Andy Mabbett wrote:
While I'm aware that we're discussing possible changes to vcard,
rather than ways of using the current hCard, I think this is a case
where looking at what people actually publish (and allow for in forms)
on the web; and what address-book apps allow for, would be useful
Philip Tellis wrote:
Would you, for example, put down, preferred from 0900-1700IST, except
on weekends and between the 5th and 15th of May, unless you're signed
up with plan foo on provider bar as meta info for the number?
Here is a real-life example of a similar case (opening hours bound to
On Tue, January 8, 2008 09:29, Michael Smethurst wrote:
I'm looking into marking up contact details for tv and radio programmes
Typically they have a telephone number, an email address, possibly a fax
number and often a sms short code
Is there a preferred way to mark-up the sms short
Hello!
I'm looking into marking up contact details for tv and radio programmes
Typically they have a telephone number, an email address, possibly a fax
number and often a sms short code
Is there a preferred way to mark-up the sms short code?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/
This e-mail (and any
On Tue, January 8, 2008 09:29, Michael Smethurst wrote:
I'm looking into marking up contact details for tv and radio programmes
Typically they have a telephone number, an email address, possibly a fax
number and often a sms short code
Is there a preferred way to mark-up the sms short code?
Andy Mabbett wrote:
I've added the issue here:
http://microformats.org/wiki/vcard-suggestions#3.3.1_TEL_Type_Definition
and will raise it with the group being formed to look at revising vCard.
Hi,
it might be a good idea to look at the proposed registry for tel: URI
parameters
On Tue, January 8, 2008 11:08, Alex Mayrhofer wrote:
Andy Mabbett wrote:
I've added the issue here:
http://microformats.org/wiki/vcard-suggestions#3.3.1_TEL_Type_Definiti
on
it might be a good idea to look at the proposed registry for tel: URI
parameters
On 08/01/2008, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good point. The nearest at the moment is type=cell, but since such
numbers usually cannot be dialled for voice calls, that's not really
I don't understand this. Why can't type=cell be dialled for voice calls?
On 8 Jan 2008, at 19:13, Philip Tellis wrote:
On 08/01/2008, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good point. The nearest at the moment is type=cell, but since such
numbers usually cannot be dialled for voice calls, that's not really
I don't understand this. Why can't type=cell be dialled
On 08/01/2008, Jim O'Donnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand this. Why can't type=cell be dialled for voice
calls?
I think the problem is that they can, but SMS short numbers can't.
so should there be a way to distinguish voice enabled numbers from SMS
only numbers and data
Philip Tellis wrote:
On 08/01/2008, Jim O'Donnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand this. Why can't type=cell be dialled for voice
calls?
I think the problem is that they can, but SMS short numbers can't.
so should there be a way to distinguish voice enabled
On 08/01/2008, Guillaume Lebleu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding a TEL TYPE value 'sms' seems to be a viable possible option. It
is just another service available @ the phone number, just like voice,
fax, etc.
so what we're looking at, is really two axes... one is the service
running at the
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Philip
Tellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On 08/01/2008, Guillaume Lebleu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding a TEL TYPE value 'sms' seems to be a viable possible option. It
is just another service available @ the phone number, just like voice,
fax, etc.
so what we're
On 08/01/2008, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps, but I'd slice it three ways and add more:
service:
voice, sms, fax, data, textphone, freephone
connection:
landline, mobile
I'm not sure I'd bother distinguishing between landline and mobile,
for the
I'm not sure I'd bother distinguishing between landline and mobile,
for the same reasons that you mentioned. It's largely irrelevant. My
choice of work, home, mobile was more an indication of where I'm
likely to be if you reach me on one of these numbers, ie, if you know
I'm at home, you're
On 08/01/2008, Michael MD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It might be of interest to people in some places - especially when there may
be differences between the costs of making a call to a landline or a mobile.
eg .. here in Sydney if I'm calling a local landline number from another
landline it is
Would you, for example, put down, preferred from 0900-1700IST, except
on weekends and between the 5th and 15th of May, unless you're signed
up with plan foo on provider bar as meta info for the number?
No,
but people might sometimes like to know if its a mobile or a landline (and
perhaps
In message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Philip
Tellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On 08/01/2008, Andy Mabbett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps, but I'd slice it three ways and add more:
service:
voice, sms, fax, data, textphone, freephone
connection:
landline, mobile
I'm not
18 matches
Mail list logo
