On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 09:44 -0600, Mike Delp wrote:
> The primary reason was the Geode Processor used in the RB230 is not ROHS
> compliant, so production had to be switched to other processors.
I do know that the processor used had the supply dry up after it was
discontinued. I spoke to John Tull
Bah, 8-track sucked as the tapes aged you would get horrible bleed from
the other tracks... :)
I do concur that the 230 while expensive as time went on, was a very
solid piece of equipment. In fact it still runs a large part of my
network and I don't think I have had one fail in over 2 years.
I'm on that boat with you... Was miles easier changing cards that were
designed to be hot swappable and that had human sized connectors...
Death to the inventor of the u.fl! May he join Bill G in wherever...
Robert
Butch Evans wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 08:02 -0800, Robert Andrews w
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 08:02 -0800, Robert Andrews wrote:
> Just my 2 cents... PCMCIA radio cards are much less in demand for the
> PC world than mini-pci... We, as consumers, needed to follow the
> trend. Even though we mostly use radios that are made specifically for
> the WISP environmen
The primary reason was the Geode Processor used in the RB230 is not ROHS
compliant, so production had to be switched to other processors.
Thanks
Mike
-Original Message-
From: mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com
[mailto:mikrotik-boun...@mail.butchevans.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent
Just my 2 cents... PCMCIA radio cards are much less in demand for the
PC world than mini-pci... We, as consumers, needed to follow the
trend. Even though we mostly use radios that are made specifically for
the WISP environment, they are dependant on parts that are made for the
mini-pci bo
ispa.org/ * WISPA Board Member *
> * http://blog.butchevans.com/ * Wired or Wireless Networks *
>
>
>
> ___
> Mikrotik mailing list
> Mikrotik@
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 09:30 -0500, Josh Luthman wrote:
> Is there a reason why they were disconntinued since they were so
> great? I didn't get into Mikrotik early enough to get to use these.
Hmm. I'm not sure how to address this without sounding like I'm on the
attack.
The RB230 (200 series
Speed and form factor, probably.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: "Josh Luthman"
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 8:30 AM
To: "Mikrotik discussions"
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] OT: Uptime
Is there a
Is there a reason why they were disconntinued since they were so
great? I didn't get into Mikrotik early enough to get to use these.
On 3/3/09, Butch Evans wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 01:19 -0600, Sam Tetherow wrote:
>> uptime: 487d23h39m56s
>> free-memor
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 01:19 -0600, Sam Tetherow wrote:
> uptime: 487d23h39m56s
> free-memory: 36168 kB
>total-memory: 62696 kB
> model: RouterBOARD 230
These devices have always been among the most solid performers. They
w
rotik
>
> Visit http://blog.butchevans.com/ for tutorials related to Mikrotik
> RouterOS
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20090303/64186270/attachment.html>
12 matches
Mail list logo
