Re: [uf-discuss] "table headers inclusion method" & "axis"

On Apr 9, 2007, at 12:39 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote: In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ryan King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes Thee are a couple of references, on the wiki, to the "table headers inclusion method" and "axis" in tables, not least: [...] Thank you for your answers, but... Is it part

Re: [uf-discuss] "table headers inclusion method" & "axis"

Hi Andy et al, On 10/04/2007, at 5:39 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote: In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ryan King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes Thee are a couple of references, on the wiki, to the "table headers inclusion method" and "axis" in tables, not least: Is it part of the spec for hCard, hCalen

Re: [uf-discuss] Geo deployed on Wikipedia.

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >>>I've just added >> >>>Geo to Wikipedia's GeoTemplate: >And now the place-articles on OpenStreetMap, for example: and had it added to Wikipedia-NL; for example::

Re: [uf-discuss] "table headers inclusion method" & "axis"

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ryan King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >> Thee are a couple of references, on the wiki, to the "table headers >> inclusion method" and "axis" in tables, not least: [...] Thank you for your answers, but... >> Is it part of the spec for hCard, hCalendar, or any other

Re: [uf-discuss] "table headers inclusion method" & "axis"

On Apr 9, 2007, at 6:40 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote: Thee are a couple of references, on the wiki, to the "table headers inclusion method" and "axis" in tables, not least: from a year ago, but I can't find any more

Re: [uf-discuss] hAtom - proposed move from draft to full spec

On 4/9/07, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I contend that hAtom satisfies the requirements at: and should be made a full specification. Any objections? Certainly not from me :-) It would be nice if there was a process for actua

[uf-discuss] "table headers inclusion method" & "axis"

Thee are a couple of references, on the wiki, to the "table headers inclusion method" and "axis" in tables, not least: from a year ago, but I can't find any more definitive documentation. Nor do I recall any recent

[uf-discuss] Geo - draft XMDP profile

I have created a draft Geo profile: by editing that for hCard. I included the wording: "It is not required where the hCard profile is used, being a sub-set of that." Please will someone check it and - if appropriate - remove

[uf-discuss] hAtom - proposed move from draft to full spec

I contend that hAtom satisfies the requirements at: and should be made a full specification. Any objections? -- Andy Mabbett * Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: * Free Our Data:

[uf-discuss] Poll: Proposed change to adr/ hCard for 'adr with no children'

Further to discussion at: it is proposed to amend the adr spec, and the corresponding part of the hCard spec, thus: Where the adr has content, but no valid sub-properties, parsers [MAY | SHOULD | MUS

[uf-discuss] Geo -proposed move from draft to full spec (was: Geo - why still draft)

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ciaran McNulty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >On 4/9/07, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Why is "geo" still a draft, when it's included in the already-published >> hCard spec? > >It's the idea of pulling the GEO out of hCard and making it usable on >its own

Re: [uf-discuss] Geo - why still draft

On 4/9/07, Andy Mabbett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Why is "geo" still a draft, when it's included in the already-published hCard spec? It's the idea of pulling the GEO out of hCard and making it usable on its own that is a draft specification, I believe. GEO and ADR as stand-alone microformats

[uf-discuss] Operator article in Wikipedia

There's now an article about Operator, in Wikipedia: -- Andy Mabbett ___ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microf

[uf-discuss] Geo - why still draft

Why is "geo" still a draft, when it's included in the already-published hCard spec? -- Andy Mabbett ___ microformats-discuss mailing list microformats-discuss@microformats.org http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss