[uf-discuss] RDFa Basics video (8 minutes)

2008-01-07 Thread Manu Sporny
Finished an RDFa Basics video this weekend. It attempts to explain RDF, CURIEs, N3 and basic RDFa in 8 minutes: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldl0m-5zLz4 Thought some of you would want to learn about some of the upcoming features of XHTML2 as well as compare and contrast how RDFa differs from

Re: [uf-discuss] RDFa Basics video (8 minutes)

2008-01-07 Thread Guillaume Lebleu
Manu Sporny wrote: Constructive feedback would be great, as I'll probably be doing the advanced RDFa tutorial in a month or so, and will need to know what worked and what didn't in the RDFa Basics video. I'm relatively new to RDFa and this is a great introduction. I'm probably going to say

Re: [uf-discuss] RDFa Basics video (8 minutes)

2008-01-07 Thread Scott Reynen
On Jan 7, 2008, at 1:31 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: @class wasn't used because they didn't want to stomp on the Microformats community's implementation, among other reasons. In certain RDFa implementations, bad things happened when you mixed RDFa and Microformats on the same page. Can you maybe

RE: [uf-discuss] RDFa vs microformats

2006-11-30 Thread Mike Schinkel
-discuss] RDFa vs microformats In case you missied my adding it to the 'wiki;', here's an article about RDFa vs microformats : http://evan.prodromou.name/RDFa_vs_microformats -- Andy Mabbett Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards: http://www.no2id.net/ Free Our

[uf-discuss] RDFa vs microformats

2006-11-25 Thread Andy Mabbett
In case you missied my adding it to the 'wiki;', here's an article about RDFa vs microformats : http://evan.prodromou.name/RDFa_vs_microformats -- Andy Mabbett Say NO! to compulsory ID Cards: http://www.no2id.net/ Free Our Data:

Re: [uf-discuss] RDFa and microformats

2006-06-01 Thread Ryan King
On May 30, 2006, at 7:54 PM, Joshua Kinberg wrote: That example of RDFa doesn't look like valid XHTML. Since when have XHTML elements included about, role, and property attributes? http://www.w3schools.com/tags/ref_standardattributes.asp Its XHTML 2, that's why. -ryan

Re: [uf-discuss] RDFa and microformats

2006-05-31 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
On 5/30/06, Scott Reynen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 30, 2006, at 1:25 PM, Elias Torres wrote: We could gain more if we gave it a shot at working together by leveraging the unbelievable momentum uFs have and the more general goals of RDFa even though in the end we might end up with *A*

[uf-discuss] RDFa and microformats

2006-05-30 Thread Evan Prodromou
Hi, all. My name is Evan Prodromou, and I'm a web developer. I founded Wikitravel (http://wikitravel.org/ ) and I'm also a developer on MediaWiki (http://www.mediawiki.org/ ), the software that runs Wikipedia. I'm very interested in embedding semantic data into XHTML pages, and implementing

Re: [uf-discuss] RDFa and microformats

2006-05-30 Thread Ben Ward
Hi Evan, RDFa was discussed a week or so ago on this list, and dismissed as off-topic for this list for a number of very clear reason. You can find the discussion in the uf-discuss archives here: http:// microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2006-May/004142.html The posts you

Re: [uf-discuss] RDFa and microformats

2006-05-30 Thread Evan Prodromou
I think that my question was misunderstood; I'm discussing a social and organizational issue rather than a technical one. It's an issue that very much matters to the future of microformats. Let me restate. A W3C effort to embed RDF in HTML is not a matter of if but a matter of when. Once such a

Re: [uf-discuss] RDFa and microformats

2006-05-30 Thread Scott Reynen
On May 30, 2006, at 3:53 PM, Elias Torres wrote: I'm missing your point Scott. If what you refer to as real-world implementation is (vcard, vcalendar, etc), then RDFa draws from them just as well uF does. I wasn't comparing microformats and RDFa. I was comparing RDFa and vcard. There were

Re: [uf-discuss] RDFa and microformats

2006-05-30 Thread Joshua Kinberg
That example of RDFa doesn't look like valid XHTML. Since when have XHTML elements included about, role, and property attributes? http://www.w3schools.com/tags/ref_standardattributes.asp -Josh On 5/30/06, Elias Torres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Scott Reynen wrote: On May 30, 2006, at 6:08

Re: [uf-discuss] RDFa and microformats

2006-05-30 Thread Elias Torres
Joshua Kinberg wrote: That example of RDFa doesn't look like valid XHTML. Since when have XHTML elements included about, role, and property attributes? http://www.w3schools.com/tags/ref_standardattributes.asp -Josh Josh, You are correct, not only that example but many others too. This

Re: RDFA - ugly, unnecessary and offtopic (was Re: [uf-discuss] RDFa)

2006-05-21 Thread Bruce D'Arcus
On 5/19/06, Tantek Çelik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * The use of QNames is *NOT* a use of standard XML namespaces, not by a long shot. QNames don't work with CSS Selectors, thus being impractical for presentation, thus failing to satisfy the primary use of semantic markup. I wonder about that

[uf-discuss] RDFa

2006-05-19 Thread Ben Ward
A W3C Working Draft published on May 16th: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-xhtml-rdfa-primer-20060516/ For Embedding RDF in XHTML. Gives iCal and vCard examples. In practice, there's a bit mark-up involved than with µF (namespace declarations for a start) but seems to acheive much the same