On Aug 11, 2015, at 9:06 PM, Dianne Skoll d...@roaringpenguin.com wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 16:24:25 -0600
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
You'll take a patch?
Possibly, but I think I've made my feelings pretty clear, that filter_helo
is not really
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:00:44 -0600
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
What about adding ${tls_version} to the list of parameters to
filter_helo?
Feel free.
Regards,
Dianne.
___
NOTE: If there is a disclaimer or other legal
On 08/11/2015 03:25 PM, Dianne Skoll wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:00:44 -0600
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
What about adding ${tls_version} to the list of parameters to
filter_helo?
Feel free.
Regards,
Dianne.
You'll take a patch?
On 08/04/2015 02:11 PM, Dianne Skoll wrote:
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 14:45:42 -0400
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
On 8/4/2015 2:02 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Is there any other way to figure out if this is HELO that follows a
STARTTLS?
Save state and re-call the helo check again
On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 16:24:25 -0600
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
You'll take a patch?
Possibly, but I think I've made my feelings pretty clear, that filter_helo
is not really something I like in MIMEDefang. I'd prefer to remove it,
to be honest. But yes, if you
On Aug 4, 6:04pm, Philip Prindeville wrote:
} On 08/04/2015 02:11 PM, Dianne Skoll wrote:
}
} This is why I resisted even adding a filter_helo callback. It's
} basically useless. Anything you can do in filter_helo might as well
} be deferred to filter_sender.
}
} If an SMTP client
On Tue, 04 Aug 2015 18:04:32 -0600
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
[...]
Potentially, yes... If it's doing a denial of service attack I might
want to notice the rate of incoming connections, save them into a .db
file, and start blocking them in filter_relay()
On 08/04/2015 02:11 PM, Dianne Skoll wrote:
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 14:45:42 -0400
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
On 8/4/2015 2:02 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Is there any other way to figure out if this is HELO that follows a
STARTTLS?
Save state and re-call the helo check again
On Jul 29, 2015, at 7:22 PM, Philip Prindeville
philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
On 07/28/2015 08:17 PM, Dianne Skoll wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 14:27:45 -0600
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
Am I correctly seeing that filter_helo() is being
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 14:45:42 -0400
Kevin A. McGrail kmcgr...@pccc.com wrote:
On 8/4/2015 2:02 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Is there any other way to figure out if this is HELO that follows a
STARTTLS?
Save state and re-call the helo check again in filter_sender, perhaps?
This is why I
On 04/08/15 21:20, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
On 8/4/2015 4:11 PM, Dianne Skoll wrote:
This is why I resisted even adding a filter_helo callback. It's
basically useless. Anything you can do in filter_helo might as well
be deferred to filter_sender.
+1
If an SMTP client connects, says EHLO
On 8/4/2015 4:11 PM, Dianne Skoll wrote:
This is why I resisted even adding a filter_helo callback. It's
basically useless. Anything you can do in filter_helo might as well
be deferred to filter_sender.
+1
If an SMTP client connects, says EHLO and then closes the connection...
do we really
On Tue, 4 Aug 2015 12:02:16 -0600
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
Err, cipher_bits… or tls_version… except that, if I remember
correctly, these can’t be accessed until after filter_sender(), right?
True, in MIMEDefang. The symbols are available via the milter API,
On 8/4/2015 2:02 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote:
Err, cipher_bits… or tls_version… except that, if I remember correctly, these
can’t be accessed until after filter_sender(), right?
Is there any other way to figure out if this is HELO that follows a STARTTLS?
Save state and re-call the helo
On 07/28/2015 08:17 PM, Dianne Skoll wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 14:27:45 -0600
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
Am I correctly seeing that filter_helo() is being called twice for
the same connection? Looks that way.
I bet the sequence was:
EHLO
STARTTLS
EHLO
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 14:27:45 -0600
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
Am I correctly seeing that filter_helo() is being called twice for
the same connection? Looks that way.
I bet the sequence was:
EHLO
STARTTLS
EHLO (this time over the encrypted connection)
On Jul 27, 2015, at 10:12 AM, Philip Prindeville
philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
On Jul 27, 2015, at 8:07 AM, Dianne Skoll d...@roaringpenguin.com wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:11:09 -0600
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
Update: I changed the
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:11:09 -0600
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
Update: I changed the timeout argument to T=S:2m;R:2m;E:10m and
rebuilt sendmail.cf, then restarted the service.
The problem seems to have gone away, but I’m not sure why.
Obviously, your filter
On Jul 27, 2015, at 8:07 AM, Dianne Skoll d...@roaringpenguin.com wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 00:11:09 -0600
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
Update: I changed the timeout argument to T=S:2m;R:2m;E:10m and
rebuilt sendmail.cf, then restarted the service.
The
On Jul 26, 2015, at 11:26 PM, Philip Prindeville
philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
On Jul 26, 2015, at 7:42 PM, Dianne Skoll d...@roaringpenguin.com wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 18:03:38 -0600
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
Jul 26 17:44:31 mail
I’m running mimedefang-2.78-2 on Fedora 21, along with sendmail-8.14.9-5.
I’m seeing errors when getting email from vger.kernel.org (I get several kernel
hacking mailing lists), and getting sporadic delivery.
It seems to start when vger connects every 20 minutes or so and attempts to
deliver a
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 18:03:38 -0600
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
Jul 26 17:44:31 mail mimedefang[31780]: t6QNhOYb027848:
smfi_addheader returned MI_FAILURE
Sendmail timed out (that's in the Milter (mimedefang): timeout before
data read log line) so it tempfailed
On Jul 26, 2015, at 7:42 PM, Dianne Skoll d...@roaringpenguin.com wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 18:03:38 -0600
Philip Prindeville philipp_s...@redfish-solutions.com wrote:
Jul 26 17:44:31 mail mimedefang[31780]: t6QNhOYb027848:
smfi_addheader returned MI_FAILURE
Sendmail timed out (that's
23 matches
Mail list logo
