00 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] The Bob Evans Lawsuit


Yes, there was a lawsuit against Bob Evans brought by me.  It was in 
regards to a trade that was partially done, where I sent material and only 
received a partial trade, then Evans went quiet.  No contact for many 
months.  Eventually, I posted about it and received many replies that he 
has done this before.  His modus operandi is usually to go quiet and not 
communicate.  Which is what he's doing now.


He did not show in court, I received a default judgment by the judge. 
Evans did not appeal and a judgment was issued.  I spent the money to have 
the judgment filed in Illinois and a lien filed against his house.  At 
this time he can not purchase or sell, or inherit real property until the 
judgment is paid. It is collecting 8% interest at this time.


If I recall my contract law correctly, selling NWA junk as Zulu Queen 
would be 'Misrepresentation' as well as Unjust Enrichment.  Selling Zulu 
Queen that he didn't know was NWA junk is simply 'Mutual 
Misunderstanding'.  Good luck in proving he had prior knowledge it was NWA 
junk.


This is a small sandbox we play in. Play nice.

-mt

 Original Message 

From: AL Mitterling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 12:36 PM
To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] It was intuition ? OK ?

Greetings List Members,

On June 24th 2004 there were some claims made against the person in
question. Apparently there was a lawsuit against this seller. I have
stayed clear of him ever since, though I never dealt with him. I suggest
people look up the archives and do their own reading and decide for
themselves. It may be the issue was resolved but I guess my feeling is
how it got to that point in the first place. Best!

--AL Mitterling




__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list




__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] The Bob Evans Lawsuit

2008-04-12 Thread Dave Gheesling
Walter  All,
Agreed, though nice might easily be taken to include with integrity.  As
it stands today, McCartney is correct to say good luck proving that
[so-and-so] had prior knowledge they were selling NWA junk as something of
significant provenance.  Again, were IMCA to establish enough power over
time by virtue of the value of their authority, they would be able to deny
membership to sellers who could not or would not provide proper evidence of
provenance for certain types of specimens.  Maybe a pipe dream, maybe not.
But playing nice, it seems to me, does not include sitting on the
sidelines only to watch something which may be detrimental to this field
unfold (and for which apparently zero counter-evidence has been provided
after repeated requests) without question by SOMEone or SOME body of
authority.  Of course this is just one guy's opinion...
Dave

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Walter
Branch
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 2:13 PM
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] The Bob Evans Lawsuit

This is a small sandbox we play in. Play nice.

Well said, McCartney.

-Walter Branch


- Original Message - 
From: McCartney Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 2:00 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] The Bob Evans Lawsuit


 Yes, there was a lawsuit against Bob Evans brought by me.  It was in 
 regards to a trade that was partially done, where I sent material and only

 received a partial trade, then Evans went quiet.  No contact for many 
 months.  Eventually, I posted about it and received many replies that he 
 has done this before.  His modus operandi is usually to go quiet and not 
 communicate.  Which is what he's doing now.

 He did not show in court, I received a default judgment by the judge. 
 Evans did not appeal and a judgment was issued.  I spent the money to have

 the judgment filed in Illinois and a lien filed against his house.  At 
 this time he can not purchase or sell, or inherit real property until the 
 judgment is paid. It is collecting 8% interest at this time.

 If I recall my contract law correctly, selling NWA junk as Zulu Queen 
 would be 'Misrepresentation' as well as Unjust Enrichment.  Selling Zulu 
 Queen that he didn't know was NWA junk is simply 'Mutual 
 Misunderstanding'.  Good luck in proving he had prior knowledge it was NWA

 junk.

 This is a small sandbox we play in. Play nice.

 -mt

  Original Message 
 From: AL Mitterling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 12:36 PM
 To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] It was intuition ? OK ?

 Greetings List Members,

 On June 24th 2004 there were some claims made against the person in
 question. Apparently there was a lawsuit against this seller. I have
 stayed clear of him ever since, though I never dealt with him. I suggest
 people look up the archives and do their own reading and decide for
 themselves. It may be the issue was resolved but I guess my feeling is
 how it got to that point in the first place. Best!

 --AL Mitterling



 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list 

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] The Bob Evans Lawsuit

2008-04-12 Thread Adam Hupe
Hi McCartney,

I do not care for the phrase you used NWA junk  No
real meteorite is junk.  I could care less where a
meteorite lands as long as it was legally obtained.  I
am a sample person, along with hundreds of other
collectors who collect by type including NASA ans many
instatutions.  My main concern is that all samples be
laboratory confirmed as to its rarity by type, not
where or when it fell.

My problem with Bob Evans stemmed from his
self-proclaimed pairings and stolen descriptions. I
argued continually with him and Stan for several
months and it seemed very few cared.  Now, lab work is
greatly appreciated and reputable dealers would never
dream of borrowing others numbers and descriptions.

As far as rare or historical falls are concerned, I
generally avoid them as I have been taken for several
thousand on such deals.  Kapoeta, in particular sold
to me by a well-known and respected dealer at the time
now stands out.  This left an indelible scare on my
mind. It changed my habits and turned me into a type
collector instead of accumulating historical material.


Please do not call any meteorite Junk as I find it
disrespectful.

Adam







Cartney Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Yes, there was a lawsuit against Bob Evans brought
 by me.  It was in regards to a trade that was
 partially done, where I sent material and only
 received a partial trade, then Evans went quiet.  No
 contact for many months.  Eventually, I posted about
 it and received many replies that he has done this
 before.  His modus operandi is usually to go quiet
 and not communicate.  Which is what he's doing now.
 
 He did not show in court, I received a default
 judgment by the judge.  Evans did not appeal and a
 judgment was issued.  I spent the money to have the
 judgment filed in Illinois and a lien filed against
 his house.  At this time he can not purchase or
 sell, or inherit real property until the judgment is
 paid. It is collecting 8% interest at this time.
 
 If I recall my contract law correctly, selling NWA
 junk as Zulu Queen would be 'Misrepresentation' as
 well as Unjust Enrichment.  Selling Zulu Queen that
 he didn't know was NWA junk is simply 'Mutual
 Misunderstanding'.  Good luck in proving he had
 prior knowledge it was NWA junk.
 
 This is a small sandbox we play in. Play nice.
 
 -mt
 
  Original Message 
  From: AL Mitterling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 12:36 PM
  To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] It was intuition ?
 OK ?
  
  Greetings List Members,
  
  On June 24th 2004 there were some claims made
 against the person in 
  question. Apparently there was a lawsuit against
 this seller. I have 
  stayed clear of him ever since, though I never
 dealt with him. I suggest 
  people look up the archives and do their own
 reading and decide for 
  themselves. It may be the issue was resolved but I
 guess my feeling is 
  how it got to that point in the first place. Best!
  
  --AL Mitterling
 
 
 
 __
 http://www.meteoritecentral.com
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com

http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 

__
http://www.meteoritecentral.com
Meteorite-list mailing list
Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] The Bob Evans Lawsuit

2008-04-12 Thread Norbert Classen
Hi Dave, and All,

You wrote:

 Again, were IMCA to establish enough power over time by virtue 
 of the value of their authority, they would be able to deny 
 membership to sellers who could not or would not provide proper 
 evidence of provenance for certain types of specimens.  Maybe a 
 pipe dream, maybe not.

We actually do that on a regular basis, already. We are getting about four
membership applications or more per week, and only about one is approved by
a majority vote by the IMCA Board of Directors. Some applications don't even
make it to voting as many applicants fail to list recommending members, or
just fill in names of members who never heard about them. So yes, we check
the reputation of each and every applicant, we check their eBay auctions and
website sales (if any), and we often discuss their behaviour on the list (if
they are posting here), and other things prior to voting.
Of course, that doesn't mean that we can check everything, and sometimes we
receive complaints about our members that are always taken very seriously by
the IMCA Board of Directors. There have been a few cases in which we had to
expell members for various reasons, and I think most of you are aware of
that. So it's not just a dream - the IMCA is very real and functioning; I
just wish that more people would be aware of that. In any case, be assured
that some people would have no chance to get into our Association - we're
certainly not blind, and we are very well aware of what's going on. All of
you good guys and gals are most welcome, of course. So, if you are a honest
dealer, and if you are no IMCA member, thus far, why not?

All the best,
Norbert Classen
President, IMCA Inc.

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-

Walter  All,
Agreed, though nice might easily be taken to include with integrity.  As
it stands today, McCartney is correct to say good luck proving that
[so-and-so] had prior knowledge they were selling NWA junk as something of
significant provenance.  Again, were IMCA to establish enough power over
time by virtue of the value of their authority, they would be able to deny
membership to sellers who could not or would not provide proper evidence of
provenance for certain types of specimens.  Maybe a pipe dream, maybe not.
But playing nice, it seems to me, does not include sitting on the
sidelines only to watch something which may be detrimental to this field
unfold (and for which apparently zero counter-evidence has been provided
after repeated requests) without question by SOMEone or SOME body of
authority.  Of course this is just one guy's opinion...
Dave

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Walter
Branch
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 2:13 PM
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] The Bob Evans Lawsuit

This is a small sandbox we play in. Play nice.

Well said, McCartney.

-Walter Branch


- Original Message -
From: McCartney Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 2:00 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] The Bob Evans Lawsuit


 Yes, there was a lawsuit against Bob Evans brought by me.  It was in 
 regards to a trade that was partially done, where I sent material and only

 received a partial trade, then Evans went quiet.  No contact for many 
 months.  Eventually, I posted about it and received many replies that he 
 has done this before.  His modus operandi is usually to go quiet and not 
 communicate.  Which is what he's doing now.

 He did not show in court, I received a default judgment by the judge. 
 Evans did not appeal and a judgment was issued.  I spent the money to have

 the judgment filed in Illinois and a lien filed against his house.  At 
 this time he can not purchase or sell, or inherit real property until the 
 judgment is paid. It is collecting 8% interest at this time.

 If I recall my contract law correctly, selling NWA junk as Zulu Queen 
 would be 'Misrepresentation' as well as Unjust Enrichment.  Selling Zulu 
 Queen that he didn't know was NWA junk is simply 'Mutual 
 Misunderstanding'.  Good luck in proving he had prior knowledge it was NWA

 junk.

 This is a small sandbox we play in. Play nice.

 -mt

  Original Message 
 From: AL Mitterling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 12:36 PM
 To: Meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] It was intuition ? OK ?

 Greetings List Members,

 On June 24th 2004 there were some claims made against the person in
 question. Apparently there was a lawsuit against this seller. I have
 stayed clear of him ever since, though I never dealt with him. I suggest
 people look up the archives and do their own reading and decide for
 themselves. It may be the issue was resolved but I guess my feeling is
 how it got to that point in the first place. Best!

 --AL Mitterling



 __
 http

Re: [meteorite-list] The Bob Evans Lawsuit

2008-04-12 Thread Dave Gheesling
Hello Norbert  All,
I absolutely realize that the IMCA does a lot of wonderful things today and
hope that my suggestions weren't taken in any other way.  Most of what I've
said has been forward looking by design, and given the great start that the
IMCA is off to it is that organization which is best positioned to tackle
some of these bigger issues to an even greater extent in the future.  I was
honored to be accepted as a member and hope that everything I do in the
arena is in keeping with the terrific standards which you have established.
Thanks,
Dave

-Original Message-
From: Norbert Classen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 5:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Walter Branch';
meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: AW: [meteorite-list] The Bob Evans Lawsuit

Hi Dave, and All,

You wrote:

 Again, were IMCA to establish enough power over time by virtue 
 of the value of their authority, they would be able to deny 
 membership to sellers who could not or would not provide proper 
 evidence of provenance for certain types of specimens.  Maybe a 
 pipe dream, maybe not.

We actually do that on a regular basis, already. We are getting about four
membership applications or more per week, and only about one is approved by
a majority vote by the IMCA Board of Directors. Some applications don't even
make it to voting as many applicants fail to list recommending members, or
just fill in names of members who never heard about them. So yes, we check
the reputation of each and every applicant, we check their eBay auctions and
website sales (if any), and we often discuss their behaviour on the list (if
they are posting here), and other things prior to voting.
Of course, that doesn't mean that we can check everything, and sometimes we
receive complaints about our members that are always taken very seriously by
the IMCA Board of Directors. There have been a few cases in which we had to
expell members for various reasons, and I think most of you are aware of
that. So it's not just a dream - the IMCA is very real and functioning; I
just wish that more people would be aware of that. In any case, be assured
that some people would have no chance to get into our Association - we're
certainly not blind, and we are very well aware of what's going on. All of
you good guys and gals are most welcome, of course. So, if you are a honest
dealer, and if you are no IMCA member, thus far, why not?

All the best,
Norbert Classen
President, IMCA Inc.

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-

Walter  All,
Agreed, though nice might easily be taken to include with integrity.  As
it stands today, McCartney is correct to say good luck proving that
[so-and-so] had prior knowledge they were selling NWA junk as something of
significant provenance.  Again, were IMCA to establish enough power over
time by virtue of the value of their authority, they would be able to deny
membership to sellers who could not or would not provide proper evidence of
provenance for certain types of specimens.  Maybe a pipe dream, maybe not.
But playing nice, it seems to me, does not include sitting on the
sidelines only to watch something which may be detrimental to this field
unfold (and for which apparently zero counter-evidence has been provided
after repeated requests) without question by SOMEone or SOME body of
authority.  Of course this is just one guy's opinion...
Dave

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Walter
Branch
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 2:13 PM
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] The Bob Evans Lawsuit

This is a small sandbox we play in. Play nice.

Well said, McCartney.

-Walter Branch


- Original Message -
From: McCartney Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: meteorite-list@meteoritecentral.com
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2008 2:00 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] The Bob Evans Lawsuit


 Yes, there was a lawsuit against Bob Evans brought by me.  It was in 
 regards to a trade that was partially done, where I sent material and only

 received a partial trade, then Evans went quiet.  No contact for many 
 months.  Eventually, I posted about it and received many replies that he 
 has done this before.  His modus operandi is usually to go quiet and not 
 communicate.  Which is what he's doing now.

 He did not show in court, I received a default judgment by the judge. 
 Evans did not appeal and a judgment was issued.  I spent the money to have

 the judgment filed in Illinois and a lien filed against his house.  At 
 this time he can not purchase or sell, or inherit real property until the 
 judgment is paid. It is collecting 8% interest at this time.

 If I recall my contract law correctly, selling NWA junk as Zulu Queen 
 would be 'Misrepresentation' as well as Unjust Enrichment.  Selling Zulu 
 Queen that he didn't know was NWA junk is simply 'Mutual 
 Misunderstanding'.  Good luck in proving he had prior knowledge