Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2

2013-07-09 Thread Alexey Pavlov
2013/7/9 Teemu Nätkinniemi > On 9.7.2013 20:21, Alexey Pavlov wrote: > > Upload new MSYS2 snapshots: > > Does this already work with win32 tools? > > Yes we successfully using it with native Mingw-w64 toolchains for building software. --

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2

2013-07-09 Thread Teemu Nätkinniemi
On 9.7.2013 20:21, Alexey Pavlov wrote: > Upload new MSYS2 snapshots: Does this already work with win32 tools? -- See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with applicatio

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] MSYS2

2013-07-09 Thread Alexey Pavlov
Upload new MSYS2 snapshots: 32-bit: x32-msys2-alpha-20130709.tar.xz<http://sourceforge.net/projects/msys2/files/Alpha-versions/32-bit/x32-msys2-alpha-20130709.tar.xz/download> 64-bit: x64-msys2-alpha-20130709.tar.xz<http://sourceforge.net/projects/msys2/files/Alpha-versions/64-bit/

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] What belongs in winnt.h?

2013-07-09 Thread Jacek Caban
On 07/06/13 11:00, dw wrote: >> 3) Where winbase.h defines __stdcall prototypes for these functions, >> keep the implementation in the library. > You know, now that I think about it, I have to ask if leaving these > __stdcall implementations in the library is actually useful. After all, > it's

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] Fix stray BOOL struct member breaking ObjectiveC

2013-07-09 Thread Rafaël Carré
Applied as r5939 with ChangeLog date set to today Le 09/07/2013 16:46, Kai Tietz a écrit : > Hi Roland, > > thanks for the patch. Patch is ok. Please apply. > > Regards, > Kai > > 2013/7/9 Roland Schwingel : >> Hi ... >> >> Mingw-w64 headers do use WINBOOL instead of BOOL as boolean data type

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] Fix stray BOOL struct member breaking ObjectiveC

2013-07-09 Thread Kai Tietz
Hi Roland, thanks for the patch. Patch is ok. Please apply. Regards, Kai 2013/7/9 Roland Schwingel : > Hi ... > > Mingw-w64 headers do use WINBOOL instead of BOOL as boolean data type to not > conflict with ObjectiveC (GNUStep) BOOL definition. Unfortunately > one BOOL slipped in breaking buil

[Mingw-w64-public] [PATCH] Fix stray BOOL struct member breaking ObjectiveC

2013-07-09 Thread Roland Schwingel
Hi ... Mingw-w64 headers do use WINBOOL instead of BOOL as boolean data type to not conflict with ObjectiveC (GNUStep) BOOL definition. Unfortunately one BOOL slipped in breaking building of GNUStep with current headers. The attached patch fixes this. Roland Changelog: 2013-03-01 Roland Sc

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Confusion as to how mingw works

2013-07-09 Thread JonY
On 7/9/2013 21:40, Baruch Burstein wrote: > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:56 PM, JonY wrote: > >> On 7/9/2013 20:42, Baruch Burstein wrote: >>> >>> Static libraries compiled with the VS compiler (I think toolchain is the >>> correct term?) cannot be used with mingw compiler as far as I know. So >> whe

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Confusion as to how mingw works

2013-07-09 Thread Baruch Burstein
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:56 PM, JonY wrote: > On 7/9/2013 20:42, Baruch Burstein wrote: > > > > Static libraries compiled with the VS compiler (I think toolchain is the > > correct term?) cannot be used with mingw compiler as far as I know. So > when > > I compile with mingw and a static CRT, whi

Re: [Mingw-w64-public] Confusion as to how mingw works

2013-07-09 Thread JonY
On 7/9/2013 20:42, Baruch Burstein wrote: > My understanding was always that mingw, as opposed to Cygwin, didn't supply > a CRT, but instead used the Windows CRT. I never gave this a second thought > until recently, and am now very confused. Partially correct, mingw does have a CRT for supplementi

[Mingw-w64-public] Confusion as to how mingw works

2013-07-09 Thread Baruch Burstein
My understanding was always that mingw, as opposed to Cygwin, didn't supply a CRT, but instead used the Windows CRT. I never gave this a second thought until recently, and am now very confused. Static libraries compiled with the VS compiler (I think toolchain is the correct term?) cannot be used w