Johannes,
Adam's true colours were revealed a long time ago which is why everyone
ignores his rants here on the metlist. He likes the sound of his own voice
and stands on his soapbox and shouts into empty space. He is a hypocrit who
is under the illusion that what he thinks and says is somehow
Thank you the links to the online catalog. There was some amazing items
listed
I was intrigued by the value of the spheres they had listed, based on that,
I must have a world class collection ;)
__
Visit our Facebook page
I reported every single stone in the NWA 1110 Martian pairing which
amounted to several dozen. I cleaned each individual and made sure the
classifying scientist examined each and every one of them after a type
specimen was submitted. Then an image was taken of the entire lot and
submitted to
"Self-pairing is a slippery slope. Allowing laymen/dealers/Moroccans to
classify their own stones opens up the entire meteorite collectable sector to
fraud."
Hence my condition that the seller needs to be "reliable". A subjective term,
yes, but it is impossible to formally pair every stone.
Self-pairing is a slippery slope. Allowing laymen/dealers/Moroccans to
classify their own stones opens up the entire meteorite collectable
sector to fraud. One just needs to see the damage it created with
Martian meteorites a few years ago when collector confidence was at an
all-time low in
Thank you, Peter, for posting again (for a 2nd time) the link to the MBD entry
for the La'gad meteorite. It was a simple, but polite, way to point out that
all of the questions that have been asked about this meteorite have their
answers in that entry.
It shouldn't be necessary, but now that
Sorta feels like we are rehashing an old topic in a new form here...
It is common and even justifiable for people to be attached to the concept of
formal pairings and classification for specimens, particularly when they pride
themselves on selling specimens of a well known classification.
I meant to include the following information in my last message:
The other Lunar meteorite from Western Sahara in this auction is NWA 10986
(Lunar, highlands feldspathic impact-melt breccia).
And if you have any questions about this Lunar, the answers can be found here
in the Met Bull
How could it possibly be the main mass when it is claimed to be part of
the NWA 8455 "clan" which consists of 15 names under its many pairings?
The single NWA 8455 stone was reported to weigh 2,814 grams which would
make it the current "main mass" of this pairing group.
This also doesn't
Thank you, Peter, for posting again (for a 2nd time) the link to the MBD entry
for the La'gad meteorite.
It was a simple, but polite, way to point out that all of the questions that
have been asked about this meteorite have their answers in that entry.
It shouldn't be necessary, but now that
> Adam Hupe wrote via Meteorite-list :
>
> La'gad doesn't show up in the Meteoritical Bulletin. What institution or
> scientist examined this exact specimen or is it unofficial or self-paired?
https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php?code=63189
Cheers,
I looked through the catalog and was shocked to see unclassified and
unnamed stones being offered up as lunar and Martian meteorites! Wow,
the consignor must have saved a lot by completely bypassing the
classification process. Just throw out a worthless COA instead!
In the case of the
I think there may be something amiss here when several dozen stones were
offered under La'gad name when only three are listed with a TKW of only
338 grams. This leads to the question; who studied this exact stone?
Self-pairings are so prevalent these days that prospective buyers have
the
Just the sound of crickets, and of the flies buzzing over the bait
https://tinyurl.com/Any-ques ... tions?
David S. Pumpkins
On Thursday, November 02, 2017 03:34:49 PM, Adam Hupe via
Meteorite-list wrote:
La'gad
Interesting, I typed it into the Meteoritical Bulletin search site and
nothing shows up:
Here is the link I used:
https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meteor/metbull.php
In any case, how much of it is really out there? Only three stones
weighing a total of 338 grams is recorded.
Adam
On 11/2/2017
> Am 02.11.2017 um 23:34 schrieb Adam Hupe via Meteorite-list
> :
>
> La'gad doesn't show up in the Meteoritical Bulletin. What institution or
> scientist examined this exact specimen or is it unofficial or self-paired?
La'gad doesn't show up in the Meteoritical Bulletin. What institution or
scientist examined this exact specimen or is it unofficial or self-paired?
Adam
On 11/2/2017 3:07 PM, Robert Verish via Meteorite-list wrote:
I had the honor and the pleasure (while they were temporarily in my
I had the honor and the pleasure (while they were temporarily in my possession)
of personally examining up-close some of the meteorites in this auction that
are from Western Sahara. I am no longer in possession of any of the meteorites
in this auction. All of these specimens from Western
What’s your involvement in this auction Bob, just to be clear?
Luther
UK
> On 2 Nov 2017, at 00:07, Galactic Stone & Ironworks via Meteorite-list
> wrote:
>
> What's up with the rust blooms on that endcut of Sericho? You can
> clearly see them in the
What's up with the rust blooms on that endcut of Sericho? You can
clearly see them in the catalog photo. I don't imagine that Heritage
has anybody inspect these pieces before they promote them? It would be
a bit disappointing to buy a major auction house specimen and have it
disintegrate into a
There is a Eucrite in this auction that may look familiar, and I don't mean
because it looks like Bierschinken. It is NWA 7496 --
and here is where you have seen it before:
http://meteorites.wustl.edu/mugshots/nwa_7496_polymict_eucrite.htm
All photos by Randy L. Korotev
And it made an
21 matches
Mail list logo