OK for apply ?
---
mingw-w64-headers/crt/process.h | 3 +++
mingw-w64-headers/crt/unistd.h | 5 +
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mingw-w64-headers/crt/process.h b/mingw-w64-headers/crt/process.h
index f43befb..5f635c8 100644
--- a/mingw-w64-headers/crt/process.h
+++
Looks good to me. Please apply to trunk.
Regards,
Kai
--
___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
Hi,
2014-11-07 9:01 GMT+01:00 Dongsheng Song dongsheng.s...@gmail.com:
OK for apply ?
Patch is ok.
Thanks,
Kai
--
___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song dongsheng.s...@gmail.com wrote:
If we define _POSIX_, then getpid (process.h) was hidden.
Is it correct ?
PS: MSVC 2012 is the last compiler which use _POSIX_, MSVC 2013 do not
use _POSIX_ anymore.
MSVC 2012/2013 guard getpid with !__STDC__.
I believe (but not
2014-11-07 9:25 GMT+01:00 Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com:
On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song dongsheng.s...@gmail.com wrote:
If we define _POSIX_, then getpid (process.h) was hidden.
Is it correct ?
PS: MSVC 2012 is the last compiler which use _POSIX_, MSVC 2013 do not
use _POSIX_ anymore.
Minor suggestion: use the word `DECLARED` instead `DEFINED` please.
--
Best regards,
lh_mouse
2014-11-07
-
发件人：Dongsheng Song dongsheng.s...@gmail.com
发送日期：2014-11-07 16:01
收件人：mingw64
抄送：
On 11/7/14, Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-11-07 9:25 GMT+01:00 Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com:
On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song dongsheng.s...@gmail.com wrote:
If we define _POSIX_, then getpid (process.h) was hidden.
Is it correct ?
PS: MSVC 2012 is the last compiler
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/7/14, Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-11-07 9:25 GMT+01:00 Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com:
On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song dongsheng.s...@gmail.com wrote:
If we define _POSIX_, then getpid (process.h)
On 11/7/14, Ray Donnelly mingw.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/7/14, Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-11-07 9:25 GMT+01:00 Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com:
On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 4:44 PM, lh_mouse lh_mo...@126.com wrote:
Minor suggestion: use the word `DECLARED` instead `DEFINED` please.
I don't known which is better:-)
Here is some stats:
$ grep -r _DEFINED[^A-Z0-9] . | wc -l
26145
$ grep -r _DECLARED[^A-Z0-9] . | wc -l
15
2014-11-07 14:45 GMT+01:00 Dongsheng Song dongsheng.s...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 4:44 PM, lh_mouse lh_mo...@126.com wrote:
Minor suggestion: use the word `DECLARED` instead `DEFINED` please.
I don't known which is better:-)
Here is some stats:
$ grep -r _DEFINED[^A-Z0-9] . |
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/7/14, Ray Donnelly mingw.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/7/14, Ruben Van Boxem vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-11-07 9:25 GMT+01:00 Ozkan Sezer
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Ruben Van Boxem
vanboxem.ru...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-11-07 14:45 GMT+01:00 Dongsheng Song dongsheng.s...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 4:44 PM, lh_mouse lh_mo...@126.com wrote:
Minor suggestion: use the word `DECLARED` instead `DEFINED` please.
I don't
On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song dongsheng.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/7/14, Ray Donnelly mingw.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/7/14, Ruben Van Boxem
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/7/14, Dongsheng Song dongsheng.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Ozkan Sezer seze...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/7/14, Ray Donnelly mingw.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Ozkan
15 matches
Mail list logo
