Re: [Mingw-w64-public] 2.0.8 doesn't build gcc 4.8.0?
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013, Roger Pack wrote: Hello. Despite my not understanding it, for some reason with 2.0.8 I'm unable to build gcc 4.8.0, I get this output: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55706 however, that should have been fixed in r4357, which should have been included in 2.0.8, so I'm at a bit of a loss. Any ideas? (My first thought is...maybe once the VARIANT stuff stabilizes a new release would be possible?) It'd be nice to get off svn. Thank you all. -roger- Hi, You need CRT from trunk. Actually the mainpage states Version 3.0 In trunk, and nearing release, has some Large File Support. Note that GCC-4.8.x requires at least r5437 from trunk to support C++11 std::to_string. Earlier versions will not work. (ok, that's a very recent change) 5437 and not 4357; maybe there has been some mixup. -- Adrien Nader -- Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041391iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
Re: [Mingw-w64-public] 2.0.8 doesn't build gcc 4.8.0?
For most projects that use it, mingw-w64 is grabbed from svn and the releases are largely ignored. Whether that's a good thing or not is another matter of course. On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Roger Pack rogerdpa...@gmail.com wrote: On 9/5/13, Adrien Nader adr...@notk.org wrote: On Wed, Sep 04, 2013, Roger Pack wrote: Hello. Despite my not understanding it, for some reason with 2.0.8 I'm unable to build gcc 4.8.0, I get this output: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55706 however, that should have been fixed in r4357, which should have been included in 2.0.8, so I'm at a bit of a loss. Any ideas? (My first thought is...maybe once the VARIANT stuff stabilizes a new release would be possible?) It'd be nice to get off svn. Thank you all. -roger- Hi, You need CRT from trunk. Actually the mainpage states Version 3.0 In trunk, and nearing release, has some Large File Support. Note that GCC-4.8.x requires at least r5437 from trunk to support C++11 std::to_string. Earlier versions will not work. Ok looking forward to future releases then :) -roger- -- Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041391iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public -- Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041391iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
Re: [Mingw-w64-public] 2.0.8 doesn't build gcc 4.8.0?
2013/9/5 Ray Donnelly: For most projects that use it, mingw-w64 is grabbed from svn and the releases are largely ignored. Whether that's a good thing or not is another matter of course. This situation will be corrected. We(I and Alexey) will building using mingw-w64 releases, just the names of builds will have some another notation. -- Regards, niXman ___ Dual-target(32 64-bit) MinGW compilers for 32 and 64-bit Windows: http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingwbuilds/ ___ Another online IDE: http://liveworkspace.org/ -- Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041391iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk ___ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
[Mingw-w64-public] #ifndef or #ifdef, that is the dilemma
#ifndef __cpluplus std::cout error\n A C++ compiler is required! std::endl; return -1; #endif The above snip says, if __cplusplus has not been defined print “bla bla” and return –1. Which means that if I am using __cplusplus it should NOT print anthing, right? So, am I using the C or the C++ compiler? I am really confused. TIA-- Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more! Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041391iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___ Mingw-w64-public mailing list Mingw-w64-public@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
