Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

2017-05-02 Thread Adair Winter via Mikrotik-users
Yep. Bgp and ccr's don't play well. x86 would be better. On May 2, 2017 11:35 PM, "Jesse DuPont via Mikrotik-users" < mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote: > He did say it was only a single core, not all cores together, that shows > 100% continuously. It is most likely BGP. > > *Jesse DuPont* > >

Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

2017-05-02 Thread Jesse DuPont via Mikrotik-users
He did say it was only a single core, not all cores together, that shows 100% continuously. It is most likely BGP. Jesse DuPont Network

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Small setup...

2017-05-02 Thread Dan Harling via Mikrotik-users
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 9:06 PM, Blair Davis via Mikrotik-users wrote: > I have a small network I need to modify > > There are three locations, each with a RB433GL on site. > > Port one of each RB433GL is linked to port one of the other two > RB433GL's via a wireless

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Small setup...

2017-05-02 Thread Blair Davis via Mikrotik-users
Never had to use them, so I don't know much about them... -- On 5/2/2017 9:09 PM, Christian Palecek wrote: Vlans? Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Blair Davis via Mikrotik-users Date: 5/2/17 7:06 PM

[Mikrotik Users] Small setup...

2017-05-02 Thread Blair Davis via Mikrotik-users
I have a small network I need to modify There are three locations, each with a RB433GL on site. Port one of each RB433GL is linked to port one of the other two RB433GL's via a wireless bridge. Port two and three each go off to a separate local LAN at each location, giving me six little LAN's

Re: [Mikrotik Users] Small setup...

2017-05-02 Thread Christian Palecek via Mikrotik-users
Vlans? Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Original message From: Blair Davis via Mikrotik-users Date: 5/2/17 7:06 PM (GMT-07:00) To: Mikrotik Users Subject: [Mikrotik Users] Small setup... I have a small

Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

2017-05-02 Thread Kevin Myers via Mikrotik-users
If you're advertising a large number of routes to your 31 peers (full or partial tables) then you'll need to adjust your routing architecture somewhat and consider using the CCR1072 more for transit and offload some of the peerings with a larger number of routes onto a CHR or x86 VM with a

Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

2017-05-02 Thread Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users
They never said there would be multi-threaded BGP, they have optimized it, that's it, they are NOT going to have a multi-threaded BGP session, well not from what I understand. However, they did get the BGP process to behave much faster, 10x fold from what I can tell, but alas, v7 is

Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

2017-05-02 Thread Dennis Burgess via Mikrotik-users
Sounds like you have extra rules in there that is causing high load. I would have to look at it to be cirtan, but there should not be any reason for 100% cpu. Maybe on one core, but not all .. Dennis Burgess www.linktechs.net - 314-735-0270 x103 -

Re: [Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

2017-05-02 Thread Chris Wright via Mikrotik-users
For several years it's been said that multi-threaded BGP processing will be supported in RouterOS v7. And if you remember that RouterOS v7's long-awaited release was an April Fools' joke THREE YEARS AGO that'll give you an idea

[Mikrotik Users] High routing CPU load

2017-05-02 Thread Kevin Sullivan via Mikrotik-users
All, We have an edge router, CCR1072, that has a few 10g internet ports and a 10g connection back to the rest of the network. We're only passing ~1g at peak times currently, but the resources display shows 100% CPU on one of the cores continuously. If we look at the load profiler, it says