Tantek's right. This is exactly the reasoning behind xFolk. Its a
very simple extension of reltag to allow tagging of arbitrary links
in a page.
On Jul 20, 2006, at 14:18, Tantek Çelik wrote:
You could however potentially use hCard+xFolk to make this
distinction,
since xFolk allows for a
On 7/22/06 3:30 AM, "Ben Ward" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 22 Jul 2006, at 03:15, Tantek Çelik wrote:
>> should these all be in the FAQ?
>
> I think we should definitely have this covered on the Wiki; it seems
> in the same spirit as dispelling the /. misconceptions last week.
Agreed.
"Open Source Semantic Web Search Engine Software"
http://semantical.org
Seems like an distributor of Caboodle
(http://www.caboodlenetworks.com/) open source software.
It's all RDF though, but thought I'd pass it along in case it could be
pushed in the mF direction.
Chris
--
Chris Messina
Agen
Hi Ryan
Thanks for the response.
From my point of view (as a non-programmer looking to promote uf to
a wider audience) I would argue that if uf applications are flawed or if
processing time gives unexpectedresults, then even if the uf specs
themselves are great, there will be understandab
Hi Ciaran
Thanks for the reply.
Your correct - the output from
http://suda.co.uk/projects/X2V/get-vcard.php?uri=http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/webmaster-2006/sessions/kelly/
is a vcf file with two entries.
However when MS Outlook on my PC gets hold of this file it only se
On 22 Jul 2006, at 03:15, Tantek Çelik wrote:
should these all be in the FAQ?
I think we should definitely have this covered on the Wiki; it seems
in the same spirit as dispelling the /. misconceptions last week.
Definitely worth getting this documented definitively, 'cause it
seems to b
I'll try and summarize it in a different way: as far as I'm concerned,
part of the very appeal of microformats (and part of the reason for
the "micro" prefix) is simplicity.
- As a spec writer, you don't have to come up with wholly new XML or
XML+RDF dialects
- As an author, you don't have to lea
