Replaced LGPL with the PD Disclaimer and committed :)
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Kai Tietz ktiet...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Martell,
I can't accept this patch as you are using here LGPL license. The
accepted mingw-w64's licenses are either ZPL (as PD isn't accepted in
all
I'm not sure if this is a cygwin question or a mingw-w64 question.
I'm working on fixing the _lrotl stuff. The changes for intrin.h and
intrin-impl.h were easy. But for whatever reason, MS duplicates the
prototypes for this function in stdlib.h. I have started to update
mingw-w64's
Hi Jacek
Jacek Caban:
Thanks for the patch, but it belongs to GCC and as such gcc-patches ML
is the right place to send it.
I have nothing to do with libssp nor have much experience with GCC
patches, but I have some suggestions:
thanks for both. I'll send it to gcc-patches to see what the
Hi Martell,
I can't accept this patch as you are using here LGPL license. The
accepted mingw-w64's licenses are either ZPL (as PD isn't accepted in
all jurisdications), BSD, MIT, or any other none-copyleft license. We
accept LGPL-licenses only for headers we are adopting from other
ventures,