Put in some basic effort to avoid overflows. Our vsprintf_s doesn't do anything
like the standard's yet, but at least it no longer tries to write over the
boundary.
Patch OK?
diff --git a/mingw-w64-crt/secapi/vsprintf_s.c
b/mingw-w64-crt/secapi/vsprintf_s.c
index 0ad1ef7..9e82bda 100644
---
Hi André,
Patch is ok. Please apply \o/
Thanks,
Kai
2014-09-21 18:16 GMT+02:00 André Hentschel n...@dawncrow.de:
Please review, i'll commit it, just need an OK.
After this patchset the crt builds on ARM!! Yay
Remaining todos on ARM:
softmath: correct error handling on bad
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 6:16 PM, André Hentschel n...@dawncrow.de wrote:
Please review, i'll commit it, just need an OK.
After this patchset the crt builds on ARM!! Yay
great news ! and great job !!!
Vincent
Remaining todos on ARM:
softmath: correct error handling on bad input
Hi,
someone should cherry-pick this into stable branches:
997b3564e412f33dccb1cb4671ffdb10d3507cd2
--
Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
On 9/21/14, André Hentschel n...@dawncrow.de wrote:
Hi,
someone should cherry-pick this into stable branches:
997b3564e412f33dccb1cb4671ffdb10d3507cd2
Cherry-picked into v1.x, v2.x and v3.x, and pushed.
--
O.S.
--
Am 21.09.2014 um 20:05 schrieb Ozkan Sezer:
On 9/21/14, André Hentschel n...@dawncrow.de wrote:
Hi,
someone should cherry-pick this into stable branches:
997b3564e412f33dccb1cb4671ffdb10d3507cd2
Cherry-picked into v1.x, v2.x and v3.x, and pushed.
Thx
On 9/20/2014 8:07 AM, André Hentschel wrote:
Am 19.09.2014 um 17:30 schrieb Kai Tietz:
2014-09-19 1:34 GMT+02:00 dw limegreenso...@yahoo.com:
For the parts that are working around a compiler bug:
- Does it make sense to list the bug number in the comment?
I think it makes sense in general.
Patch OK?
diff --git a/mingw-w64-headers/include/http.h b/mingw-w64-headers/include/http.h
index 7a9f3c7..65f18e2 100644
--- a/mingw-w64-headers/include/http.h
+++ b/mingw-w64-headers/include/http.h
@@ -207,8 +207,8 @@ extern C {
PVOID pInfo;
} HTTP_REQUEST_INFO,
2014-09-21 18:12 GMT-04:00 JonY jo...@users.sourceforge.net:
Patch OK?
...
+ typedef struct _HTTP_REQUEST_V2 {
+struct HTTP_REQUEST_V1;
...
+ typedef struct _HTTP_RESPONSE_V2 {
+struct HTTP_RESPONSE_V1;
Shouldn’t the V1 sub-struct declaration be a variable declaration (and
include