On Oct 9, 2006, at 7:06 PM, Karl Dubost wrote:
Le 06-10-10 à 10:19, Lachlan Hunt a écrit :
Torrents are useful in this respect, because the hash checks are
done as part of the process without any effort from the user.
You just gave the answers where some metadata should stay hidden.
I
On Oct 10, 2006, at 6:47 PM, Chris Messina wrote:
The -dev list has been pretty dead since June
Well, that's not the fault of the list, but the moderators (myself
included).
We've had a policy of only allowing people who have implementations
(parsers and such) to join the list. We
King Chung Huang wrote:
Is currency unit intended to be one whole name or two names?
My intention is to have 2 class names, one for the currency (ex. U.S.
currency), and one for the unit within that currency (ex. Dollar, Cent).
unit is optional, b/c most currencies have a default unit
On Oct 11, 2006, at 12:51 PM, Ryan King wrote:
We've had a policy of only allowing people who have implementations
(parsers and such) to join the list. We haven't been good at
following up on people's requests to join the list. We currently
have more than 100 people in the queue and the
On Oct 11, 2006, at 1:18 PM, Guillaume Lebleu wrote:
My intention is to have 2 class names, one for the currency (ex.
U.S. currency), and one for the unit within that currency (ex.
Dollar, Cent). unit is optional, b/c most currencies have a
default unit (Dollar in the case of the U.S.
Scott Reynen wrote:
Specifically, I don't think it makes sense to have the first abbr
tag with no title, and the second abbr with no content. It looks
like you're trying to communicate three different pieces of
information when only two are really being published.
Thank you for the
On Oct 11, 2006, at 2:43 PM, Guillaume Lebleu wrote:
Can we just treat everything as the default unit
Not sure what you mean in the context of the 99c example. The
default unit for the US currency is the Dollar, not the Cent, but
in the context of the 99c context, we need to ensure that
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Guillaume Lebleu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Please find it at: http://microformats.org/wiki/currency-proposal
How does this relate to the proposal in:
http://microformats.org/wiki/currency-brainstorming#Straw_man_proposal
It doesn't even seem to link to the page on
Scott Reynen wrote:
What I'm suggesting is that everything be treated as dollars in USD
and everything be treated as Yen in JPY. Isn't that how most
applications and people deal with money anyway?
I think this will indeed work in most cases.
There are some examples on the Web that make use
Hello,
I thought that to expand feedback on the Currency proposal, a simple
poll would be nice, so here it is:
http://www.vizu.com/poll-vote.html?n=15067
Note: choices are randomly ordered.
Looking forward to your participation.
Guillaume
___
On Oct 11, 2006, at 11:44 AM, Scott Reynen wrote:
On Oct 11, 2006, at 12:51 PM, Ryan King wrote:
We've had a policy of only allowing people who have
implementations (parsers and such) to join the list. We haven't
been good at following up on people's requests to join the list.
We
On Oct 11, 2006, at 4:13 PM, Guillaume Lebleu wrote:
There are some examples on the Web that make use of cents, and my
design philosophy with this proposal was to make simple things
simple to microformat, and complex things possible to microformat,
without requiring publishers to change
Scott Reynen wrote:
So which of these tasks should we aim to make simple? I'd say the
latter, because it's far more common (well over 80%, I think).
I think we agree here. $99 is more common than 99c, so the former should
be simpler to microformat than the latter. Where it seems we differ in
This will be an excellent time to mention, for the purposes of FYI to
all, the Atom Threading extensions [1]. Someone else can jump in and
mention The Process.
Regards, etc...
David
[1] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4685.txt
On 10/11/06, Ashley Kyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear The List,
I'm
You might consider just looking at XOXO pure as a route too, and
extracting the comment portion of the XOXO Blog Format
http://blogxoxo.blogspot.com/2006/01/xoxo-blog-format.html (as is
often done and is shown on
http://microformats.org/wiki/comments-formats) and nesting that way.
Since XOXO
Scott Reynen wrote:
On Oct 11, 2006, at 2:43 PM, Guillaume Lebleu wrote:
Can we just treat everything as the default unit
Not sure what you mean in the context of the 99c example. The default
unit for the US currency is the Dollar, not the Cent, but in the
context of the 99c context, we
Hi, I have just finnished reading both proposals, and here are some of
my thoughts.
Regarding the Straw man proposal, the symbol class seems to be
unnecesary since the symbol in most price representations is just a
convention to define which currency we are speaking of. So there is no
actual
Guillaume Lebleu wrote:
Please find it at: http://microformats.org/wiki/currency-proposal
For tables of currency, I don't like the global definition method
suggested. Tables cells have the scope and headers attributes
available, so we should use them where possible.
See, for example, this
I've just realized that the markup in my examples is wrong.. since I'm
using title to define a value on the span element where I should be
using the abbr element. I'm sorry about that, I was thinking more
along the lines on how to parse the format than the actual mark up.
Emiliano Martínez Luque
My message with corrected markup. Please disregard the other one.
Regarding the Straw man proposal, the symbol class seems to be
unnecesary since the symbol in most price representations is just a
convention to define which currency we are speaking of. So there is no
actual need to explicitly
On Oct 11, 2006, at 6:33 PM, Guillaume Lebleu wrote:
Scott Reynen wrote:
So which of these tasks should we aim to make simple? I'd say the
latter, because it's far more common (well over 80%, I think).
I think we agree here. $99 is more common than 99c, so the former
should be simpler to
21 matches
Mail list logo
