On 26 Nov 2007, at 16:02, Brian Suda wrote:
2007/11/26, Ben Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
This is about making clear that microformats are an HTML technology,
not an exclusively XHTML technology. 'HTML' implies compatibility
with XHTML, 'XHTML' does not imply compatibility with HTML.
--- i'm not
On 26 Nov 2007, at 15:55, Ciaran McNulty wrote:
Is (X)HTML too unwieldy to
be the global replacement?
I feel that ‘(X)HTML’ or ‘X/HTML’ in every instance would read
clumsily and uglify the text. It would be irritating to read an
entire document where every instance of a familiar and legib
