On Thu, 9 Sep 2021, Patrick Northon wrote:
On jeudi 9 septembre 2021 17 h 13 min 17 s EDT Martin Storsjö wrote:
On Tue, 7 Sep 2021, Patrick Northon wrote:
Take number 2. I moved the adjustment to the exponent into
__pformat_xldouble.
Thanks for this attempt. Now I've poked the
On jeudi 9 septembre 2021 17 h 13 min 17 s EDT Martin Storsjö wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Sep 2021, Patrick Northon wrote:
> > Take number 2. I moved the adjustment to the exponent into
> > __pformat_xldouble.
>
> Thanks for this attempt. Now I've poked the implementation to follow it a
> bit better to
On Tue, 7 Sep 2021, Patrick Northon wrote:
Take number 2. I moved the adjustment to the exponent into
__pformat_xldouble.
Thanks for this attempt. Now I've poked the implementation to follow it a
bit better to see what happens, and now I see the point in your original
form of the patch -
Take number 2. I moved the adjustment to the exponent into __pformat_xldouble.>From b5a399f21cb15f5d3a38b312c7889adede225ff6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Patrick Northon
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 12:11:20 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Fix exponent when formatting long double in hexadecimal.
Some
Actually, nevermind, I got confused when I pulled changes but part of my patch
was overwritten. I'll make another patch with the new proper indentation.
___
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net
On lundi 6 septembre 2021 16 h 15 min 57 s EDT Martin Storsj? wrote:
> Yes - hopefully someone will approve it soon, and I'd land it, then you
> can reapply your changes on top of that. As for why git didn't manage to
> apply your patch from the attachment, I don't quite know though.
I think you
On Mon, 6 Sep 2021, Patrick Northon wrote:
Yes the indentation is funky because the original has one level with a tab
character and spaces for the rest in some parts. I see you have submitted a
patch to fix this.
Yes - hopefully someone will approve it soon, and I'd land it, then you
can
On lundi 6 septembre 2021 06 h 59 min 40 s EDT Martin Storsj? wrote:
> But I feel a little uneasy about the patch - why would we unconditionally
> do a "value.__pformat_fpreg_exponent -= 3;" at the start of
> __pformat_emit_xfloat? I don't see the corresponding adjustment in
> __pformat_xldouble
On lundi 6 septembre 2021 06 h 59 min 40 s EDT Martin Storsj? wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Sep 2021, Patrick Northon via Mingw-w64-public wrote:
> > Hi, here's a patch to fix another problem with formatting long doubles in
>
> > hexadecimal. I found a failing case with a denormalized value:
> Thanks for
On Sun, 5 Sep 2021, Patrick Northon via Mingw-w64-public wrote:
Hi, here's a patch to fix another problem with formatting long doubles in
hexadecimal. I found a failing case with a denormalized value:
Thanks for the patch and testcase!
Git didn't manage to automatically apply your patch and
Hi, here's a patch to fix another problem with formatting long doubles in
hexadecimal. I found a failing case with a denormalized value:
printf("0x2.0p-16385l : %La\n", 0x2.0p-16385l);
Complete tests:
#include
#include
#include
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
puts( " ---
11 matches
Mail list logo
