Re: [Mimedefang] documentation bug/omission for newbies

2016-04-20 Thread Bill Cole
On 20 Apr 2016, at 11:46, starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote: On Tue, Apr 19 2016 20:58 -0400 Dianne Skoll dfs at roaringpenguin.com wrote: Here it has taken me a couple of days to get up to speed, but just looking at that Microsoft picture would have taken me to the same place in 15 minutes.

Re: [Mimedefang] documentation bug/omission for newbies

2016-04-20 Thread starlight . 2016q2
>On Tue, Apr 19 2016 20:58 -0400 Dianne Skoll dfs at roaringpenguin.com wrote: >> >> Here it has taken me a couple of days to >> get up to speed, but just looking at that Microsoft >> picture would have taken me to the same place in >> 15 minutes. > >Oh, you mean like slide #52 of my slide deck?

Re: [Mimedefang] documentation bug/omission for newbies

2016-04-20 Thread Dianne Skoll
Hi, Just a general comment: If someone hands you a MIME::Entity object, you shouldn't assume it's single-part. Nor should you assume it's multi-part. Your code should adapt to whatever it has been given. It turns out MIMEDefang does always start out with a multipart (for boring technical

Re: [Mimedefang] documentation bug/omission for newbies

2016-04-20 Thread Steffen Kaiser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote: At 02:58 4/19/2016 -0400, Steffen Kaiser skmimedef...@smail.inf.fh-bonn-rhein-sieg.de wrote: On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, starlight.2016q2 at binnacle.cx wrote: I just spent a day butting my head