Re: [uf-discuss] Firefox 3 (was: Icons of MF wiki)

2008-01-11 Thread Manu Sporny
Andy Mabbett wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael > Smethurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >> On 11/1/08 10:31, "Alex Faaborg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> do you have any plans to support rdf-a in the interface? In 4.0, 5.0, 6.0? >>> >>> We haven't decided yet, and I would

Re: [uf-discuss] Firefox 3 (was: Icons of MF wiki)

2008-01-11 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Smethurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes On 11/1/08 10:31, "Alex Faaborg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: do you have any plans to support rdf-a in the interface? In 4.0, 5.0, 6.0? We haven't decided yet, and I would love to hear people's opinions both in favo

Re: [uf-discuss] hAudio rel-enclosure & linking issues

2008-01-11 Thread Martin McEvoy
Hello Andy > It would also seem to be inadvisable to use rel="enclosure" for links to > off-site files. Please can you explain a little further why you have an issue with this? It seems sound enough to me :) I have found more often than not that a purchased audio track is rarely downloaded from

Re: [uf-discuss] hAudio issue: position

2008-01-11 Thread Martin McEvoy
Hello Andy I have cross posted this email to microformats new as I believe hAudio is still in development and any Issues anyone may have with haudio should really be posted there. On Thu, 2008-01-10 at 23:35 +, Andy Mabbett wrote: > The recommended use of "position" in hAudio: > >

Re: [uf-discuss] Firefox 3 (was: Icons of MF wiki)

2008-01-11 Thread Manu Sporny
Michael Smethurst wrote: > On 11/1/08 10:31, "Alex Faaborg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> do you have any plans to support rdf-a in the >>> interface? In 4.0, 5.0, 6.0? >> We haven't decided yet, and I would love to hear people's opinions >> both in favor of and against including RDFa support i

Re: [uf-discuss] Firefox 3 (was: Icons of MF wiki)

2008-01-11 Thread Michael Smethurst
On 11/1/08 10:31, "Alex Faaborg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> do you have any plans to support rdf-a in the >> interface? In 4.0, 5.0, 6.0? > > We haven't decided yet, and I would love to hear people's opinions > both in favor of and against including RDFa support in a future > release of Fir

Re: [uf-discuss] Firefox 3 (was: Icons of MF wiki)

2008-01-11 Thread Alex Faaborg
do you have any plans to support rdf-a in the interface? In 4.0, 5.0, 6.0? We haven't decided yet, and I would love to hear people's opinions both in favor of and against including RDFa support in a future release of Firefox. -Alex On Jan 11, 2008, at 2:02 AM, Michael Smethurst wrote:

Re: [uf-discuss] Firefox 3 (was: Icons of MF wiki)

2008-01-11 Thread Michael Smethurst
On 10/1/08 18:03, "Alex Faaborg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> By "next release", do you mean 3.0.1 (or some such) or 4.0? > > The next major release (point releases are primarily used for security > updates). In general we try to do a release every 12 months, but > since 3 has turned into a