RE: [meteorite-list] Elma status

2003-08-27 Thread Charles R. Viau








Pekka, Robert Verish and Robert Matson had some excellent comments on this, and I wanted
to comment back to each



For Pekka,

 Thanks
for sharing that data. The chemical analysis looks somewhat similar to what I
have been told , but does vary. Some people I have talked to thought
that the total absence of MgO and MnO
were just as strange. Some said that these were also common
impurities in slag, especially in minerals related to Ilmenite,
and the ratios and streak did not match. Also, the physical
characteristics of the individual pieces seemed to have a very thin, even
coating of the glass and that a slag would most likely be homogenous or glass
on one side with material on the other who knows. It is real strange and I think that what
bothers the analysts the most is that they cannot explain how it was made. I think an electrical or plasma mechanism is really interesting and wonder if there is even
enough existing data on such phenomena to help them there as well. I also hope
that the resulting analysis wont require a PhD in petrology to decipher
J 



For Robert M and Robert V,

 I
agree that there should be a priority for those that have worked so hard and
have material in a queue to be examined. I wonder if the analysts themselves
are really kind of their own boss, and perhaps take on what they feel is easy
to disprove first, and then get wrapped up in the enigma of trying to prove
just what it is when it cannot be easily explained. And/or it was the immediacy
of the Elma event, the story content and the speed in which samples were
available to themIn any case, the NWA thing has hurt a lot of research
and NASA should never have shut the doors on domestic researchers that have
finds that have been properly documented. What they needed to do was put
someone in charge of clearing these finds from the NWA imports based on the
documentation and credibility of the finders.



Thanks,

Charles, IMCA 4351












Re: [meteorite-list] Elma status

2003-08-27 Thread Mark Ferguson



Hi List, Charles 
I would think that all of this is relevant 
information for future meteoritics and other physical sciences. And, my guess is 
that there will be some masters or doctorial papers resulting from these small, 
curious items. The fact that some little analysis has been done would be to 
verify the worthiness of the items for such research. They would have to show 
enough "strangeness" to warrent a research project.
This is something profs are always looking for to 
further education and give students new and unusual items to fathom and pry 
information from.
I too, would like to see some classifications get 
done in a more timely manner, but I also support educational 
endevors.
Mark

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Charles R. Viau 

  To: 'Pekka Savolainen' ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; 'Meteorite-list 
  Meteoritecentral' 
  Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:38 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Elma 
  status
  
  
  Pekka, 
  Robert Verish and Robert Matson 
  had some excellent comments on this, and I wanted to comment back to 
  each…
  
  For Pekka,
   
  Thanks for sharing that data. The chemical analysis looks somewhat 
  similar to what I have been told , but does 
  vary. Some people I have talked 
  to thought that the total absence of MgO and MnO were just as strange. Some said 
  that these were also 
  common impurities in slag, especially in minerals related to Ilmenite, and the ratio’s and streak did not match. Also, 
  the physical characteristics of the individual pieces seemed to have a very 
  thin, even coating of the glass and that a slag would most likely be 
  homogenous or glass on one side with material on the other… who knows. It is real strange and I think that 
  what bothers the analysts the most is that they cannot explain how it was 
  made. I think an electrical or 
  plasma mechanism is really interesting and wonder if 
  there is even enough existing data on such phenomena to help them there as 
  well. I also hope that the resulting analysis won’t require a PhD in petrology 
  to decipher… J 
  
  
  For Robert M and 
  Robert V,
   
  I agree that there should be a priority for those that have worked so 
  hard and have material in a queue to be examined. I wonder if the analysts 
  themselves are really kind of their own boss, and perhaps take on what they 
  feel is easy to disprove first, and then get wrapped up in the enigma of 
  trying to prove just what it is when it cannot be easily explained. And/or it 
  was the immediacy of the Elma event, the story content and the speed in which 
  samples were available to them…In any case, the NWA thing has hurt a lot of 
  research and NASA should never have shut the doors on domestic researchers 
  that have finds that have been properly documented. What they needed to do was 
  put someone in charge of clearing these finds from the NWA imports based on 
  the documentation and credibility of the finders.
  
  Thanks,
  Charles, IMCA 
  4351
  
  


RE: [meteorite-list] Elma status and other interesting things.

2003-08-26 Thread Charles R. Viau
Robert,
Post away, but please refrain from the asphalt and tar
non-sense; it's gone way beyond that...

Adam and list,

Thanks Adam, I had fun doing them and eagerly await seeing what
a SEM scan shows of that material as well as the comments from the
examiners.

In another subject:

I just got back from a 9 day excursion in Utah exploring the
known KT exposure areas in the Wasatch Plateau, Spanish Fork and the
grand staircase through Escalante on up to Capitol Reef.  What
incredible places these are and it is somewhat overwhelming. Special
thanks to Dr Tony Ekdale (U of U) for his response to my inquiries prior
to my trip and his excellent tips.  Additional thanks to Dr. Robert L.
Eves, (SUU) for the excellent road logs and grand staircase stratigraphy
details. It is amazing what you can find on main routes, however, the
off-road trips were absolutely fascinating.
.
I have collected some great sample material (with permission, US
national parks and Utah Geological Survey, Dept of Natural Resources)
and took a few hundred 35mm and digital images. It will take some time
to compile everything in a reasonable journal and once completed, I
would like to share it with list members who would be interested. I
think the subject matter shares at least equal with meteoritics and
geology, so I will post the links to a geology list as well.  Utah is an
incredible state with a wealth of natural resources and I look forward
to spending some more time there.

Regards

Charles Viau IMCA 4351

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Verish
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 5:20 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [meteorite-list] Elma status

Charles R. Viau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
and while probably not a meteorite by definition...
?

...if the word ELMA bothers you, delete
this message and please don't respond to the list.  
!
-

Be advised, Charles!   It isn't just Farmer that has a
problem with this subject

 and I just may have to respond to this list...,

 (but I've decided to take my post to bed with me
and sleep on it ;-)  until the morning... 

...unless another List dedicated only to meteor-wrongs

comes on-line overnight!
[Yes, I know about that other List, but that's for
members only]

Have a Good Morning All,
Bob V. 

[meteorite-list] Elma status 
Charles R. Viau [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Mon, 25 Aug 2003 01:57:33 -0400 

Previous message: [meteorite-list] Elma status 
Next message: [meteorite-list] Ebay Meteorite - AD 
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [
author ] 




This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

--=_NextPart_000_000A_01C36AAC.4342B430
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Sonny and List,
 
The Elma whatever objects remains a
mystery, and while
probably not a meteorite by definition, remains a very
seriously studied
material by a number of leading labs and scientists. 
There are papers due out on this material soon and we
will just have to wait to see what the professional
world has to say about it.  Many have already seen
some
preliminary chemistry results that were posted, as
well as some microprobe results. If you get into that
stuff, then you can probably see why there is so much
controversy over the origin of this material.
Equally interesting are some of the low power
microscope images. Adam Hupe had spearheaded the
effort to get this material seen by some of the
best authorities available, and I believe that if not
for his excellent scientific method, this event would
be lost forever.  Adam had requested that I re-post
some imagery I had provided previously for anyone
still
interested in this stuff. A rather low-res composite
page can be found here:
 
http://home.beld.net/~belugaband/images/ElmaComposite.jpg
 
If anyone wants some higher resolution imagery, just
ask, and I will be glad to email them to you.
 
Again the standard disclaimer: if the word ELMA
bothers you, delete
this message and please don't respond to the list.
 
Thanks,
Charles  IMCA 4351




__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Elma status and Tucson Room Rates

2003-08-26 Thread WAHLPERRY
Mike,

Thanks for your reply. I never meant to indicate that I thought it was a meteorite. I am interested to find out what they determined this material to be. And what better source to find out from then the meteorite list.


Charles,

Thanks for your information on the status of the Elma material. I found it to be quite interesting. 



To all members interested in the Tucson room rates please read below. These were the most reasonable we found.

Towneplace Suites By Marriott Tucson $79.00 per nite 888-254-0637. 
Best Western Inn Suites $89.99 with AAA discount. 520-297-8111

Thanks,
 Sonny


RE: [meteorite-list] Elma status

2003-08-25 Thread Charles R. Viau








Hi Sonny and List,



 The
Elma whatever objects remains a mystery, and while probably not a
meteorite by definition, remains a very seriously studied material by a number
of leading labs and scientists. There
are papers due out on this material soon and we will just have to wait to see
what the professional world has to say about it. Many have already seen some preliminary
chemistry results that were posted, as well as some microprobe results. If you
get into that stuff, then you can probably see why there is so much controversy
over the origin of this material. Equally
interesting are some of the low power microscope images. Adam Hupe had
spearheaded the effort to get this material seen by some of the best
authorities available, and I believe that if not for his excellent scientific
method, this event would be lost forever. Adam had requested that I re-post some imagery
I had provided previously for anyone still interested in this stuff. A rather low-res
composite page can be found here:



http://home.beld.net/~belugaband/images/ElmaComposite.jpg



If anyone wants some higher resolution imagery, just ask, and I
will be glad to email them to you.



Again the standard disclaimer: if the word ELMA bothers you,
delete this message and please dont respond to the list.



Thanks,

Charles
IMCA 4351

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 2:28 PM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [meteorite-list] Elma
status



Hi List,

Does anyone have any new information on the Elma material/glass? 

On another subject, there are a few hotels in Tucson with reasonable rates for
next February's show. Many hotels have raised their prices substantially for
that week. We have found a few hotels for $79 per night and are currently
researching the area which would be best suited for a central location. I will
let you know when I get more information.

Thanks,


Sonny








Re: [meteorite-list] Elma status

2003-08-25 Thread Michael Farmer
Answer, Elma is a scam, a waste of time, not a
meteorite. 
All hotels rais their rates for that time of year just
for the Tucson show. 
Mike Farmer
Writing from a place where my thermometer just topped
out at the max of 125 degrees! 
Dreaming of cool Tucson right now. 

--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi List,
 
 Does anyone have any new information on the Elma
 material/glass? 
 
 On another subject, there are a few hotels in Tucson
 with reasonable rates 
 for next February's show. Many hotels have raised
 their prices substantially for 
 that week. We have found a few hotels for $79 per
 night and are currently 
 researching the area which would be best suited for
 a central location. I will 
 let you know when I get more information.
 
 Thanks,
 
Sonny
 


__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-14 Thread Pekka Savolainen




Hello, all,

the ball lightning could be one explanation. In Finland this phenomenon
has stuidied, and some scientists says, a lightning ball could in fact be
burning flint. Anyway, its very difficult to study this phenomenon, but
it should;

- fly free in the air
- move slowly and stay at least several seconds, maximum up to minutes
- size from couple of cm:s to couple of meters
- can explose

After / during ball lightnings has been found at least vaporised metals and
carbon.

So if the theory about the burning flint happens to be true, in Elma-case
this makes
sense to me. First the free flight in the air, the explosion when grounded,
and the 
result is these X-files fragments.

But as Adam said, it might be worthless to speculate before have some more
from the labs.

take care,

pekka

Mark Jackson wrote:

  Dear List,
  
  I personally witnessed ball lightning in the AZ desert only 6 months
ago and it wasprobably the most intense and dramatic event I've ever witnessed.Ball
lightningdoes exist and itcan last for several minutes; the one I saw lasted
over two full minutes. As a matter of fact, the one I witnessed actually
buried itself in the earth so it could not be seen directly but only by the
reflections of colored light from the clouds above it.
  
  Really REALLY weird stuff whatever it is.
  
  Kindest Regards,
  
  Mark
   Do you Yahoo!?
 Free 
online calendar
 with sync to Outlook(TM). 
  
  -- 




Pekka Savolainen
Jokiharjuntie 4
FIN-71330 Rasala
FINLAND

+ 358 400 818 912

Group Home Page: http://www.smartgroups.com/groups/eurocoin
Group Email Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  
  
  


Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-14 Thread Adam Hupe
Hi Tom and List,

The problem with this material is that it does not contain any metal.  If it
was in a reducing environment why isn't there any metal, even at microprobe
levels?  This almost certainly eliminates this material coming from an
industrial process, at least none that I have ever heard of.  If it came
from a foundry why wasn't the sand melted in the center.  The sand is also
trapped in sealed vesicles, that look almost like chondrules, like a
condensation product, which is extremely odd.  It was extremely difficult to
make thin-sections of this stuff because of the friability of the material
trapped inside.

Will update as we get more results,

Adam


- Original Message -
From: Tom aka James Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: meteor central [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


 Hello All, This Elma stuff sounds like a metal casting bi-product from a
 foundry. Is there a foundry in our around Elma?
 Thanks, Tom
 Peregrineflier 
 The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
 - Original Message -
 From: mafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: meteor central [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:30 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


  fulguritic? given a sighting of a smoking trail and smoldering pieces of
  basaltic glass with sand inside, sounds like some atmospheric event
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:22 PM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
   Hi Mike, Mike and List,
  
   The Elma material is definitely not a meteorite, so to speak.  It
could
   prove to be just as or more interesting to the scientific community.
 The
   jury is still out on exactly what this material is or how it was
 created.
   The initial lab results created more questions than answers. As has
been
   reported this material consist of sand incased in a basaltic glass
 shell.
   The materials in the glass are not separated into swirls so what ever
   created these objects had a huge amount of energy and the glass was
  quenched
   very rapidly. Experiments are being conducted to see how these might
 have
   been created.  We should have more answers by next week.  This is
 looking
   more like an X-files episode than a meteor sighting.  For now, we are
   keeping an open mind regarding this material.
  
   All the best,
  
   Adam and Greg Hupe
  
  
  
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Meteorite List
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:35 PM
   Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
  
  
Mike, forget about this one, there is not a chance in hell that a
   meteorite
was recovered there.
Mike Farmer
- Original Message -
From: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Meteorite List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:35 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
   
   
 Everyone-
Is this all said and done with or is the jury still
 out with any maybe's?
 Thanks,
 Mike

 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
 http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


   
   
   
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
  
  
   __
   Meteorite-list mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
  
  
 
 
 
  __
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 




__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-14 Thread Adam Hupe
Hi Tom,

No glass manufacturing process would use this kind of sand because of it
impurities and why would glass be spread into a shot-put pit where kids
could get cut on the sharp edges?  I am not going to speculate too much more
until we get more lab results.  Two other labs have weighed in on this
occurrence and it just keeps getting odder.

All the best,

Adam


- Original Message -
From: Tom aka James Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


 Hello All, How about a glass manufacturing bi-product?
 Thanks, Tom
 Peregrineflier 
 The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
 - Original Message -
 From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:08 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


  Hi Tom and List,
 
  The problem with this material is that it does not contain any metal.
If
 it
  was in a reducing environment why isn't there any metal, even at
 microprobe
  levels?  This almost certainly eliminates this material coming from an
  industrial process, at least none that I have ever heard of.  If it came
  from a foundry why wasn't the sand melted in the center.  The sand is
also
  trapped in sealed vesicles, that look almost like chondrules, like a
  condensation product, which is extremely odd.  It was extremely
difficult
 to
  make thin-sections of this stuff because of the friability of the
material
  trapped inside.
 
  Will update as we get more results,
 
  Adam
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Tom aka James Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: mafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: meteor central [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:39 PM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
   Hello All, This Elma stuff sounds like a metal casting bi-product from
a
   foundry. Is there a foundry in our around Elma?
   Thanks, Tom
   Peregrineflier 
   The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
   - Original Message -
   From: mafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Cc: meteor central [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:30 PM
   Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
  
  
fulguritic? given a sighting of a smoking trail and smoldering
pieces
 of
basaltic glass with sand inside, sounds like some atmospheric
event
   
- Original Message -
From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
   
   
 Hi Mike, Mike and List,

 The Elma material is definitely not a meteorite, so to speak.  It
  could
 prove to be just as or more interesting to the scientific
community.
   The
 jury is still out on exactly what this material is or how it was
   created.
 The initial lab results created more questions than answers. As
has
  been
 reported this material consist of sand incased in a basaltic glass
   shell.
 The materials in the glass are not separated into swirls so what
 ever
 created these objects had a huge amount of energy and the glass
was
quenched
 very rapidly. Experiments are being conducted to see how these
might
   have
 been created.  We should have more answers by next week.  This is
   looking
 more like an X-files episode than a meteor sighting.  For now, we
 are
 keeping an open mind regarding this material.

 All the best,

 Adam and Greg Hupe




 - Original Message -
 From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Meteorite List
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:35 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


  Mike, forget about this one, there is not a chance in hell that
a
 meteorite
  was recovered there.
  Mike Farmer
  - Original Message -
  From: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Meteorite List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:35 PM
  Subject: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
   Everyone-
  Is this all said and done with or is the jury still
   out with any maybe's?
   Thanks,
   Mike
  
   __
   Do you Yahoo!?
   Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design
software
   http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
  
   __
   Meteorite-list mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
  
  
 
 
 
  __
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-14 Thread Dave Andrews
Ball lightning?  I've seen it before and it could possibly fool people 
into thinking it is a meteor.  Now about making some type of fulgurite, 
I couldn't tell you.

Just a thought.

Dave

Adam Hupe wrote:

Hi Tom and List,

The problem with this material is that it does not contain any metal.  If it
was in a reducing environment why isn't there any metal, even at microprobe
levels?  This almost certainly eliminates this material coming from an
industrial process, at least none that I have ever heard of.  If it came
from a foundry why wasn't the sand melted in the center.  The sand is also
trapped in sealed vesicles, that look almost like chondrules, like a
condensation product, which is extremely odd.  It was extremely difficult to
make thin-sections of this stuff because of the friability of the material
trapped inside.
Will update as we get more results,

Adam

- Original Message -
From: Tom aka James Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: meteor central [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 

Hello All, This Elma stuff sounds like a metal casting bi-product from a
foundry. Is there a foundry in our around Elma?
Thanks, Tom
Peregrineflier 
The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
- Original Message -
From: mafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: meteor central [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
   

fulguritic? given a sighting of a smoking trail and smoldering pieces of
basaltic glass with sand inside, sounds like some atmospheric event
- Original Message -
From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 

Hi Mike, Mike and List,

The Elma material is definitely not a meteorite, so to speak.  It
   

could
 

prove to be just as or more interesting to the scientific community.
   

The
   

jury is still out on exactly what this material is or how it was
   

created.
   

The initial lab results created more questions than answers. As has
   

been
 

reported this material consist of sand incased in a basaltic glass
   

shell.
   

The materials in the glass are not separated into swirls so what ever
created these objects had a huge amount of energy and the glass was
   

quenched
 

very rapidly. Experiments are being conducted to see how these might
   

have
   

been created.  We should have more answers by next week.  This is
   

looking
   

more like an X-files episode than a meteor sighting.  For now, we are
keeping an open mind regarding this material.
All the best,

Adam and Greg Hupe



- Original Message -
From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Meteorite List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
   

Mike, forget about this one, there is not a chance in hell that a
 

meteorite
   

was recovered there.
Mike Farmer
- Original Message -
From: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Meteorite List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:35 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 

Everyone-
  Is this all said and done with or is the jury still
out with any maybe's?
Thanks,
Mike
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
   

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
   

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 

   



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


 



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-14 Thread Tom aka James Knudson
Hello All, How about a glass manufacturing bi-product?
Thanks, Tom
Peregrineflier 
The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
- Original Message -
From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


 Hi Tom and List,

 The problem with this material is that it does not contain any metal.  If
it
 was in a reducing environment why isn't there any metal, even at
microprobe
 levels?  This almost certainly eliminates this material coming from an
 industrial process, at least none that I have ever heard of.  If it came
 from a foundry why wasn't the sand melted in the center.  The sand is also
 trapped in sealed vesicles, that look almost like chondrules, like a
 condensation product, which is extremely odd.  It was extremely difficult
to
 make thin-sections of this stuff because of the friability of the material
 trapped inside.

 Will update as we get more results,

 Adam


 - Original Message -
 From: Tom aka James Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: mafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: meteor central [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:39 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


  Hello All, This Elma stuff sounds like a metal casting bi-product from a
  foundry. Is there a foundry in our around Elma?
  Thanks, Tom
  Peregrineflier 
  The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
  - Original Message -
  From: mafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: meteor central [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:30 PM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
   fulguritic? given a sighting of a smoking trail and smoldering pieces
of
   basaltic glass with sand inside, sounds like some atmospheric event
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:22 PM
   Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
  
  
Hi Mike, Mike and List,
   
The Elma material is definitely not a meteorite, so to speak.  It
 could
prove to be just as or more interesting to the scientific community.
  The
jury is still out on exactly what this material is or how it was
  created.
The initial lab results created more questions than answers. As has
 been
reported this material consist of sand incased in a basaltic glass
  shell.
The materials in the glass are not separated into swirls so what
ever
created these objects had a huge amount of energy and the glass was
   quenched
very rapidly. Experiments are being conducted to see how these might
  have
been created.  We should have more answers by next week.  This is
  looking
more like an X-files episode than a meteor sighting.  For now, we
are
keeping an open mind regarding this material.
   
All the best,
   
Adam and Greg Hupe
   
   
   
   
- Original Message -
From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Meteorite List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
   
   
 Mike, forget about this one, there is not a chance in hell that a
meteorite
 was recovered there.
 Mike Farmer
 - Original Message -
 From: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Meteorite List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:35 PM
 Subject: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


  Everyone-
 Is this all said and done with or is the jury still
  out with any maybe's?
  Thanks,
  Mike
 
  __
  Do you Yahoo!?
  Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
  http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
 
  __
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 



 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
   
   
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
   
   
  
  
  
   __
   Meteorite-list mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
  
 
 


 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list




__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


RE: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-14 Thread M come Meteorite Meteorites
Hello all

I waited with anxiety the result of the fake Elma
meteorite, alone to see the face of who sold this
material on ebay teasing the people and now know that
does not exist any Elma meteorite.  
Regards

Matteo

--- Charles R. Viau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 If this is what the List members want.  I will
 simply will not post
 future results obtained in the lab regarding this
 material, pretty
 simple, no need for you and Mike to get nasty
 
 This is NOT what this list member wants.  This is
 supposed to be a
 free-format forum where people who share the same
 passion get to share
 their experiences with peers. I have a major
 objection to being denied
 information that I am interested in, just because
 some people feel it is
 ok to show such disrespect to someone just because
 the subject does not
 gel with their personal view of what is important.
 Think about that -
 They only future information you will get is exactly
 what you want to
 hear. Isn't that F($%!$ scientific!
 
 Charlyv
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Adam
 Hupe
 Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 10:19 PM
 To: Tom aka James Knudson
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 Hi Tom and List members,
 
 I am only responding because a problem seems to be
 developing here.
 Mike
 Farmer claims scientists are wasting their time on
 this material and
 that
 this is a waste of bandwidth on the List.  The
 scientists are the ones
 who
 dispatched us to bring this material to them.  The
 University of
 Washington
 is studying this material own their own and we are
 simply assisting by
 bringing material in.  If you look at the archives I
 did not initiate
 this
 Elma status chain, I simply responded to a
 question.  You propagated
 this
 long string by asking several questions which were
 posted to the list.
 Since they were posted to the List I responded
 publicly.  If this means
 I am
 wasting bandwidth you are just as guilty by posting
 questions to the
 list.
 
 If this is what the List members want.  I will
 simply will not post
 future
 results obtained in the lab regarding this material,
 pretty simple, no
 need
 for you and Mike to get nasty.
 
 All the best,
 
 Adam
 
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Tom aka James Knudson
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Adam
 Hupe
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:31 AM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
  Hello List, Mike wrote;
  , I am simply offended by people wasting
  scientific time with nonsense, especially now when
 it can take years
 to
 get
  a simple classification.
 
  I have to agree with mike here.  Adam and Greg
 said this was not a
 meteorite
  in the beginning, and I think they would know!
 But, I for one, have
 been
  chastised big time for posting OT things to the
 list. There was not a
 fall
  in Elma and the things the people from Elma are
 claiming to meteorites
 are
  not meteorites and in my opinion have no place on
 the list. I am
 interested
  in the end result, but until then, I think we
 should save Art some
 bandwidth
  on this subject.
 
  Thanks, Tom
  Peregrineflier 
  The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
  - Original Message -
  From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:12 AM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
   Ok Adam, tell us all, where did you get your
 science degree? Oh I
 forgot,
   you have none, so please stop playing scientist.
   I don't have a closed mind, I am simply offended
 by people wasting
   scientific time with nonsense, especially now
 when it can take years
 to
  get
   a simple classification.
   Mike Farmer
   - Original Message -
   From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 1:40 AM
   Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
  
  
Hey Mike and Dear List,
   
Ex and current NASA scientist know the
 difference between tar and
 glass.
Maybe you should have an open mind because you
 would be blown away
 by
  the
lab results if you truly understood
 mineralogy.  This is
 definitely
 not
   tar,
only somebody with a closed mind and no
 understanding of chemistry
 would
make such a statement, go back to school.
   
Adam
   
- Original Message -
From: Michael Farmer
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Charles R. Viau [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Adam
 Hupe'
[EMAIL PROTECTED];
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
   
   
 Well, It CANNOT be a tekite, tektites are
 made by large impacts
  melting
the
 impacted rock. these were found in a
 telephone pole! My god,
 every
telephone
 pole I have ever seen is covered in tar or
 whatever weird

Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-14 Thread Michael Farmer
Mike, forget about this one, there is not a chance in hell that a meteorite
was recovered there.
Mike Farmer
- Original Message - 
From: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Meteorite List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:35 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


 Everyone-
Is this all said and done with or is the jury still
 out with any maybe's?
 Thanks,
 Mike

 __
 Do you Yahoo!?
 Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
 http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list





__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-14 Thread Mark Jackson
Dear List,

I personally witnessed ball lightning in the AZ desert only 6 months ago and it wasprobably the most intense and dramatic event I've ever witnessed.Ball lightningdoes exist and itcan last for several minutes; the one I saw lasted over two full minutes. As a matter of fact, the one I witnessed actually buried itself in the earth so it could not be seen directly but only by the reflections of colored light from the clouds above it.

Really REALLY weird stuff whatever it is.

Kindest Regards,

Mark
Do you Yahoo!?
Free online calendar with sync to Outlook(TM).

Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-14 Thread Michael Farmer
Ok Adam, tell us all, where did you get your science degree? Oh I forgot,
you have none, so please stop playing scientist.
I don't have a closed mind, I am simply offended by people wasting
scientific time with nonsense, especially now when it can take years to get
a simple classification.
Mike Farmer
- Original Message - 
From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 1:40 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


 Hey Mike and Dear List,

 Ex and current NASA scientist know the difference between tar and glass.
 Maybe you should have an open mind because you would be blown away by the
 lab results if you truly understood mineralogy.  This is definitely not
tar,
 only somebody with a closed mind and no understanding of chemistry would
 make such a statement, go back to school.

 Adam

 - Original Message -
 From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Charles R. Viau [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Adam Hupe'
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:14 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


  Well, It CANNOT be a tekite, tektites are made by large impacts melting
 the
  impacted rock. these were found in a telephone pole! My god, every
 telephone
  pole I have ever seen is covered in tar or whatever weird melted black
 stuff
  they use, sort of like tar on house roofs, which I believe that the
Hupes
  also found in the debris from my printer-smashing Park Forest. H
 tiny
  little melted tektites found on the floor under the smashed shingles and
  tarred roof, more little melted glass like tektites found in and round
a
  telephone pole at the site of a stupid hoax that got way more attention
 than
  it should have. I see a curious pattern forming here.  Maybe there were
 some
  bugs smashed into the tar so we have little spidy creatures like the
  Frass meteorite.
 Charles. I have never heard of you, but I assure you that I know
 just
  a tad more than you might think, and I assure you that this is a waste
of
  scientific time.
  It defies the most simple things that we know about meteorites, thus
 making
  it bogus.
 
  Mike Farmer
  - Original Message -
  From: Charles R. Viau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: 'Michael Farmer' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Adam Hupe'
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:35 PM
  Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
   Given the reputation of the people examining this stuff, how busy they
   are, and the amount of time they are willing to spend on this - It's
not
   crap. It is probably more related to a tektite than anything else if
one
   were to summon up a simile , and how did pieces of this wind up
embedded
   in a telephone pole? - I think the Hupe brothers , as well as the
PhD's
   in those labs are doing their job because they believe there is
   scientific merit in doing so, and no matter what the outcome, they
need
   to know what it is because it passed through the filters that would
have
   tossed 'crap' out 2 weeks ago. Perhaps, if you had some of this stuff
   you might feel different.
  
   Charlyv
  
   -Original Message-
   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Michael
   Farmer
   Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:35 PM
   To: Adam Hupe; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
  
   Give me a break people, this is retarded. Yep, YE HAA PA saw that
there
   little glass chunks fall out of the sky and they burnded my hands two
   weeks
   later!
   Why waste time on this crap.
   Mike Farmer
   - Original Message -
   From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:26 PM
   Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
  
  
Hi Tom,
   
No glass manufacturing process would use this kind of sand because
of
   it
impurities and why would glass be spread into a shot-put pit where
   kids
could get cut on the sharp edges?  I am not going to speculate too
   much
   more
until we get more lab results.  Two other labs have weighed in on
this
occurrence and it just keeps getting odder.
   
All the best,
   
Adam
   
   
- Original Message -
From: Tom aka James Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
   
   
 Hello All, How about a glass manufacturing bi-product?
 Thanks, Tom
 Peregrineflier 
 The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
 - Original Message -
 From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:08 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


  Hi Tom and List,
 
  The problem with this material is that it does not contain any
   metal.
If
 it
  was in a reducing

Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-14 Thread mafer
fulguritic? given a sighting of a smoking trail and smoldering pieces of
basaltic glass with sand inside, sounds like some atmospheric event

- Original Message -
From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


 Hi Mike, Mike and List,

 The Elma material is definitely not a meteorite, so to speak.  It could
 prove to be just as or more interesting to the scientific community.  The
 jury is still out on exactly what this material is or how it was created.
 The initial lab results created more questions than answers. As has been
 reported this material consist of sand incased in a basaltic glass shell.
 The materials in the glass are not separated into swirls so what ever
 created these objects had a huge amount of energy and the glass was
quenched
 very rapidly. Experiments are being conducted to see how these might have
 been created.  We should have more answers by next week.  This is looking
 more like an X-files episode than a meteor sighting.  For now, we are
 keeping an open mind regarding this material.

 All the best,

 Adam and Greg Hupe




 - Original Message -
 From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Meteorite List
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:35 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


  Mike, forget about this one, there is not a chance in hell that a
 meteorite
  was recovered there.
  Mike Farmer
  - Original Message -
  From: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Meteorite List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:35 PM
  Subject: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
   Everyone-
  Is this all said and done with or is the jury still
   out with any maybe's?
   Thanks,
   Mike
  
   __
   Do you Yahoo!?
   Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
   http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
  
   __
   Meteorite-list mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
  
  
 
 
 
  __
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list





__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-14 Thread Tom aka James Knudson
Hello everybody, Adam wrote;
As has been
reported this material consist of sand incased in a basaltic glass shell.

Sounds like the frass meteorite, was there any living organisms inside with
the sand? Be sure to be suited up in protective gear when handling This Elma
stuff!

Thanks, Tom
Peregrineflier 
The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
- Original Message -
From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


 Hi Mike, Mike and List,

 The Elma material is definitely not a meteorite, so to speak.  It could
 prove to be just as or more interesting to the scientific community.  The
 jury is still out on exactly what this material is or how it was created.
 The initial lab results created more questions than answers. As has been
 reported this material consist of sand incased in a basaltic glass shell.
 The materials in the glass are not separated into swirls so what ever
 created these objects had a huge amount of energy and the glass was
quenched
 very rapidly. Experiments are being conducted to see how these might have
 been created.  We should have more answers by next week.  This is looking
 more like an X-files episode than a meteor sighting.  For now, we are
 keeping an open mind regarding this material.

 All the best,

 Adam and Greg Hupe




 - Original Message -
 From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Meteorite List
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:35 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


  Mike, forget about this one, there is not a chance in hell that a
 meteorite
  was recovered there.
  Mike Farmer
  - Original Message -
  From: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Meteorite List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:35 PM
  Subject: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
   Everyone-
  Is this all said and done with or is the jury still
   out with any maybe's?
   Thanks,
   Mike
  
   __
   Do you Yahoo!?
   Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
   http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
  
   __
   Meteorite-list mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
  
  
 
 
 
  __
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list




__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-14 Thread David Freeman
Dear Elma Statisticians;
I still follow the instinct that guides me in the direction of some 
industrial, or environmental  deposition from industry, air travel, or 
other man related waste product.  Though not having been to Park Forest 
specifically, the concentration of humans and industry with in a 100 
mile radius of the area, and of the visual impact of the air and water, 
would certainly offer indication that any anomalous substance could come 
from human/industrial origin.  Gary Indiana is not that far away, and 
historically, it is a giant boiling tea kettle of environmental questions.
Has there been an attempt to search a grid pattern outside of the 
inferred strewnfield for  like specimens?  A controlled experiment zone 
to prove that the unknowns are ONLY in the affected area would be quite 
useful.  Again, I wonder where the nearest large incinerator is to the 
area.  Foundries, aggregate dryers, blast furnaces all seemingly would 
emit something during casualty situationsOR,
X-files, how about Soylent Green?
Good morning,
Dave Freeman

M come Meteorite Meteorites wrote:

Ohhh well well.

Matteo

--- Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi Mike, Mike and List,

The Elma material is definitely not a meteorite, so
to speak.  It could
prove to be just as or more interesting to the
scientific community.  The
jury is still out on exactly what this material is
or how it was created.
The initial lab results created more questions than
answers. As has been
reported this material consist of sand incased in a
basaltic glass shell.
The materials in the glass are not separated into
swirls so what ever
created these objects had a huge amount of energy
and the glass was quenched
very rapidly. Experiments are being conducted to see
how these might have
been created.  We should have more answers by next
week.  This is looking
more like an X-files episode than a meteor sighting.
For now, we are
keeping an open mind regarding this material.
All the best,

Adam and Greg Hupe



- Original Message -
From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Meteorite
List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

Mike, forget about this one, there is not a chance

in hell that a
meteorite
was recovered there.
Mike Farmer
- Original Message -
From: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Meteorite List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:35 PM
Subject: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

Everyone-
  Is this all said and done with or is the jury
still

out with any maybe's?
Thanks,
Mike
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site
design software

http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list




__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list

=
M come Meteorite - Matteo Chinellato
Via Triestina 126/A - 30030 - TESSERA, VENEZIA, ITALY
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sale Site: http://www.mcomemeteorite.com Collection Site: 
http://www.mcomemeteorite.info
International Meteorite Collectors Association #2140
MSN Messanger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EBAY.COM:http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/mcomemeteorite/
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list



__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-14 Thread Adam Hupe
Hi Tom and List,

Nope, no spiders, leaves or any other organic material was found as in the
famous Frass unit.

All the best,

Adam


- Original Message -
From: Tom aka James Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


 Hello everybody, Adam wrote;
 As has been
 reported this material consist of sand incased in a basaltic glass shell.

 Sounds like the frass meteorite, was there any living organisms inside
with
 the sand? Be sure to be suited up in protective gear when handling This
Elma
 stuff!

 Thanks, Tom
 Peregrineflier 
 The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
 - Original Message -
 From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:22 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


  Hi Mike, Mike and List,
 
  The Elma material is definitely not a meteorite, so to speak.  It could
  prove to be just as or more interesting to the scientific community.
The
  jury is still out on exactly what this material is or how it was
created.
  The initial lab results created more questions than answers. As has been
  reported this material consist of sand incased in a basaltic glass
shell.
  The materials in the glass are not separated into swirls so what ever
  created these objects had a huge amount of energy and the glass was
 quenched
  very rapidly. Experiments are being conducted to see how these might
have
  been created.  We should have more answers by next week.  This is
looking
  more like an X-files episode than a meteor sighting.  For now, we are
  keeping an open mind regarding this material.
 
  All the best,
 
  Adam and Greg Hupe
 
 
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Meteorite List
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:35 PM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
   Mike, forget about this one, there is not a chance in hell that a
  meteorite
   was recovered there.
   Mike Farmer
   - Original Message -
   From: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Meteorite List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:35 PM
   Subject: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
  
  
Everyone-
   Is this all said and done with or is the jury still
out with any maybe's?
Thanks,
Mike
   
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
   
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
   
   
  
  
  
   __
   Meteorite-list mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 
  __
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 




__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-11 Thread Adam Hupe
Hi Tom and List members,

I am only responding because a problem seems to be developing here.  Mike
Farmer claims scientists are wasting their time on this material and that
this is a waste of bandwidth on the List.  The scientists are the ones who
dispatched us to bring this material to them.  The University of Washington
is studying this material own their own and we are simply assisting by
bringing material in.  If you look at the archives I did not initiate this
Elma status chain, I simply responded to a question.  You propagated this
long string by asking several questions which were posted to the list.
Since they were posted to the List I responded publicly.  If this means I am
wasting bandwidth you are just as guilty by posting questions to the list.

If this is what the List members want.  I will simply will not post future
results obtained in the lab regarding this material, pretty simple, no need
for you and Mike to get nasty.

All the best,

Adam



- Original Message -
From: Tom aka James Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Adam Hupe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


 Hello List, Mike wrote;
 , I am simply offended by people wasting
 scientific time with nonsense, especially now when it can take years to
get
 a simple classification.

 I have to agree with mike here.  Adam and Greg said this was not a
meteorite
 in the beginning, and I think they would know! But, I for one, have been
 chastised big time for posting OT things to the list. There was not a fall
 in Elma and the things the people from Elma are claiming to meteorites are
 not meteorites and in my opinion have no place on the list. I am
interested
 in the end result, but until then, I think we should save Art some
bandwidth
 on this subject.

 Thanks, Tom
 Peregrineflier 
 The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
 - Original Message -
 From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:12 AM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


  Ok Adam, tell us all, where did you get your science degree? Oh I
forgot,
  you have none, so please stop playing scientist.
  I don't have a closed mind, I am simply offended by people wasting
  scientific time with nonsense, especially now when it can take years to
 get
  a simple classification.
  Mike Farmer
  - Original Message -
  From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 1:40 AM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
   Hey Mike and Dear List,
  
   Ex and current NASA scientist know the difference between tar and
glass.
   Maybe you should have an open mind because you would be blown away by
 the
   lab results if you truly understood mineralogy.  This is definitely
not
  tar,
   only somebody with a closed mind and no understanding of chemistry
would
   make such a statement, go back to school.
  
   Adam
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Charles R. Viau [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Adam Hupe'
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:14 PM
   Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
  
  
Well, It CANNOT be a tekite, tektites are made by large impacts
 melting
   the
impacted rock. these were found in a telephone pole! My god, every
   telephone
pole I have ever seen is covered in tar or whatever weird melted
black
   stuff
they use, sort of like tar on house roofs, which I believe that the
  Hupes
also found in the debris from my printer-smashing Park Forest.
H
   tiny
little melted tektites found on the floor under the smashed shingles
 and
tarred roof, more little melted glass like tektites found in and
 round
  a
telephone pole at the site of a stupid hoax that got way more
 attention
   than
it should have. I see a curious pattern forming here.  Maybe there
 were
   some
bugs smashed into the tar so we have little spidy creatures like
 the
Frass meteorite.
   Charles. I have never heard of you, but I assure you that I
 know
   just
a tad more than you might think, and I assure you that this is a
waste
  of
scientific time.
It defies the most simple things that we know about meteorites, thus
   making
it bogus.
   
Mike Farmer
- Original Message -
From: Charles R. Viau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Michael Farmer' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Adam Hupe'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:35 PM
Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
   
   
 Given the reputation of the people examining this stuff, how busy
 they
 are, and the amount of time they are willing to spend on this -
It's
  not
 crap. It is probably more related to a tektite than anything else

Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-10 Thread Tom aka James Knudson
Hello All, This Elma stuff sounds like a metal casting bi-product from a
foundry. Is there a foundry in our around Elma?
Thanks, Tom
Peregrineflier 
The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
- Original Message -
From: mafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: meteor central [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


 fulguritic? given a sighting of a smoking trail and smoldering pieces of
 basaltic glass with sand inside, sounds like some atmospheric event

 - Original Message -
 From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:22 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


  Hi Mike, Mike and List,
 
  The Elma material is definitely not a meteorite, so to speak.  It could
  prove to be just as or more interesting to the scientific community.
The
  jury is still out on exactly what this material is or how it was
created.
  The initial lab results created more questions than answers. As has been
  reported this material consist of sand incased in a basaltic glass
shell.
  The materials in the glass are not separated into swirls so what ever
  created these objects had a huge amount of energy and the glass was
 quenched
  very rapidly. Experiments are being conducted to see how these might
have
  been created.  We should have more answers by next week.  This is
looking
  more like an X-files episode than a meteor sighting.  For now, we are
  keeping an open mind regarding this material.
 
  All the best,
 
  Adam and Greg Hupe
 
 
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Meteorite List
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:35 PM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
   Mike, forget about this one, there is not a chance in hell that a
  meteorite
   was recovered there.
   Mike Farmer
   - Original Message -
   From: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Meteorite List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:35 PM
   Subject: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
  
  
Everyone-
   Is this all said and done with or is the jury still
out with any maybe's?
Thanks,
Mike
   
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
   
__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
   
   
  
  
  
   __
   Meteorite-list mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 
  __
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 



 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list




__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-10 Thread Michael Farmer
Give me a break people, this is retarded. Yep, YE HAA PA saw that there
little glass chunks fall out of the sky and they burnded my hands two weeks
later!
Why waste time on this crap.
Mike Farmer
- Original Message - 
From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


 Hi Tom,

 No glass manufacturing process would use this kind of sand because of it
 impurities and why would glass be spread into a shot-put pit where kids
 could get cut on the sharp edges?  I am not going to speculate too much
more
 until we get more lab results.  Two other labs have weighed in on this
 occurrence and it just keeps getting odder.

 All the best,

 Adam


 - Original Message -
 From: Tom aka James Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:17 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


  Hello All, How about a glass manufacturing bi-product?
  Thanks, Tom
  Peregrineflier 
  The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
  - Original Message -
  From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:08 PM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
   Hi Tom and List,
  
   The problem with this material is that it does not contain any metal.
 If
  it
   was in a reducing environment why isn't there any metal, even at
  microprobe
   levels?  This almost certainly eliminates this material coming from an
   industrial process, at least none that I have ever heard of.  If it
came
   from a foundry why wasn't the sand melted in the center.  The sand is
 also
   trapped in sealed vesicles, that look almost like chondrules, like a
   condensation product, which is extremely odd.  It was extremely
 difficult
  to
   make thin-sections of this stuff because of the friability of the
 material
   trapped inside.
  
   Will update as we get more results,
  
   Adam
  
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Tom aka James Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: mafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Adam Hupe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Cc: meteor central [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:39 PM
   Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
  
  
Hello All, This Elma stuff sounds like a metal casting bi-product
from
 a
foundry. Is there a foundry in our around Elma?
Thanks, Tom
Peregrineflier 
The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
- Original Message -
From: mafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: meteor central [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
   
   
 fulguritic? given a sighting of a smoking trail and smoldering
 pieces
  of
 basaltic glass with sand inside, sounds like some atmospheric
 event

 - Original Message -
 From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:22 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


  Hi Mike, Mike and List,
 
  The Elma material is definitely not a meteorite, so to speak.
It
   could
  prove to be just as or more interesting to the scientific
 community.
The
  jury is still out on exactly what this material is or how it was
created.
  The initial lab results created more questions than answers. As
 has
   been
  reported this material consist of sand incased in a basaltic
glass
shell.
  The materials in the glass are not separated into swirls so what
  ever
  created these objects had a huge amount of energy and the glass
 was
 quenched
  very rapidly. Experiments are being conducted to see how these
 might
have
  been created.  We should have more answers by next week.  This
is
looking
  more like an X-files episode than a meteor sighting.  For now,
we
  are
  keeping an open mind regarding this material.
 
  All the best,
 
  Adam and Greg Hupe
 
 
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Meteorite List
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:35 PM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
   Mike, forget about this one, there is not a chance in hell
that
 a
  meteorite
   was recovered there.
   Mike Farmer
   - Original Message -
   From: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Meteorite List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:35 PM
   Subject: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
  
  
Everyone-
   Is this all said and done with or is the jury still
out with any maybe's?
Thanks,
Mike
   
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site

Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-08 Thread Michael Farmer
Adam and everyone, here is my take on this simply put. I am not trying to
cause problems with this, just show that people in this community need to
stick together to assist the meteoritical society process, study, and
publish meteorites in a timely manner.
We all get a kick out of all the kooks and wackos trying to scam dealers,
collectors, and scientists. We all laugh at them, harass them on ebay etc.
Now, Adam, you said when you went there that this was not a meteorite, there
was not a sign of a meteorite, and yet you are now submitting samples of
strange crap that you know is not a meteorite. The best thing in my opinion
would be to walk away from Elma, realize that a scam happened, and forget
about it. Instead you are submitting samples, that are not meteorites. This
causes in a roundabout way, a serious waste of time for scientists.
This can apply to any situation, not just this one.
Mike Farmer
- Original Message - 
From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tom aka James Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


 Hi Tom and List members,

 I am only responding because a problem seems to be developing here.  Mike
 Farmer claims scientists are wasting their time on this material and that
 this is a waste of bandwidth on the List.  The scientists are the ones who
 dispatched us to bring this material to them.  The University of
Washington
 is studying this material own their own and we are simply assisting by
 bringing material in.  If you look at the archives I did not initiate this
 Elma status chain, I simply responded to a question.  You propagated
this
 long string by asking several questions which were posted to the list.
 Since they were posted to the List I responded publicly.  If this means I
am
 wasting bandwidth you are just as guilty by posting questions to the list.

 If this is what the List members want.  I will simply will not post future
 results obtained in the lab regarding this material, pretty simple, no
need
 for you and Mike to get nasty.

 All the best,

 Adam



 - Original Message -
 From: Tom aka James Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Adam Hupe
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:31 AM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


  Hello List, Mike wrote;
  , I am simply offended by people wasting
  scientific time with nonsense, especially now when it can take years to
 get
  a simple classification.
 
  I have to agree with mike here.  Adam and Greg said this was not a
 meteorite
  in the beginning, and I think they would know! But, I for one, have been
  chastised big time for posting OT things to the list. There was not a
fall
  in Elma and the things the people from Elma are claiming to meteorites
are
  not meteorites and in my opinion have no place on the list. I am
 interested
  in the end result, but until then, I think we should save Art some
 bandwidth
  on this subject.
 
  Thanks, Tom
  Peregrineflier 
  The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
  - Original Message -
  From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:12 AM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
   Ok Adam, tell us all, where did you get your science degree? Oh I
 forgot,
   you have none, so please stop playing scientist.
   I don't have a closed mind, I am simply offended by people wasting
   scientific time with nonsense, especially now when it can take years
to
  get
   a simple classification.
   Mike Farmer
   - Original Message -
   From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 1:40 AM
   Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
  
  
Hey Mike and Dear List,
   
Ex and current NASA scientist know the difference between tar and
 glass.
Maybe you should have an open mind because you would be blown away
by
  the
lab results if you truly understood mineralogy.  This is definitely
 not
   tar,
only somebody with a closed mind and no understanding of chemistry
 would
make such a statement, go back to school.
   
Adam
   
- Original Message -
From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Charles R. Viau [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Adam Hupe'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
   
   
 Well, It CANNOT be a tekite, tektites are made by large impacts
  melting
the
 impacted rock. these were found in a telephone pole! My god, every
telephone
 pole I have ever seen is covered in tar or whatever weird melted
 black
stuff
 they use, sort of like tar on house roofs, which I believe that
the
   Hupes
 also found in the debris from my printer-smashing Park Forest.
 H

RE: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-08 Thread Charles R. Viau

If this is what the List members want.  I will simply will not post
future results obtained in the lab regarding this material, pretty
simple, no need for you and Mike to get nasty

This is NOT what this list member wants.  This is supposed to be a
free-format forum where people who share the same passion get to share
their experiences with peers. I have a major objection to being denied
information that I am interested in, just because some people feel it is
ok to show such disrespect to someone just because the subject does not
gel with their personal view of what is important. Think about that -
They only future information you will get is exactly what you want to
hear. Isn't that F($%!$ scientific!

Charlyv

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam
Hupe
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 10:19 PM
To: Tom aka James Knudson
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

Hi Tom and List members,

I am only responding because a problem seems to be developing here.
Mike
Farmer claims scientists are wasting their time on this material and
that
this is a waste of bandwidth on the List.  The scientists are the ones
who
dispatched us to bring this material to them.  The University of
Washington
is studying this material own their own and we are simply assisting by
bringing material in.  If you look at the archives I did not initiate
this
Elma status chain, I simply responded to a question.  You propagated
this
long string by asking several questions which were posted to the list.
Since they were posted to the List I responded publicly.  If this means
I am
wasting bandwidth you are just as guilty by posting questions to the
list.

If this is what the List members want.  I will simply will not post
future
results obtained in the lab regarding this material, pretty simple, no
need
for you and Mike to get nasty.

All the best,

Adam



- Original Message -
From: Tom aka James Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Adam Hupe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:31 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


 Hello List, Mike wrote;
 , I am simply offended by people wasting
 scientific time with nonsense, especially now when it can take years
to
get
 a simple classification.

 I have to agree with mike here.  Adam and Greg said this was not a
meteorite
 in the beginning, and I think they would know! But, I for one, have
been
 chastised big time for posting OT things to the list. There was not a
fall
 in Elma and the things the people from Elma are claiming to meteorites
are
 not meteorites and in my opinion have no place on the list. I am
interested
 in the end result, but until then, I think we should save Art some
bandwidth
 on this subject.

 Thanks, Tom
 Peregrineflier 
 The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
 - Original Message -
 From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:12 AM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


  Ok Adam, tell us all, where did you get your science degree? Oh I
forgot,
  you have none, so please stop playing scientist.
  I don't have a closed mind, I am simply offended by people wasting
  scientific time with nonsense, especially now when it can take years
to
 get
  a simple classification.
  Mike Farmer
  - Original Message -
  From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 1:40 AM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
   Hey Mike and Dear List,
  
   Ex and current NASA scientist know the difference between tar and
glass.
   Maybe you should have an open mind because you would be blown away
by
 the
   lab results if you truly understood mineralogy.  This is
definitely
not
  tar,
   only somebody with a closed mind and no understanding of chemistry
would
   make such a statement, go back to school.
  
   Adam
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Charles R. Viau [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Adam Hupe'
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:14 PM
   Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
  
  
Well, It CANNOT be a tekite, tektites are made by large impacts
 melting
   the
impacted rock. these were found in a telephone pole! My god,
every
   telephone
pole I have ever seen is covered in tar or whatever weird melted
black
   stuff
they use, sort of like tar on house roofs, which I believe that
the
  Hupes
also found in the debris from my printer-smashing Park Forest.
H
   tiny
little melted tektites found on the floor under the smashed
shingles
 and
tarred roof, more little melted glass like tektites found in
and
 round
  a
telephone pole at the site of a stupid hoax that got way more
 attention
   than
it should have. I see

Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-08 Thread Joecuriale
i'm very new to collecting meteorites and to this list...
so, i find it pretty discouraging to have to be subjected to these kinds of 
ugly exchanges... it's very ironic since other posts have talked about helping 
others to gain an interest in this field of collecting when these kind of 
personal assaults would do anything but endear someone... now when a post comes 
and i see one particular person's email address, i cringe and i'm afraid to open 
them because they are so often caustic and judgemental and anything but in 
the spirit of friendship and kindness and mutual interest... no matter what a 
person's personal opinions are, showing some basic respect should be due. could 
you please show more consideration to everyone? thank you.

jc

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-07 Thread M come Meteorite Meteorites
Ohhh well well.

Matteo


--- Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Mike, Mike and List,
 
 The Elma material is definitely not a meteorite, so
 to speak.  It could
 prove to be just as or more interesting to the
 scientific community.  The
 jury is still out on exactly what this material is
 or how it was created.
 The initial lab results created more questions than
 answers. As has been
 reported this material consist of sand incased in a
 basaltic glass shell.
 The materials in the glass are not separated into
 swirls so what ever
 created these objects had a huge amount of energy
 and the glass was quenched
 very rapidly. Experiments are being conducted to see
 how these might have
 been created.  We should have more answers by next
 week.  This is looking
 more like an X-files episode than a meteor sighting.
  For now, we are
 keeping an open mind regarding this material.
 
 All the best,
 
 Adam and Greg Hupe
 
 
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Meteorite
 List
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:35 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
  Mike, forget about this one, there is not a chance
 in hell that a
 meteorite
  was recovered there.
  Mike Farmer
  - Original Message -
  From: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Meteorite List
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:35 PM
  Subject: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
   Everyone-
  Is this all said and done with or is the jury
 still
   out with any maybe's?
   Thanks,
   Mike
  
   __
   Do you Yahoo!?
   Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site
 design software
   http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
  
   __
   Meteorite-list mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  

http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
  
  
 
 
 
  __
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


=
M come Meteorite - Matteo Chinellato
Via Triestina 126/A - 30030 - TESSERA, VENEZIA, ITALY
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sale Site: http://www.mcomemeteorite.com Collection Site: 
http://www.mcomemeteorite.info
International Meteorite Collectors Association #2140
MSN Messanger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
EBAY.COM:http://members.ebay.com/aboutme/mcomemeteorite/

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


RE: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-07 Thread Charles R. Viau
Given the reputation of the people examining this stuff, how busy they
are, and the amount of time they are willing to spend on this - It's not
crap. It is probably more related to a tektite than anything else if one
were to summon up a simile , and how did pieces of this wind up embedded
in a telephone pole? - I think the Hupe brothers , as well as the PhD's
in those labs are doing their job because they believe there is
scientific merit in doing so, and no matter what the outcome, they need
to know what it is because it passed through the filters that would have
tossed 'crap' out 2 weeks ago. Perhaps, if you had some of this stuff
you might feel different.

Charlyv

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael
Farmer
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:35 PM
To: Adam Hupe; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

Give me a break people, this is retarded. Yep, YE HAA PA saw that there
little glass chunks fall out of the sky and they burnded my hands two
weeks
later!
Why waste time on this crap.
Mike Farmer
- Original Message - 
From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


 Hi Tom,

 No glass manufacturing process would use this kind of sand because of
it
 impurities and why would glass be spread into a shot-put pit where
kids
 could get cut on the sharp edges?  I am not going to speculate too
much
more
 until we get more lab results.  Two other labs have weighed in on this
 occurrence and it just keeps getting odder.

 All the best,

 Adam


 - Original Message -
 From: Tom aka James Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:17 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


  Hello All, How about a glass manufacturing bi-product?
  Thanks, Tom
  Peregrineflier 
  The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
  - Original Message -
  From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:08 PM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
   Hi Tom and List,
  
   The problem with this material is that it does not contain any
metal.
 If
  it
   was in a reducing environment why isn't there any metal, even at
  microprobe
   levels?  This almost certainly eliminates this material coming
from an
   industrial process, at least none that I have ever heard of.  If
it
came
   from a foundry why wasn't the sand melted in the center.  The sand
is
 also
   trapped in sealed vesicles, that look almost like chondrules, like
a
   condensation product, which is extremely odd.  It was extremely
 difficult
  to
   make thin-sections of this stuff because of the friability of the
 material
   trapped inside.
  
   Will update as we get more results,
  
   Adam
  
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Tom aka James Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: mafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Adam Hupe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Cc: meteor central [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:39 PM
   Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
  
  
Hello All, This Elma stuff sounds like a metal casting
bi-product
from
 a
foundry. Is there a foundry in our around Elma?
Thanks, Tom
Peregrineflier 
The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
- Original Message -
From: mafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: meteor central [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
   
   
 fulguritic? given a sighting of a smoking trail and smoldering
 pieces
  of
 basaltic glass with sand inside, sounds like some
atmospheric
 event

 - Original Message -
 From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:22 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


  Hi Mike, Mike and List,
 
  The Elma material is definitely not a meteorite, so to
speak.
It
   could
  prove to be just as or more interesting to the scientific
 community.
The
  jury is still out on exactly what this material is or how it
was
created.
  The initial lab results created more questions than answers.
As
 has
   been
  reported this material consist of sand incased in a basaltic
glass
shell.
  The materials in the glass are not separated into swirls so
what
  ever
  created these objects had a huge amount of energy and the
glass
 was
 quenched
  very rapidly. Experiments are being conducted to see how
these
 might
have
  been created.  We should have more answers by next week.
This
is
looking
  more like an X-files episode than a meteor sighting.  For
now,
we
  are
  keeping an open mind regarding this material.
 
  All the best,
 
  Adam and Greg Hupe

Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-07 Thread Steve Schoner
Humm,

I wonder what fulgurites caused by lightning would
look like if such struck the area where these were
found.

Steve Schoner/ams

--- Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Mike, Mike and List,
 
 The Elma material is definitely not a meteorite, so
 to speak.  It could
 prove to be just as or more interesting to the
 scientific community.  The
 jury is still out on exactly what this material is
 or how it was created.
 The initial lab results created more questions than
 answers. As has been
 reported this material consist of sand incased in a
 basaltic glass shell.
 The materials in the glass are not separated into
 swirls so what ever
 created these objects had a huge amount of energy
 and the glass was quenched
 very rapidly. Experiments are being conducted to see
 how these might have
 been created.  We should have more answers by next
 week.  This is looking
 more like an X-files episode than a meteor sighting.
  For now, we are
 keeping an open mind regarding this material.
 
 All the best,
 
 Adam and Greg Hupe
 
 
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Meteorite
 List
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:35 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
  Mike, forget about this one, there is not a chance
 in hell that a
 meteorite
  was recovered there.
  Mike Farmer
  - Original Message -
  From: Mike Groetz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Meteorite List
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:35 PM
  Subject: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
   Everyone-
  Is this all said and done with or is the jury
 still
   out with any maybe's?
   Thanks,
   Mike
  
   __
   Do you Yahoo!?
   Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site
 design software
   http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
  
   __
   Meteorite-list mailing list
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  

http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
  
  
 
 
 
  __
  Meteorite-list mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list
 
 
 __
 Meteorite-list mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

__
Meteorite-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/meteorite-list


Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-07 Thread Tom aka James Knudson
Hello List, Mike wrote;
, I am simply offended by people wasting
scientific time with nonsense, especially now when it can take years to get
a simple classification.

I have to agree with mike here.  Adam and Greg said this was not a meteorite
in the beginning, and I think they would know! But, I for one, have been
chastised big time for posting OT things to the list. There was not a fall
in Elma and the things the people from Elma are claiming to meteorites are
not meteorites and in my opinion have no place on the list. I am interested
in the end result, but until then, I think we should save Art some bandwidth
on this subject.

Thanks, Tom
Peregrineflier 
The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
- Original Message -
From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 9:12 AM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


 Ok Adam, tell us all, where did you get your science degree? Oh I forgot,
 you have none, so please stop playing scientist.
 I don't have a closed mind, I am simply offended by people wasting
 scientific time with nonsense, especially now when it can take years to
get
 a simple classification.
 Mike Farmer
 - Original Message -
 From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 1:40 AM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


  Hey Mike and Dear List,
 
  Ex and current NASA scientist know the difference between tar and glass.
  Maybe you should have an open mind because you would be blown away by
the
  lab results if you truly understood mineralogy.  This is definitely not
 tar,
  only somebody with a closed mind and no understanding of chemistry would
  make such a statement, go back to school.
 
  Adam
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Charles R. Viau [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Adam Hupe'
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:14 PM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
   Well, It CANNOT be a tekite, tektites are made by large impacts
melting
  the
   impacted rock. these were found in a telephone pole! My god, every
  telephone
   pole I have ever seen is covered in tar or whatever weird melted black
  stuff
   they use, sort of like tar on house roofs, which I believe that the
 Hupes
   also found in the debris from my printer-smashing Park Forest. H
  tiny
   little melted tektites found on the floor under the smashed shingles
and
   tarred roof, more little melted glass like tektites found in and
round
 a
   telephone pole at the site of a stupid hoax that got way more
attention
  than
   it should have. I see a curious pattern forming here.  Maybe there
were
  some
   bugs smashed into the tar so we have little spidy creatures like
the
   Frass meteorite.
  Charles. I have never heard of you, but I assure you that I
know
  just
   a tad more than you might think, and I assure you that this is a waste
 of
   scientific time.
   It defies the most simple things that we know about meteorites, thus
  making
   it bogus.
  
   Mike Farmer
   - Original Message -
   From: Charles R. Viau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: 'Michael Farmer' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Adam Hupe'
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:35 PM
   Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
  
  
Given the reputation of the people examining this stuff, how busy
they
are, and the amount of time they are willing to spend on this - It's
 not
crap. It is probably more related to a tektite than anything else if
 one
were to summon up a simile , and how did pieces of this wind up
 embedded
in a telephone pole? - I think the Hupe brothers , as well as the
 PhD's
in those labs are doing their job because they believe there is
scientific merit in doing so, and no matter what the outcome, they
 need
to know what it is because it passed through the filters that would
 have
tossed 'crap' out 2 weeks ago. Perhaps, if you had some of this
stuff
you might feel different.
   
Charlyv
   
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
 Michael
Farmer
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:35 PM
To: Adam Hupe; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
   
Give me a break people, this is retarded. Yep, YE HAA PA saw that
 there
little glass chunks fall out of the sky and they burnded my hands
two
weeks
later!
Why waste time on this crap.
Mike Farmer
- Original Message -
From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
   
   
 Hi Tom,

 No glass manufacturing process would use this kind of sand because
 of
it
 impurities and why would glass be spread

Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-07 Thread Adam Hupe
Hey Mike and Dear List,

Ex and current NASA scientist know the difference between tar and glass.
Maybe you should have an open mind because you would be blown away by the
lab results if you truly understood mineralogy.  This is definitely not tar,
only somebody with a closed mind and no understanding of chemistry would
make such a statement, go back to school.

Adam

- Original Message -
From: Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Charles R. Viau [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Adam Hupe'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 8:14 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


 Well, It CANNOT be a tekite, tektites are made by large impacts melting
the
 impacted rock. these were found in a telephone pole! My god, every
telephone
 pole I have ever seen is covered in tar or whatever weird melted black
stuff
 they use, sort of like tar on house roofs, which I believe that the Hupes
 also found in the debris from my printer-smashing Park Forest. H
tiny
 little melted tektites found on the floor under the smashed shingles and
 tarred roof, more little melted glass like tektites found in and round a
 telephone pole at the site of a stupid hoax that got way more attention
than
 it should have. I see a curious pattern forming here.  Maybe there were
some
 bugs smashed into the tar so we have little spidy creatures like the
 Frass meteorite.
Charles. I have never heard of you, but I assure you that I know
just
 a tad more than you might think, and I assure you that this is a waste of
 scientific time.
 It defies the most simple things that we know about meteorites, thus
making
 it bogus.

 Mike Farmer
 - Original Message -
 From: Charles R. Viau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'Michael Farmer' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Adam Hupe'
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:35 PM
 Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


  Given the reputation of the people examining this stuff, how busy they
  are, and the amount of time they are willing to spend on this - It's not
  crap. It is probably more related to a tektite than anything else if one
  were to summon up a simile , and how did pieces of this wind up embedded
  in a telephone pole? - I think the Hupe brothers , as well as the PhD's
  in those labs are doing their job because they believe there is
  scientific merit in doing so, and no matter what the outcome, they need
  to know what it is because it passed through the filters that would have
  tossed 'crap' out 2 weeks ago. Perhaps, if you had some of this stuff
  you might feel different.
 
  Charlyv
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael
  Farmer
  Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:35 PM
  To: Adam Hupe; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
  Give me a break people, this is retarded. Yep, YE HAA PA saw that there
  little glass chunks fall out of the sky and they burnded my hands two
  weeks
  later!
  Why waste time on this crap.
  Mike Farmer
  - Original Message -
  From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:26 PM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
   Hi Tom,
  
   No glass manufacturing process would use this kind of sand because of
  it
   impurities and why would glass be spread into a shot-put pit where
  kids
   could get cut on the sharp edges?  I am not going to speculate too
  much
  more
   until we get more lab results.  Two other labs have weighed in on this
   occurrence and it just keeps getting odder.
  
   All the best,
  
   Adam
  
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Tom aka James Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED];
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:17 PM
   Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
  
  
Hello All, How about a glass manufacturing bi-product?
Thanks, Tom
Peregrineflier 
The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
- Original Message -
From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
   
   
 Hi Tom and List,

 The problem with this material is that it does not contain any
  metal.
   If
it
 was in a reducing environment why isn't there any metal, even at
microprobe
 levels?  This almost certainly eliminates this material coming
  from an
 industrial process, at least none that I have ever heard of.  If
  it
  came
 from a foundry why wasn't the sand melted in the center.  The sand
  is
   also
 trapped in sealed vesicles, that look almost like chondrules, like
  a
 condensation product, which is extremely odd.  It was extremely
   difficult
to
 make thin-sections of this stuff because of the friability of the
   material
 trapped inside.

 Will update as we get more results,

 Adam

Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-07 Thread Steve Schoner
From what I see regarding this subject, no one on this
list has said that it is a meteorite.

But they are scientifically inclined enough to
continue with the question.

What is it?

Tests, I assume are being done, and that question will
be resolved.

Steve Schoner/ams



--- Michael Farmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Well, It CANNOT be a tekite, tektites are made by
 large impacts melting the
 impacted rock. these were found in a telephone pole!
 My god, every telephone
 pole I have ever seen is covered in tar or whatever
 weird melted black stuff
 they use, sort of like tar on house roofs, which I
 believe that the Hupes
 also found in the debris from my printer-smashing
 Park Forest. H tiny
 little melted tektites found on the floor under the
 smashed shingles and
 tarred roof, more little melted glass like
 tektites found in and round a
 telephone pole at the site of a stupid hoax that got
 way more attention than
 it should have. I see a curious pattern forming
 here.  Maybe there were some
 bugs smashed into the tar so we have little
 spidy creatures like the
 Frass meteorite.
Charles. I have never heard of you, but I
 assure you that I know just
 a tad more than you might think, and I assure you
 that this is a waste of
 scientific time.
 It defies the most simple things that we know about
 meteorites, thus making
 it bogus.
 
 Mike Farmer
 - Original Message - 
 From: Charles R. Viau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: 'Michael Farmer' [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 'Adam Hupe'
 [EMAIL PROTECTED];
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:35 PM
 Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
  Given the reputation of the people examining this
 stuff, how busy they
  are, and the amount of time they are willing to
 spend on this - It's not
  crap. It is probably more related to a tektite
 than anything else if one
  were to summon up a simile , and how did pieces of
 this wind up embedded
  in a telephone pole? - I think the Hupe brothers ,
 as well as the PhD's
  in those labs are doing their job because they
 believe there is
  scientific merit in doing so, and no matter what
 the outcome, they need
  to know what it is because it passed through the
 filters that would have
  tossed 'crap' out 2 weeks ago. Perhaps, if you had
 some of this stuff
  you might feel different.
 
  Charlyv
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 On Behalf Of Michael
  Farmer
  Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:35 PM
  To: Adam Hupe; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
  Give me a break people, this is retarded. Yep, YE
 HAA PA saw that there
  little glass chunks fall out of the sky and they
 burnded my hands two
  weeks
  later!
  Why waste time on this crap.
  Mike Farmer
  - Original Message - 
  From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:26 PM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
   Hi Tom,
  
   No glass manufacturing process would use this
 kind of sand because of
  it
   impurities and why would glass be spread into a
 shot-put pit where
  kids
   could get cut on the sharp edges?  I am not
 going to speculate too
  much
  more
   until we get more lab results.  Two other labs
 have weighed in on this
   occurrence and it just keeps getting odder.
  
   All the best,
  
   Adam
  
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Tom aka James Knudson
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED];
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:17 PM
   Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
  
  
Hello All, How about a glass manufacturing
 bi-product?
Thanks, Tom
Peregrineflier 
The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
- Original Message -
From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
   
   
 Hi Tom and List,

 The problem with this material is that it
 does not contain any
  metal.
   If
it
 was in a reducing environment why isn't
 there any metal, even at
microprobe
 levels?  This almost certainly eliminates
 this material coming
  from an
 industrial process, at least none that I
 have ever heard of.  If
  it
  came
 from a foundry why wasn't the sand melted in
 the center.  The sand
  is
   also
 trapped in sealed vesicles, that look almost
 like chondrules, like
  a
 condensation product, which is extremely
 odd.  It was extremely
   difficult
to
 make thin-sections of this stuff because of
 the friability of the
   material
 trapped inside.

 Will update as we get more results,

 Adam


 - Original Message -
 From: Tom aka James Knudson
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: mafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Adam
 Hupe
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: meteor central
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:39 PM

Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-06 Thread Michael Farmer
Well, It CANNOT be a tekite, tektites are made by large impacts melting the
impacted rock. these were found in a telephone pole! My god, every telephone
pole I have ever seen is covered in tar or whatever weird melted black stuff
they use, sort of like tar on house roofs, which I believe that the Hupes
also found in the debris from my printer-smashing Park Forest. H tiny
little melted tektites found on the floor under the smashed shingles and
tarred roof, more little melted glass like tektites found in and round a
telephone pole at the site of a stupid hoax that got way more attention than
it should have. I see a curious pattern forming here.  Maybe there were some
bugs smashed into the tar so we have little spidy creatures like the
Frass meteorite.
   Charles. I have never heard of you, but I assure you that I know just
a tad more than you might think, and I assure you that this is a waste of
scientific time.
It defies the most simple things that we know about meteorites, thus making
it bogus.

Mike Farmer
- Original Message - 
From: Charles R. Viau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Michael Farmer' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Adam Hupe'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:35 PM
Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


 Given the reputation of the people examining this stuff, how busy they
 are, and the amount of time they are willing to spend on this - It's not
 crap. It is probably more related to a tektite than anything else if one
 were to summon up a simile , and how did pieces of this wind up embedded
 in a telephone pole? - I think the Hupe brothers , as well as the PhD's
 in those labs are doing their job because they believe there is
 scientific merit in doing so, and no matter what the outcome, they need
 to know what it is because it passed through the filters that would have
 tossed 'crap' out 2 weeks ago. Perhaps, if you had some of this stuff
 you might feel different.

 Charlyv

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael
 Farmer
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:35 PM
 To: Adam Hupe; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

 Give me a break people, this is retarded. Yep, YE HAA PA saw that there
 little glass chunks fall out of the sky and they burnded my hands two
 weeks
 later!
 Why waste time on this crap.
 Mike Farmer
 - Original Message - 
 From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:26 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


  Hi Tom,
 
  No glass manufacturing process would use this kind of sand because of
 it
  impurities and why would glass be spread into a shot-put pit where
 kids
  could get cut on the sharp edges?  I am not going to speculate too
 much
 more
  until we get more lab results.  Two other labs have weighed in on this
  occurrence and it just keeps getting odder.
 
  All the best,
 
  Adam
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Tom aka James Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED];
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:17 PM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
   Hello All, How about a glass manufacturing bi-product?
   Thanks, Tom
   Peregrineflier 
   The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
   - Original Message -
   From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:08 PM
   Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
  
  
Hi Tom and List,
   
The problem with this material is that it does not contain any
 metal.
  If
   it
was in a reducing environment why isn't there any metal, even at
   microprobe
levels?  This almost certainly eliminates this material coming
 from an
industrial process, at least none that I have ever heard of.  If
 it
 came
from a foundry why wasn't the sand melted in the center.  The sand
 is
  also
trapped in sealed vesicles, that look almost like chondrules, like
 a
condensation product, which is extremely odd.  It was extremely
  difficult
   to
make thin-sections of this stuff because of the friability of the
  material
trapped inside.
   
Will update as we get more results,
   
Adam
   
   
- Original Message -
From: Tom aka James Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Adam Hupe
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: meteor central [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
   
   
 Hello All, This Elma stuff sounds like a metal casting
 bi-product
 from
  a
 foundry. Is there a foundry in our around Elma?
 Thanks, Tom
 Peregrineflier 
 The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
 - Original Message -
 From: mafer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: meteor central [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 3:30 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite

RE: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

2003-08-06 Thread Charles R. Viau
Michael,

I have heard of you, in fact I have a number of meteorites in my
collection that came from you. Never even said it was a tektite, just
said it looked like one, more that it does a meteorite. Creosote is tar
- no way in the world does this stuff resemble tar or any other stuff
you have seen on a roof. Do you honestly think that scientists like this
would ever examine a piece of tar?  The people that are examining this
stuff are the same people responsible for authenticating what we own. I
give them the credit for the diligence in providing an answer to what it
is, as well as what it is not. The NOT part would be a done deal by now
if they did not think otherwise so give them a break and show them the
respect they deserve.

Charlyv IMCA 4351 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael
Farmer
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 11:15 PM
To: Charles R. Viau; 'Adam Hupe'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

Well, It CANNOT be a tekite, tektites are made by large impacts melting
the
impacted rock. these were found in a telephone pole! My god, every
telephone
pole I have ever seen is covered in tar or whatever weird melted black
stuff
they use, sort of like tar on house roofs, which I believe that the
Hupes
also found in the debris from my printer-smashing Park Forest. H
tiny
little melted tektites found on the floor under the smashed shingles and
tarred roof, more little melted glass like tektites found in and round
a
telephone pole at the site of a stupid hoax that got way more attention
than
it should have. I see a curious pattern forming here.  Maybe there were
some
bugs smashed into the tar so we have little spidy creatures like the
Frass meteorite.
   Charles. I have never heard of you, but I assure you that I know
just
a tad more than you might think, and I assure you that this is a waste
of
scientific time.
It defies the most simple things that we know about meteorites, thus
making
it bogus.

Mike Farmer
- Original Message - 
From: Charles R. Viau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Michael Farmer' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'Adam Hupe'
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:35 PM
Subject: RE: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


 Given the reputation of the people examining this stuff, how busy they
 are, and the amount of time they are willing to spend on this - It's
not
 crap. It is probably more related to a tektite than anything else if
one
 were to summon up a simile , and how did pieces of this wind up
embedded
 in a telephone pole? - I think the Hupe brothers , as well as the
PhD's
 in those labs are doing their job because they believe there is
 scientific merit in doing so, and no matter what the outcome, they
need
 to know what it is because it passed through the filters that would
have
 tossed 'crap' out 2 weeks ago. Perhaps, if you had some of this stuff
 you might feel different.

 Charlyv

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Michael
 Farmer
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 7:35 PM
 To: Adam Hupe; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?

 Give me a break people, this is retarded. Yep, YE HAA PA saw that
there
 little glass chunks fall out of the sky and they burnded my hands two
 weeks
 later!
 Why waste time on this crap.
 Mike Farmer
 - Original Message - 
 From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:26 PM
 Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?


  Hi Tom,
 
  No glass manufacturing process would use this kind of sand because
of
 it
  impurities and why would glass be spread into a shot-put pit where
 kids
  could get cut on the sharp edges?  I am not going to speculate too
 much
 more
  until we get more lab results.  Two other labs have weighed in on
this
  occurrence and it just keeps getting odder.
 
  All the best,
 
  Adam
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Tom aka James Knudson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED];
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:17 PM
  Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
 
 
   Hello All, How about a glass manufacturing bi-product?
   Thanks, Tom
   Peregrineflier 
   The proudest member of the IMCA 6168
   - Original Message -
   From: Adam Hupe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:08 PM
   Subject: Re: [meteorite-list] Elma Status?
  
  
Hi Tom and List,
   
The problem with this material is that it does not contain any
 metal.
  If
   it
was in a reducing environment why isn't there any metal, even at
   microprobe
levels?  This almost certainly eliminates this material coming
 from an
industrial process, at least none that I have ever heard of.  If
 it
 came
from a foundry why wasn't the sand melted in the center.  The
sand
 is
  also
trapped in sealed vesicles, that look