Re: [uf-discuss] Firefox 3 (was: Icons of MF wiki)

2008-01-11 Thread Manu Sporny
Andy Mabbett wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael > Smethurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >> On 11/1/08 10:31, "Alex Faaborg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> do you have any plans to support rdf-a in the interface? In 4.0, 5.0, 6.0? >>> >>> We haven't decided yet, and I would

Re: [uf-discuss] Firefox 3 (was: Icons of MF wiki)

2008-01-11 Thread Andy Mabbett
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Smethurst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes On 11/1/08 10:31, "Alex Faaborg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: do you have any plans to support rdf-a in the interface? In 4.0, 5.0, 6.0? We haven't decided yet, and I would love to hear people's opinions both in favo

Re: [uf-discuss] Firefox 3 (was: Icons of MF wiki)

2008-01-11 Thread Manu Sporny
Michael Smethurst wrote: > On 11/1/08 10:31, "Alex Faaborg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> do you have any plans to support rdf-a in the >>> interface? In 4.0, 5.0, 6.0? >> We haven't decided yet, and I would love to hear people's opinions >> both in favor of and against including RDFa support i

Re: [uf-discuss] Firefox 3 (was: Icons of MF wiki)

2008-01-11 Thread Michael Smethurst
On 11/1/08 10:31, "Alex Faaborg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> do you have any plans to support rdf-a in the >> interface? In 4.0, 5.0, 6.0? > > We haven't decided yet, and I would love to hear people's opinions > both in favor of and against including RDFa support in a future > release of Fir

Re: [uf-discuss] Firefox 3 (was: Icons of MF wiki)

2008-01-11 Thread Alex Faaborg
do you have any plans to support rdf-a in the interface? In 4.0, 5.0, 6.0? We haven't decided yet, and I would love to hear people's opinions both in favor of and against including RDFa support in a future release of Firefox. -Alex On Jan 11, 2008, at 2:02 AM, Michael Smethurst wrote:

Re: [uf-discuss] Firefox 3 (was: Icons of MF wiki)

2008-01-11 Thread Michael Smethurst
On 10/1/08 18:03, "Alex Faaborg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> By "next release", do you mean 3.0.1 (or some such) or 4.0? > > The next major release (point releases are primarily used for security > updates). In general we try to do a release every 12 months, but > since 3 has turned into a

Re: [uf-discuss] Firefox 3 (was: Icons of MF wiki)

2008-01-10 Thread André Luís
I agree that it's a bit disappointing not to have microformats exposed in the UI... I guess it's more important to have a robust and easy to extend API than a fancy UI. I just wish we could have both. :( No worries. Great work, nonetheless. Also, I apologize for my possible ignorance, but will th

Re: [uf-discuss] Firefox 3 (was: Icons of MF wiki)

2008-01-10 Thread Alex Faaborg
By "next release", do you mean 3.0.1 (or some such) or 4.0? The next major release (point releases are primarily used for security updates). In general we try to do a release every 12 months, but since 3 has turned into a longer cycle (starting to look like 16-17 months) and focused on a

[uf-discuss] Firefox 3 (was: Icons of MF wiki)

2008-01-10 Thread Andy Mabbett
On Thu, January 10, 2008 16:48, Alex Faaborg wrote: > In order to maintain the current ship schedule for Firefox 3, > we won't be exposing microformatted content in the user interface. Much as I'm keen to have FF3, that's a shame. > we will only need to worry about finishing front end changes f