All,
Have an issue where two of three IPsec tunnels (two aes and one 3des) are not
rebuilding and I have to manually login to "Kill connections" and then they
rebuild. Originally we had adjusted the Policy level to be "Unique" based on
recommendations from this list. It seems to have fixed the
Hi Jerry.
I hadn't used IPSEC on 5.26 so I can't advise about any bugs back then that may
now be fixed. Another thing is to never assume the other end doesn't also have
bugs.
The only time require vs unique should come into play would be when there were
more than one subnet at one end of
Hi Alexander,
Thanks for the quick response.
We are running 5.26 on all 750's and the firmware is 3.19. There is an initial
tunnel that has been up on these boxes to a Juniper that never goes down. The
tunnel to the Cisco was added months later and of course to different subnet.
So I see the
Hi Jerry
I don't have specific experience with Cisco at the far end. However are there
more that a single subnet at either end of the link?
I have found that some other providers default to "unique" for SA's while the
Mikrotik defaults to "require". This can mean that it fails to maintain the
Hey all,
Need your expertise. We have MikroTik 750's building IPsec tunnels using aes128
to a Cisco router. Our script initially brings up the tunnel via a ping (runs 3
pings every minute) and tunnel will run until the lifetime expires (I believe)
but after it expires, it never rebuilds. We
All,
Can main mode IPsec be used with sites that have dynamic IP assignments on a
750? (DHCP, PPPOE)? I haven't attempted yet and we have hundreds using
aggressive but customer wants to migrate.
Thanks!
Jerry Roy
Tolt Solutions
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was
Working? :)
*Jerry Roy*
Sr. Systems Engineer
MTCNA/MTCRE/MTCTCE
1 949 681 5054
1 562 305 9545 Cell
Unity Network Services
*An iPass Company*
125 Technology Drive
Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Rick Smith onyx3...@gmail.com wrote:
Doylestown = Spoke side...
I get the point of initiating from the spoke to the hub... so, I killed /
flushed ALL connections on both sides.
Pinged from the spoke to the other side of the hub, and everything came up
- remote peers, installed SA's, etc... but I can STILL see the individual
packets... That's not good...
Look at your Nat if this is split tunnel.
You should nat thru tunnel and masquerade to internet
*Jerry Roy*
Sr. Systems Engineer
MTCNA/MTCRE/MTCTCE
1 949 681 5054
1 562 305 9545 Cell
Unity Network Services
*An iPass Company*
125 Technology Drive
Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92618
On Tue, Apr 8,
Split tunnel means allow traffic destined to the other end to be encrypted
and all the remaining traffic defined straight to the internet vs. single
tunnel which all traffic is encrypted and sent thru the tunnel to the other
side. After I looked at it, you do have split tunnel ;)
*Jerry Roy*
Sr.
what do you mean by split tunnel ?
I've got the standard ip firewall rules in as rule 0 to allow all this back
and forth traffic as un-masq'd.
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Jerry Roy j...@ipass.com wrote:
Look at your Nat if this is split tunnel.
You should nat thru tunnel and
send an export of the spoke side.
Thanks
*Jerry Roy*
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mail.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20140407/898400f2/attachment.html
___
Mikrotik mailing list
Looks like the attachment was scrubbed. email to j...@ipass.com, lets see
if that will work :)
*Jerry*
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://mail.butchevans.com/pipermail/mikrotik/attachments/20140407/3a921920/attachment.html
Doylestown = Spoke side...
Thanks jerry.
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Jerry Roy j...@ipass.com wrote:
send an export of the spoke side.
Thanks
*Jerry Roy*
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
Guys,
Trying to get some ipSEC stuff running here.
We have a cloud router running in a datacenter with a public IP. I want
remote site to site tunnels running with IPSec configs to tunnel remote
offices here.
Followed the Mikrotik Manual for IPSec Site to Site using the
192.168.80/.90 example,
On 01/23/2014 11:58 PM, Butch Evans wrote:
This is true if you set the generate policy option in the IPSec
Peer. If you manually configure the policy, you define the source IP
to be used as the SA Src Address field. While I haven't tried it, I
would imagine that some creative policy routes
Not sure if this applies to your configuration, but I recently ran into
the same symptom in two similar cases. The short version is, regardless
of what the config and logs say, the IPSec packets will have a source IP
of the pref-src value for the route matching the IPSec endpoint. Example...
connect
to 1.2.3.4, it does.
We have a winner!!! Have to use the IP speaking OSPF or BGP in the
direction of the client. That makes things interesting with 8 paths
into router at the centrally located office. In the future, I will try
to remember MikroTik IPsec VPN concentrators must be single-homed
All,
We have an IPSec hub and spoke design. I have a 750GL (spoke) that is
connected via IPsec back to a Juniper (Hub). I initiate the connection from
the 750 and it creates a tunnel (2 SA's) and then I can ping to a device
sitting behind the Juniper. If I try and ping back from the device behind
I just realized this was not included.
/ip ipsec proposal
set [ find default=yes ] auth-algorithms=sha1 disabled=no
enc-algorithms=3des lifetime=30m name=default pfs-group=modp1024
add auth-algorithms=sha1 disabled=no enc-algorithms=3des lifetime=30m
name=juniper pfs-group=none
/ip ipsec peer
add
What does everybody use for IPSec Remote End User Client Software to
terminate to a MikroTik Router?
I do a lot of Branch Office setups (Tik to Tik) but have never done a Tik
to Windows or Tik to Mac OSX setup.
-TJ
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
Generally, I do PPTP, but you should be able to do L2TP+IPSEC:
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/MikroTik_RouterOS_and_Windows_XP_IPSec/L2TP
TJ Burbank mailto:tjburb...@gmail.com
August 27, 2012 10:03
What does everybody use for IPSec Remote End User Client Software to
terminate to a MikroTik
hello folks
i'm traveling these days and i'lle love to be in my home network
i have a iPhone4S
i want to do IPSec or L2TP (no pptp) into my rb493G
any idea please?
IPSec look very complicated... no OpenVPN in iOs. no Jailbreack.
thank you
Meftah Tayeb
IT Consulting
http://www.tmvoip.com/
Hi, this is that you need :-)
# Server Preshared (1234567abcdef) config
/interface l2tp-server server set enabled=yes
/ip ipsec proposal
set [ find default=yes ] auth-algorithms=sha1 disabled=no
enc-algorithms=3des,aes-256 \
lifetime=30m name=default pfs-group=modp1024
/ip ipsec peer add
mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] IPSec for mobile
Hi, this is that you need :-)
# Server Preshared (1234567abcdef) config
/interface l2tp-server server set enabled=yes
/ip ipsec proposal
set [ find default=yes ] auth
thank you DUDE, shortly!
- Original Message -
From: Sim simvi...@gmail.com
To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] IPSec for mobile
iPhone IPsec is for Cisco (see logo).
Use L2TP+IPsec (first choice
How are the IP addresses at the end siginificant. That is the part I can't
wrap my head around with tunnels. I get the it will assign IPs to the
endpoints on the tunnel but are they just arbitrary, non-routable
addresses? Is the iPhone in this case going to find itself attached to this
router but
You can use send all traffic over iPhone or use the same internal
IPs (with proxyarp)
2012/8/22 Ty Featherling tyfeatherl...@gmail.com:
How are the IP addresses at the end siginificant. That is the part I can't
wrap my head around with tunnels. I get the it will assign IPs to the
endpoints on
: [Mikrotik] IPSec for mobile
iPhone IPsec is for Cisco (see logo).
Use L2TP+IPsec (first choice on your mobile device)
Regards
2012/8/22 Meftah Tayeb tayeb.mef...@gmail.com:
thank you a lot !
is L2TP required?
or IPSec can work alone ?
- Original Message - From: Sim simvi
-Size=4
[admin@Edge01-493-Alger] /ppp secret
- Original Message - From: Sim simvi...@gmail.com
To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 4:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] IPSec for mobile
iPhone IPsec is for Cisco (see logo).
Use L2TP
question, sim
is l2tp itself alone good?
i think it's working only L2TP.
- Original Message -
From: Sim simvi...@gmail.com
To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 9:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] IPSec for mobile
The config posted
working only L2TP.
- Original Message - From: Sim simvi...@gmail.com
To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 9:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] IPSec for mobile
The config posted in precedent email is correct and work in my 3 Mikrotik.
Have
, 2012 9:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] IPSec for mobile
For security reason L2TP isn't good.
Ipsec + L2TP is the only way supported by iPhone (it ask you
security/secret and not only password).
You can also check this:
http://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/MikroTik_RouterOS_and_Windows_XP_IPSec/L2TP
My post
- From: Sim simvi...@gmail.com
To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 9:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] IPSec for mobile
For security reason L2TP isn't good.
Ipsec + L2TP is the only way supported by iPhone (it ask you
security/secret and not only
Message - From: Sim simvi...@gmail.com
To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 9:50 PM
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] IPSec for mobile
For security reason L2TP isn't good.
Ipsec + L2TP is the only way supported by iPhone (it ask you
security/secret
- Original Message - From: Sim simvi...@gmail.com
To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] IPSec for mobile
Reduce lacency?
Contact your 3G/WiFi/Provider ;-
Bye!
2012/8/22 Meftah Tayeb tayeb.mef
Hi all you Guru's :)
I have a hub and spoke Ipsec VPN network. On the hub side is Juniper
router. We have 900 Cisco 881 routers on the spoke side all with standard
broadband links (pppoe, dhcp and static w/dsl, cable or wireless)
connecting back to it. We have a loopback address assigned on each
Oh, it is my mistake, it is OpenVPN that does not support UDP mode.
So, if we are using OpenVPN, we can still using UDP/VOIP inside the tunnel?
Thanks.
Anto
Chupaka wrote:
Please give us a link. OpenVPN in RouterOS does not support UDP mode. I
haven't heard about any such limitations in
Sure, any IP traffic inside any tunnel.
2012/7/13 Damai damai7...@yahoo.com.sg
Oh, it is my mistake, it is OpenVPN that does not support UDP mode.
So, if we are using OpenVPN, we can still using UDP/VOIP inside the tunnel?
Thanks.
Anto
Chupaka wrote:
Please give us a link. OpenVPN in
Please give us a link. OpenVPN in RouterOS does not support UDP mode. I
haven't heard about any such limitations in IPSec. And definitely it should
not affect traffic inside the tunnel, so VoIP will work.
2012/7/9 Damai damai7...@yahoo.com.sg
Hi All,
I've read that IPSec VPN in Mikrotik does
Hi All,
I've read that IPSec VPN in Mikrotik does not support UDP.
So if we established the IPSec VPN connection with Mikrotik at any end,
then we cannot do VOIP thru the tunnel, right?
Please confirm.
We are going to make IPSec connection between Mikrotik RB1100AH and
Sonicwall.
Thanks.
Thanks Tim! I'll try 1400 and see if that provides for a more stable tunnel.
Dylan
On Jun 6, 2011, at 7:39 PM, Tim Payne wrote:
I had to set my MTU's to 1400... Still a little flakey.. Good Luck..
-tp
On Jun 6, 2011, at 8:36 AM, Dylan Bouterse wrote:
I have an IPSEC tunnel that has
I had to set my MTU's to 1400... Still a little flakey.. Good Luck..
-tp
On Jun 6, 2011, at 8:36 AM, Dylan Bouterse wrote:
I have an IPSEC tunnel that has been giving us fits since we switch from a
Pix to a RB750. There is location A that is at the main office with a RB750
(on a fiber
understand why it would matter.
It is a cisco ezvpn setup that the client was using. So I don't know if it is
all MT blame or some cisco as well.
--Original Message--
To: Mikrotik discussions
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] IPSec Tunnel won't Form over Wireless Link
Sent: Nov 10, 2010 10:19 PM
Good afternoon everyone.
I have a bit of problem for a big client that is trying to setup an
IPsec tunnel to their corporate offices.
The setup is as follows:
CoreRouter - L2Switch - AP - CPE
The router and switch are strictly vlan. The same vlans are being
handed out through the
Hey everyone,
I need to have a pc behind my MT connect to an ipsec vpn. My MT is src-nat'ing
my internal network as my public ip.
The error it always fails on is negociating security policy. The client
being used is Cisco VPN Client v5.0.01.0600.
Tried doing some google research, and most
Pptp is very easy. Can you do that?
Windows has a built in client.
On Jul 22, 2010 9:59 PM, Keith Barber ke...@reliablevi.com wrote:
Hey everyone,
I need to have a pc behind my MT connect to an ipsec vpn. My MT is
src-nat'ing my internal network as my public ip.
The error it always fails on
I haven't heard of any special configuration to allow ipsec but I could be
wrong. Did you check the mt forums?
On Jul 22, 2010 10:07 PM, Keith Barber ke...@reliablevi.com wrote:
Its for a global company that I'm sure is super paranoid. But plan to ask
if they can just do pptp in the am.
Hey Guys
After many sleepless hours we have managed to get ipsec running smoothly
between Mikrotik 4.9 and CISCO ASA.
I am glad to share configs if anyone is interested.
Kurt
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
Details:
Local network:
10.10.0.0/16
Remote networks
172.16.70.0/24
172.16.71.0/24
Local Public IP:
195.10.10.20
Remote Public IP:
202.10.10.20
/ip ipsec proposal
set default auth-algorithms=sha1 comment= disabled=no enc-algorithms=\
aes-256 lifetime=1h name=default pfs-group=modp1536
/ip
oops... My apologies that should be no.
I was doing some other tests and disabled these rules.
Thanks!
PS: There is a known bug with IPSEC between Mikrotik to Cisco if you have
multiple Peers.
I managed to duplicate this exact bug...
See: http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?f=2t=39243
Is there a procedure for creating IPSec ecurity certificates? I want to create
and use certificates on an IPSec link as an exercise. So can anyone explain
the proper way to create them and install them in a Tik box on each end. I
currently have the IPSec link is up and running just fine
: Re: [Mikrotik] IPSec
I had actually just gotten it fixed by trying the masquerade option before
Butch told me to do masquerade. That said, I have attached a map of what
we're working with. The NIF wireless and everything behind it cannot
communicate with anything across the IPSec link, though
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] IPSec
I had actually just gotten it fixed by trying the masquerade option before
Butch told me to do masquerade
: [Mikrotik] IPSec
Mike,
Does the IPSec tunnel encrypt any packets when you attempt to make a
connection from one side to the other?
Regards,
Paul
Mike Hammett wrote:
Actually, the darn thing stopped working once it started and without any
changes to either side. :-\
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /ip ipsec
@mail.butchevans.com
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 11:22 AM
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] IPSec
Mike,
Does the IPSec tunnel encrypt any packets when you attempt to make a
connection from one side to the other?
Regards,
Paul
Mike Hammett wrote:
Actually, the darn thing stopped working once it started
discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 11:33 PM
Subject: [Mikrotik] IPSec
I'm trying to setup a 3.10 IPSec tunnel between two Mikrotiks. First off,
the manual isn't correct. I do exactly what they say and I get an error.
As it turns out, you're also
: [Mikrotik] IPSec
So has anyone put together any step by step instructions on how to use
IPSec? It has always been a pain in my backside. What options are
there besides another Mikrotik on the client end? Software or
hardware.
Casey
On 6/7/08, Mike Hammett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had actually
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008, Mike Hammett wrote:
I'm trying to setup a 3.10 IPSec tunnel between two Mikrotiks.
First off, the manual isn't correct. I do exactly what they say
and I get an error. As it turns out, you're also required to
choose an AH In\Out Algorithm. It also doesn't explain things
: Butch Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 12:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Mikrotik] IPSec
On Fri, 6 Jun 2008, Mike Hammett wrote:
I'm trying to setup a 3.10 IPSec tunnel between two Mikrotiks.
First off, the manual isn't correct. I
PROTECTED]
To: Mikrotik discussions mikrotik@mail.butchevans.com
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 11:33 PM
Subject: [Mikrotik] IPSec
I'm trying to setup a 3.10 IPSec tunnel between two Mikrotiks. First off,
the manual isn't correct. I do exactly what they say and I get an error.
As it turns out
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Gene Spiker wrote:
Other versions of IPSec on other systems that work off a menu such
as winbox also build the interface and route.
Mikrotik uses a POLICY to route the traffic...there is not a route
(at least not one visible under /ip route) for IPSEC traffic.
In
62 matches
Mail list logo
