Scott Reynen wrote:
I think comparing RDFa to microformats actually hurts your argument by
suggesting they solve the same problem and reinforcing the notion that
the wider problem RDFa seeks to solve is unimportant. Rather, I would
interpret the mentions of microformats as an indication that
Manu,
the css based approach is somethin that has come up in discussions
about semantics with fellow workers. I believe it does not trash all
of the hard work the communities have don so far. All it does, from
what i gathered, is move the semantics from html and places it in a
separate file/place.
André Luís wrote:
Manu,
the css based approach is somethin that has come up in discussions
about semantics with fellow workers. I believe it does not trash all
of the hard work the communities have don so far.
I never said the discussions trashed all of our hard work. I said that
some of the
I had misread you there, Manu. I apologize.
Thanks for clearing it up.
Those 3x bullet points are a great summary. Well done.
--
André
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Manu Sporny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
André Luís wrote:
Manu,
the css based approach is somethin that has come up in
On [Aug 25], at [ Aug 25] 8:47 , Manu Sporny wrote:
There have been several threads discussing Microformats, RDFa and
HTML5
that are occurring on the WHATWG mailing list. The discussion
relates to
whether or not HTML5 should depend on the Microformats community to
solve HTML5's semantic
On 25 Aug 2008, at 19:47, Manu Sporny wrote:
There have been several threads discussing Microformats, RDFa and
HTML5
that are occurring on the WHATWG mailing list. The discussion
relates to
whether or not HTML5 should depend on the Microformats community to
solve HTML5's semantic markup
There have been several threads discussing Microformats, RDFa and HTML5
that are occurring on the WHATWG mailing list. The discussion relates to
whether or not HTML5 should depend on the Microformats community to
solve HTML5's semantic markup issues, or if both Microformats and RDFa
should be
