On 28 Jun 2008, at 17:03, Ed Lucas wrote:
George Brocklehurst wrote:
Is it worth revisiting Tantek's original suggestion of using the
object element to represent dates? [1]
The idea was to do something like this:
object data=20050125January 25/object
This particular example is
On [Jun 28], at [ Jun 28] 11:09 , Ben Ward wrote:
On 28 Jun 2008, at 17:03, Ed Lucas wrote:
George Brocklehurst wrote:
Is it worth revisiting Tantek's original suggestion of using the
object element to represent dates? [1]
The idea was to do something like this:
object
On 28 Jun 2008, at 18:09, Ben Ward wrote:
I've pastied my test case, and would be grateful if people could
test the behaviour in Internet Explorer: http://pastie.org/224023
IE 6, 7 and the beta version of IE 8 all visibly render the object
element as a small box, similar to the way they
Ben Ward wrote:
On 28 Jun 2008, at 17:03, Ed Lucas wrote:
object data=20050125January 25/object
This particular example is invalid, as the data= attribute must
contain a URI, and a URI cannot start with a number.
It's perfectly valid. Absolute URIs can't start with a number, but
