Re: [uf-new] hAudio/table incompatibility

2007-10-06 Thread Martin McEvoy
On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 11:49 +0100, Martin McEvoy wrote: On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 16:08 -0400, Manu Sporny wrote: Martin McEvoy wrote: On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 09:44 +0100, Julian Stahnke wrote: So this simpler proposal makes perfect sense to me. at least someone on the list Is starting

Re: [uf-new] hAudio/table incompatibility

2007-10-06 Thread Scott Reynen
So this simpler proposal makes perfect sense to me. at least someone on the list Is starting to make sense. Oh And thanks for Quoting me out of context.. Let's all try to clearly state what we mean without sarcasm and avoiding assumptions about what others mean, in the interest of

Re: [uf-new] hAudio/table incompatibility

2007-10-06 Thread Julian Stahnke
I'm guessing that you don't like the fact that you must define both TRACK and HAUDIO? The reason that we're doing this is because we might want to re-use TRACK (or whatever we end up calling it) in hVideo. Content has sections: Albums have Tracks Television Series have Episodes DVDs have

Re: [uf-new] hAudio/table incompatibility

2007-10-06 Thread Scott Reynen
On Oct 6, 2007, at 12:24 PM, Julian Stahnke wrote: What does ‘track’ mean in the context of the hVideo format, though? I think we're getting distracted here. That's a good question for the hVideo discussion, but it's really irrelevant to the hAudio discussion. Audio tracks need to be

Re: [uf-new] hAudio/table incompatibility

2007-10-06 Thread Julian Stahnke
On 6 Oct 2007, at 8:02pm, Scott Reynen wrote: On Oct 6, 2007, at 12:24 PM, Julian Stahnke wrote: What does ‘track’ mean in the context of the hVideo format, though? I think we're getting distracted here. That's a good question for the hVideo discussion, but it's really irrelevant to the

Re: [uf-new] hAudio/table incompatibility

2007-10-06 Thread Manu Sporny
Julian Stahnke wrote: If you want to push your proposal above, you will have to make the following arguments: 1. Why Ambiguity is not an issue for TRACK. 2. Why we should introduce a new property called TRACK-TITLE. 3. Why we should require CONTRIBUTOR to be marked up via a VCARD. About

Re: [uf-new] hAudio/table incompatibility

2007-10-06 Thread Scott Reynen
On Oct 6, 2007, at 4:54 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: PODCAST is disputed by Martin and since I'm the only person that is backing it based on the examples, it will probably be dropped unless somebody else wants to see the ability to mark up PODCASTs via hAudio. That's assuming those who don't want a

Re: [uf-new] hAudio/table incompatibility

2007-10-06 Thread Julian Stahnke
div class=haudio h3 class=albummy album title/h3 by strong class=contributorthe artist/strong ol li class=trackmy track title/li li class=trackmy track title/li li class=trackmy track title/li /ol /div div class=haudio h3 class=album3 live bands at my

Re: [uf-new] I propose a new microformat for poems.

2007-10-06 Thread paul_wilkins
From: Michael Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] div class=poem p class=verse Standing by the roadside,br / A tall dark man,br / Wore a long brown coat,br / Stood in the rain. /p I've never been keen with using breaks. A more semantically correct answer is provided with

[uf-new] hAudio position and description properties

2007-10-06 Thread Manu Sporny
Most of the day today was spent re-analyzing all of the music service and podcast websites in audio-info-examples using Microformalyze. The raw analysis data is available here: http://microformats.org/wiki/audio-info-examples#Microformalyze_Data_Files The analysis is available here:

Re: [uf-new] hAudio position and description properties

2007-10-06 Thread Julian Stahnke
PROPOSAL: We add POSITION and DESCRIPTION to the hAudio draft since there are enough examples to warrant their inclusion into the Microformat. I think you’re right and they both make perfect sense. ___ microformats-new mailing list