[Mingw-w64-public] [patch] fix vsprintf_s buffer overflow

2014-09-21 Thread JonY
Put in some basic effort to avoid overflows. Our vsprintf_s doesn't do anything like the standard's yet, but at least it no longer tries to write over the boundary. Patch OK? diff --git a/mingw-w64-crt/secapi/vsprintf_s.c b/mingw-w64-crt/secapi/vsprintf_s.c index 0ad1ef7..9e82bda 100644 ---

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] math: Final ARM changes

2014-09-21 Thread Kai Tietz
Hi André, Patch is ok. Please apply \o/ Thanks, Kai 2014-09-21 18:16 GMT+02:00 André Hentschel n...@dawncrow.de: Please review, i'll commit it, just need an OK. After this patchset the crt builds on ARM!! Yay Remaining todos on ARM: softmath: correct error handling on bad

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] math: Final ARM changes

2014-09-21 Thread Vincent Torri
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 6:16 PM, André Hentschel n...@dawncrow.de wrote: Please review, i'll commit it, just need an OK. After this patchset the crt builds on ARM!! Yay great news ! and great job !!! Vincent Remaining todos on ARM: softmath: correct error handling on bad input

[Mingw-w64-public] cherrypick request

2014-09-21 Thread André Hentschel
Hi, someone should cherry-pick this into stable branches: 997b3564e412f33dccb1cb4671ffdb10d3507cd2 -- Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] cherrypick request

2014-09-21 Thread Ozkan Sezer
On 9/21/14, André Hentschel n...@dawncrow.de wrote: Hi, someone should cherry-pick this into stable branches: 997b3564e412f33dccb1cb4671ffdb10d3507cd2 Cherry-picked into v1.x, v2.x and v3.x, and pushed. -- O.S. --

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] cherrypick request

2014-09-21 Thread André Hentschel
Am 21.09.2014 um 20:05 schrieb Ozkan Sezer: On 9/21/14, André Hentschel n...@dawncrow.de wrote: Hi, someone should cherry-pick this into stable branches: 997b3564e412f33dccb1cb4671ffdb10d3507cd2 Cherry-picked into v1.x, v2.x and v3.x, and pushed. Thx

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] stdio/math: Various implementations and more for ARM (v2)

2014-09-21 Thread dw
On 9/20/2014 8:07 AM, André Hentschel wrote: Am 19.09.2014 um 17:30 schrieb Kai Tietz: 2014-09-19 1:34 GMT+02:00 dw limegreenso...@yahoo.com: For the parts that are working around a compiler bug: - Does it make sense to list the bug number in the comment? I think it makes sense in general.

[Mingw-w64-public] [Patch] Revert recently added C++-ism

2014-09-21 Thread JonY
Patch OK? diff --git a/mingw-w64-headers/include/http.h b/mingw-w64-headers/include/http.h index 7a9f3c7..65f18e2 100644 --- a/mingw-w64-headers/include/http.h +++ b/mingw-w64-headers/include/http.h @@ -207,8 +207,8 @@ extern C { PVOID pInfo; } HTTP_REQUEST_INFO,

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [Patch] Revert recently added C++-ism

2014-09-21 Thread Raffaello D. Di Napoli
2014-09-21 18:12 GMT-04:00 JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net: Patch OK? ... + typedef struct _HTTP_REQUEST_V2 { +struct HTTP_REQUEST_V1; ... + typedef struct _HTTP_RESPONSE_V2 { +struct HTTP_RESPONSE_V1; Shouldn’t the V1 sub-struct declaration be a variable declaration (and include