Re: [Mimedefang] clamav-unofficial-sigs and pyzor

2016-09-19 Thread Marcus Schopen
Am Montag, den 19.09.2016, 08:36 -0400 schrieb Dianne Skoll: > On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 07:46:11 +0200 > Marcus Schopen wrote: > > > my be a little bit off topic, but are there any experience with the > > efficiency of pyzor and clamav-unofficial-sigs [1]. > > No comment on pyzor because I don't use

Re: [Mimedefang] clamav-unofficial-sigs and pyzor

2016-09-19 Thread Dianne Skoll
On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 07:46:11 +0200 Marcus Schopen wrote: > my be a little bit off topic, but are there any experience with the > efficiency of pyzor and clamav-unofficial-sigs [1]. No comment on pyzor because I don't use it, but some of the clamav-unofficial-sigs are useful. We use the followin

Re: [Mimedefang] clamav-unofficial-sigs and pyzor

2016-09-19 Thread Richard Laager
On 09/19/2016 01:48 AM, Marcus Schopen wrote: > Did you activate all signatures > or just e.g. sanesecurity sigs? I read activating all signatures turns > clamav into an evil memory monster, while only activating sanesecurity > sigs catches most and doesn't need that much resources. I don't adjust

Re: [Mimedefang] clamav-unofficial-sigs and pyzor

2016-09-18 Thread Marcus Schopen
Hi Richard, Am Montag, den 19.09.2016, 01:23 -0500 schrieb Richard Laager: > On 09/19/2016 12:46 AM, Marcus Schopen wrote: > > my be a little bit off topic, but are there any experience with the > > efficiency of pyzor and clamav-unofficial-sigs > > We use clamav-unofficial-sigs. If clamd trigger

Re: [Mimedefang] clamav-unofficial-sigs and pyzor

2016-09-18 Thread Richard Laager
On 09/19/2016 12:46 AM, Marcus Schopen wrote: > my be a little bit off topic, but are there any experience with the > efficiency of pyzor and clamav-unofficial-sigs We use clamav-unofficial-sigs. If clamd triggers, it's a hard fail for us, regardless of whether it was a virus or spam rule. We do d