Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] Don't use __stdcall on ARM

2014-05-07 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 7 00:59, Kai Tietz wrote: Yes, magic wording here is that compiler accepts it and ignores it. So it means not in headers. Sorry, but I don't get this. So per MSDN, x64 and ARM are identical with respect to __stdcall. If so, why is it the right thing to #define __stdcall for x64,

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] Don't use __stdcall on ARM

2014-05-07 Thread Kai Tietz
2014-05-07 14:11 GMT+02:00 Corinna Vinschen vinsc...@redhat.com: On May 7 00:59, Kai Tietz wrote: Yes, magic wording here is that compiler accepts it and ignores it. So it means not in headers. Sorry, but I don't get this. So per MSDN, x64 and ARM are identical with respect to __stdcall.

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] Don't use __stdcall on ARM

2014-05-06 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2014-05-05 16:32, André Hentschel wrote: Am 05.05.2014 23:29, schrieb André Hentschel: Please review, i'll commit it. Again the right patch attached now, it's getting late, sorry. Since stdcall isn't used on x64 either, wouldn't it make more sense to just do the following in _mingw.h:

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] Don't use __stdcall on ARM

2014-05-06 Thread André Hentschel
Am 06.05.2014 21:01, schrieb Yaakov (Cygwin/X): On 2014-05-05 16:32, André Hentschel wrote: Am 05.05.2014 23:29, schrieb André Hentschel: Please review, i'll commit it. Again the right patch attached now, it's getting late, sorry. Since stdcall isn't used on x64 either, wouldn't it make

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] Don't use __stdcall on ARM

2014-05-06 Thread Kai Tietz
2014-05-06 21:15 GMT+02:00 André Hentschel n...@dawncrow.de: Am 06.05.2014 21:01, schrieb Yaakov (Cygwin/X): On 2014-05-05 16:32, André Hentschel wrote: Am 05.05.2014 23:29, schrieb André Hentschel: Please review, i'll commit it. Again the right patch attached now, it's getting late, sorry.

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] Don't use __stdcall on ARM

2014-05-06 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On 2014-05-06 16:37, Kai Tietz wrote: 2014-05-06 21:15 GMT+02:00 André Hentschel: Am 06.05.2014 21:01, schrieb Yaakov (Cygwin/X): On 2014-05-05 16:32, André Hentschel wrote: Am 05.05.2014 23:29, schrieb André Hentschel: Please review, i'll commit it. Again the right patch attached now, it's

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] Don't use __stdcall on ARM

2014-05-06 Thread Kai Tietz
Yes, magic wording here is that compiler accepts it and ignores it. So it means not in headers. Cheers Kai Am 07.05.2014 00:51 schrieb Yaakov (Cygwin/X) yselkow...@users.sourceforge.net: On 2014-05-06 16:37, Kai Tietz wrote: 2014-05-06 21:15 GMT+02:00 André Hentschel: Am 06.05.2014 21:01,

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] Don't use __stdcall on ARM

2014-05-05 Thread Kai Tietz
Patch is ok for apply. Thanks, Kai -- Is your legacy SCM system holding you back? Join Perforce May 7 to find out: #149; 3 signs your SCM is hindering your productivity #149; Requirements for releasing software faster