Why not a version 3.2 with dj 1.7 and 1.8 support?
On Tuesday, March 24, 2015 at 9:52:17 AM UTC+6, Eduardo Rivas wrote:
Hi. I'm sharing my personal viewpoint (wait for Steve to give a official
statement):
- My appreciation is that catching up with Django 1.7 is taking a lot
because
Hi everyone,
I would like to gauge some support for this - does the community as a whole
think it would be worthwhile to have a one-click-to-run host that allows
Mezzanine support?
I've hacked on something similar previously that was designed to do the
same thing - hosted Mezzanine with no
Hi all,
Are there any hosted solutions for Mezzanine? I'm talking about something
oriented at people with zero web development skills - an equivalent to
something like Dreamhost for installing WordPress
http://www.dreamhost.com/wordpress-hosting/
Unlike most WordPress hosting, the solution I
Apologies for the delay, I'm currently on vacation overseas with my wife
and children over the next month.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:06 AM, elguavas elgua...@gmail.com wrote:
given that django 1.8 will be released soon, how are things going for a
new pip installable release of mezzanine that
Hi Luke
As far as I know, no such thing exists.
The Mezzanine 'friendly' places I have heard of are
1. Webfaction - https://www.webfaction.com/
2. Digital Ocean - https://www.digitalocean.com/
3. Python Anywhere - https://www.pythonanywhere.com/
However, 'getting your hands dirty' with things
