Re: [uf-discuss] Re: Sanity check on hCard usage

2006-05-24 Thread John Panzer
OK, so this span class=fnChattingChuck/span would produce a blank N, but the implied nickname rule would kick in to produce nickname:ChattingChuck? If so, then the remaining question is: Is this useful enough to mark up as an hcard? There's not much you can do with the nickname without

Re: [uf-discuss] Re: Sanity check on hCard usage

2006-05-24 Thread Chris Casciano
On May 24, 2006, at 12:35 PM, Scott Reynen wrote: On May 24, 2006, at 11:11 AM, John Panzer wrote: Is this useful enough to mark up as an hcard? There's not much you can do with the nickname without more context except display it. When I get an email or IM from someone I've previously

Re: [uf-discuss] Re: Sanity check on hCard usage

2006-05-24 Thread Tantek Çelik
John, You can make it even more useful since *you* know that the nickname is an *AIM screen name*. Hint: http://microformats.org/wiki/hcard-examples#AOL_Instant_Messenger_.28AIM.29 Tantek On 5/24/06 9:11 AM, John Panzer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, so this span

[uf-discuss] Re: Sanity check on hCard usage

2006-05-23 Thread Chris Messina
I think in order to validate, you need to supply at least the 'n' value, even if the screenname is not the actual name: li class=vcardspan class=n nicknameChattingChuck/span/li On the other hand, I don't know if you *should* mark up those fragments as hcards given the 'n' requirement... I think