David F. Skoll wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116192
>
> That wasn't a locking bug. It was a weird bug whereby Berkeley DB
> would, for no reason at all, sleep for one second whenever it needed
> to allocate memory!
>
> It's still present in Fedora Core 1, I believ
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
> F. Skoll
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 12:22 PM
> To: mimedefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
> Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] BIG problems with mimedefang
>
>
> Lisa Casey wrote:
>
> [classic sym
David F. Skoll wrote:
>
> Could you be thinking of this bug?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116192
>
> That wasn't a locking bug. It was a weird bug whereby Berkeley DB
> would, for no reason at all, sleep for one second whenever it needed
> to allocate memory!
>
> I
Gary Funck wrote:
> If I recall correctly, 2/3 years ago, there was a particular version
> of the Berkeley DB implementation that was bugging, esp. with respect
> to locking (or lack thereof). It might've been in the Perl DB wrapper.
Could you be thinking of this bug?
https://bugzilla.redhat.co
David F. Skoll wrote:
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 5:37 PM
>
> If that's the case, SpamAssassin has a seriously broken BerkeleyDB Bayes
> implementation.
>
If I recall correctly, 2/3 years ago, there was a particular version
of the Berkeley DB implementation that was bugging, esp. with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Once you get beyond a certain traffic level the BerkeleyDB
> implementation of the Bayes database becomes a bottleneck and you
> need to move to a SQL-daemon database.
If that's the case, SpamAssassin has a seriously broken BerkeleyDB Bayes
implementation.
In CanIt, we
Lisa Casey wrote:
> To delete the bayes database do I just delete
> /var/spool/spamassassin/bayes_seen
> /var/spool/spamassassin/bayes_toks
> /var/spool/spamassassin/_seen
> /var/spool/spamassassin/_toks
Well, whatever your bayes_path is set to... (note it's not really a path,
really more of a fi
Gary Funck wrote:
> Might be a good guess, but why did this suddenly start becoming
> a problem?
The OP was probably just lucky until now. :-)
> Can the
> mimedefang "master" somehow start the slaves so they can
> later be debugged, or is there a related technique?
You can strace them, but ther
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
> F. Skoll
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 2:03 PM
> To: mimedefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
> Subject: Re: [Mimedefang] BIG problems with mimedefang
>
>
> Gary Funck wrote:
>
> > Lisa Casey
Gary Funck wrote:
> Lisa Casey wrote:
>> 11859 defang 10 0 30572 20M 1852 D 6.3 4.0 0:10 mimedefang.pl
>> 11657 defang 10 0 30172 9252 1820 D 3.0 1.8 0:07 mimedefang.pl
>> 11652 defang 9 0 29184 8400 1832 D 2.9 1.6 0:07 mimedefang.pl
> Try running strace on one of those busy slaves to see what
>
> From: Lisa Casey
> Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 12:02 PM
> To: mimedefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
> Subject: [Mimedefang] BIG problems with mimedefang
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm running Redhat 7.2 This computer functions as a Radius
> server (cistron
> radius 1.6.7) and as a mail server (se
Philip Prindeville wrote:
> Give me 3 hours to bang out some updates to the man page.
No need; I already did it.
Regards,
David.
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal boilerplate in the above
message, it is NULL AND VOID. You may ignore i
I was looking at this module, and noticed a couple of short-comings.
(1) it doesn't return a failure code, only blurts a message via "confess"
with things go wrong;
(2) it doesn't allow you to save a pointer into each address block/range
and then retrieve it later and allow you to use it as
Give me 3 hours to bang out some updates to the man page.
-Philip
MIMEDefang 2.55-BETA-3 is available at http://www.mimedefang.org/node.php?id=1
The biggest change since BETA-2 is support for the filter_helo function,
courtesy of Philip Prindeville. Please note that in my tests with Sendmail
Hi,
. . .
I have seen the same thing happen when the SA Bayes database gets
corrupt. Basically, SA hangs until MD times it out which causes the
whole slave to hang. Maybe someone here can give you a better
solution, but mine was to delete the database and relearn all my
corpus. SA rebuilds ne
> Hi,
>
> I'm running Redhat 7.2 This computer functions as a Radius server (cistron
> radius 1.6.7) and as a mail server (sendmail 8.12.6) which also runs
> MIMEDefang 2.48 and SpamAssassin version 3.0.1 running on Perl version
> 5.8.5.
>
. . .
I have seen the same thing happen when the SA Baye
Lisa Casey wrote:
[classic symptoms of an overloaded system.]
First question: do you have /var/spool/MIMEDefang on a RAMdisk? If not,
fix it now!
Next: It looks like you have 512MB of memory. You don't want to increase
MX_MAXIMUM much beyond around 20, or the server will start swapping.
How m
Matthew.van.Eerde wrote:
> Lisa Casey wrote:
>> Mem: 512900K av, 509840K used, 3060K free, 0K shrd, 1800K buff
>> Swap: 522072K av, 520104K used, 1968K free 5204K cached
>> PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND ...
>> 11859 defang 10 0 30572 20M 1852 D 6.3 4.0 0:10 mimedefang.p
Lisa Casey wrote:
> I discovered
> that my max slaves was set to 10 and increased that to 30 hoping that
> would solve the problem. It hasn't. Here's what I'm seeing. Things
> will be going along ok, then suddenly the server load will shoot up
> from 0.something to over 30! When that happens mail
Matthew van Eerde wrote:
> Kris Deugau wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> I may be able to get them. How well does RHEL 3 handle 50 addresses
>>> bound to one NIC?
>>
>> I should note that this does NOTHING to help or hinder with respect
>> to multi-domain emails; everything still travels th
Hi,
I'm running Redhat 7.2 This computer functions as a Radius server (cistron
radius 1.6.7) and as a mail server (sendmail 8.12.6) which also runs
MIMEDefang 2.48 and SpamAssassin version 3.0.1 running on Perl version
5.8.5.
This setup has been working great up until this past weekend. I
Kris Deugau wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I may be able to get them. How well does RHEL 3 handle 50 addresses
>> bound to one NIC?
>
> I should note that this does NOTHING to help or hinder with respect to
> multi-domain emails; everything still travels through a single
> sendmail/mimedef
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 12:59, Kris Deugau wrote:
> From experience I can say that RH7.3 handles that just fine (actually,
> at one point that box had 200 IPs bound to one NIC). WBEL should be
> pretty much the same.
>
> It *does* get a little loopy about outbound connections of any knd
> thou
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 11:16, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
> > > I may be able to get them. How well does RHEL 3 handle 50 addresses
> > > bound to one NIC?
> >
> > Linux in general - according to this guy you can get up to 100K IP
> addresses on a single NIC with no problem:
> >
> > http://www.perturb.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I may be able to get them. How well does RHEL 3 handle 50 addresses bound
to one NIC?
From experience I can say that RH7.3 handles that just fine (actually,
at one point that box had 200 IPs bound to one NIC). WBEL should be
pretty much the same.
It *does* get a l
Your on the ball tonight David lol - replied before my almost instant reply
to ignore me being stoopid!
Cheers
Mack
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of David
F. Skoll
Sent: 18 January 2006 18:11
To: mimedefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
Subject:
Does this mean that filter_recipient still get's called if you issue the
reject in in filter_helo ?
If so, I'm not sure what advantage this gives as the code in filter_recipent
can check the helo value and reject/tempfail quite happily ?
or can you use
return if message_rejected(); # Avoid unnec
Mack wrote:
> Does this mean that filter_recipient still get's called if you issue the
> reject in in filter_helo ?
No. Rejecting in filter_helo means no more callbacks into MIMEDefang.
Regards,
David.
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other lega
Ignore My previous - I misread the sequence
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mack
Sent: 18 January 2006 18:06
To: mimedefang@lists.roaringpenguin.com
Subject: RE: [Mimedefang] MIMEDefang 2.55-BETA-3 is available
Does this mean that filter_re
It's W32/Blackmal.e from symantec and W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] from NAI.
I believe that NAI just released an update for it in just the past 2
minutes. dat-4677.zip was punblished at 8AM their time and then removed and
republished at 10AM.
Regards,
KAM
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PRO
It looks like a new virus spreads using (among others) .mim files... this could
be a good candidate for bad_filename.
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
> > I may be able to get them. How well does RHEL 3 handle 50 addresses
> > bound to one NIC?
>
> Linux in general - according to this guy you can get up to 100K IP
addresses on a single NIC with no problem:
>
> http://www.perturb.org/display/entry/708/favicon.ico
I'm at 71 on one single box and
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > That sounds like a good idea, if you have the IP addresses
> to spare...
> > if not you'll need to do some SWIPing.
>
> I may be able to get them. How well does RHEL 3 handle 50
> addresses bound to one NIC?
I haven't run that man
WBrowne wrote:
> Matthew van Eerde wrote on 01/18/2006
> 11:02:37 AM:
>
>
>> That sounds like a good idea, if you have the IP addresses to
>> spare... if not you'll need to do some SWIPing.
>
> I may be able to get them. How well does RHEL 3 handle 50 addresses
> bound to one NIC?
Linux in gen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/18/2006 11:02:37
AM:
> That sounds like a good idea, if you have the IP addresses to
> spare... if not you'll need to do some SWIPing.
I may be able to get them. How well does RHEL 3 handle 50 addresses bound
to one NIC?
WBrown wrote:
> DFS wrote on 01/17/2006 03:35:08 PM:
> What would be the downside to binding 50 or more IP addresses, one for
> each domain handled to the NIC on an RHEL 3 box and giving each domain
> their own IP address on the box?
That sounds like a good idea, if you have the IP addresses to sp
DFS wrote on 01/18/2006 10:41:06 AM:
> It depends on the MTA. I believe Sendmail is smart enough to notice
that
> both MX hosts have the same IP address, and send the mail over one SMTP
> session.
I sort of expected that to be the case. That's why I asked the follow up
question.
> Well, the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Speaking of stram_by_domain, Is there any way to get mail from the same
> source, but to different domains to be sent on different connections?
It depends on the MTA. I believe Sendmail is smart enough to notice that
both MX hosts have the same IP address, and send the
DFS wrote on 01/17/2006 03:35:08 PM:
> It's hairy, but manageable. Doing per-recipient content-filtering is
> a lot hairier and less managable; we have to use hacks like
> stream_by_domain or stream_by_recipient. Unfortunately, that's just how
> SMTP works.
Speaking of stram_by_domain, Is there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
MIMEDefang 2.55-BETA-3 is available at http://www.mimedefang.org/node.php?id=1
The biggest change since BETA-2 is support for the filter_helo function,
courtesy of Philip Prindeville. Please note that in my tests with Sendmail
8.13.4, Sendmail
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:34:24PM +1300, Roland Pope wrote:
> From: "Jan Pieter Cornet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I assume signal 14 is a SIGALRM. If "kill -l" on your system doesn't show
> > "14) SIGALRM" in the output somewhere, then the below is invalid.
>
> Yes 14 is SIGALRM
>
> > If it's a pe
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Pieter Cornet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I assume signal 14 is a SIGALRM. If "kill -l" on your system doesn't show
> "14) SIGALRM" in the output somewhere, then the below is invalid.
Yes 14 is SIGALRM
> If it's a perl module that uses alarm() and then fails t
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:37:31PM +1300, Roland Pope wrote:
> I posted an email some time back asking about MD slaves that were
> unexpectedly terminating with a signal 14. David Skoll mentioned at the time
> that it was possibly a perl module generating this signal 14 which was
> somehow not bein
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 03:33:38PM -0800, Gary Funck wrote:
> OK, and what about the question raised as to how incoming mailers
> might react if, for example, tempfailed at HELO time, and related
> questions?
I asked that merely out of curiousity, since it's not common to reject
after HELO, so it'
44 matches
Mail list logo
