I don't want to get anyone's hopes up but there's an interesting
comment from Lawrence Meckan on the WaSP blog post:
http://www.webstandards.org/2007/04/27/haccessibility/#comment-57838
He's getting good results from up-to-date screen readers with advance
verbosity settings and this little
I've been following this thread with some interest, and I have a
question: what is the ideal amount of human interface with machine-
readable content (when different from human-readable content) in
microformats? In visual browsers, the current common interface is a
minimal readability of
Lawrence wrote:
I should have more results uploaded late Wednesday AEST (I forgot to
record the audio outputs in the initial test for this behaviour),
which
should mean they should go live around midday in Brighton.
Excellent! I really appreciate you doing this.
I see three possible
Hi Andy,
On Apr 28, 2007, at 12:57 PM, Andy Mabbett wrote:
I can't prevent people from calling cats dogs either, but I'm
certainly going to say something when it happens.
This isn't case of people calling cats dogs; it's closer to the
dispute over whether a Jack Russell Terrier is a breed
Perhaps I'm getting into this a bit late and this has already been
brought up, but I've skimmed through the conversation and haven't
seen it. Tantek's original proposal[1] was scrapped because it didn't
work in Safari 1.2.1 (WebKit v125). Hasn't that particular browser
version been
I know this is partially addressed in the first hReview FAQ on the
microformats wiki, but I have a more general question. I have been
reading a lot about microformats, and have used hCard, but am fairly
new to them overall.
The possible values of 'type' are limited to: product | business |
event
Jeremy Keith wrote:
I don't want to get anyone's hopes up but there's an interesting comment
from Lawrence Meckan on the WaSP blog post:
http://www.webstandards.org/2007/04/27/haccessibility/#comment-57838
He's getting good results from up-to-date screen readers with advance
verbosity
I think this is a great question Nora. We're building a review
publisher/aggregator built on hReview and we ended up dropping type
from our reviews as it was confusing our beta testers and not really
adding any value to our site.
What is a movie? Most testers did not consider it a product,
On 4/27/07, Charles Iliya Krempeaux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Mike,
Is this going to be replacing XUL, XBL, etc etc?
Actually, we're looking more for discussion just around how you would
interact with microformats in the browser.
For instance, do people like the Siderbar interface for
Patrick H. Lauke wrote:
Jeremy Keith wrote:
snip
If there's a chance that adding an extra span inside the abbr element somehow
helps screen readers, then that should probably be included in the test cases:
http://microformats.org/wiki/assistive-technology-abbr-results
Like I said, we
The main problem, as I understood it, is that object[data] expects
a URI, even if it doesn't know how to handle it, so the first
suggestion is actually requesting the relative path ./20050125
which causes extra junk 404s (Ex. 1; not necessarily a bug). Some UAs
even requested relative
Jon Gibbins wrote:
We can use rel on links, but could rel be used to permit something
like this on a span:
span class=dtstart rel=datetime:MMDDTHHMMSSZ+HHMMDD
Month/span
Hi John, I'm glad you mentioned this. It's been discussed before and
shot down given the reference, namespaces
On Apr 30, 2007, at 8:20 PM, James Craig wrote:
We can use rel on links, but could rel be used to permit something
like this on a span:
span class=dtstart rel=datetime:MMDDTHHMMSSZ+HHMMDD
Month/span
Hi John, I'm glad you mentioned this. It's been discussed before
and shot down given
Le 1 mai 2007 à 09:53, James Craig a écrit :
The main problem, as I understood it, is that object[data]
expects a URI, even if it doesn't know how to handle it, so the
first suggestion is actually requesting the relative path ./
20050125 which causes extra junk 404s (Ex. 1; not necessarily
Friday, April 27, 2007 9:23 AM, Manu Sporny wrote:
Brian Suda wrote:
--- if you can give-us any other information, who exactly
the company
is, etc and any other information from the legal team we
can attempt
to work around these problems or debunk the FUD.
[snip]
For those of you
15 matches
Mail list logo
