Liu Hao 2017-08-15 05:59:
When I click the Register button the page reloads and nothing happens
thereafter.
+1
--
Regards, niXman
___
Dual-target(32 & 64-bit) MinGW-W64 compilers for 32 and 64-bit Windows:
https://sf.net/p/mingw-w64/
-
On 2017/8/15 3:22, Adrien Nader wrote:
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017, niXman wrote:
Norbert Pfeiler 2017-08-14 18:19:
What do you want the contents to be? (regarding it currently shows 2
versions)
I usually update Msys2 and Arch where only 1 version applies.
will be better if you explain how I can upd
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017, niXman wrote:
> Norbert Pfeiler 2017-08-14 18:19:
> >What do you want the contents to be? (regarding it currently shows 2
> >versions)
> >I usually update Msys2 and Arch where only 1 version applies.
>
> will be better if you explain how I can update this myself.
Scroll to t
Norbert Pfeiler 2017-08-14 18:19:
What do you want the contents to be? (regarding it currently shows 2
versions)
I usually update Msys2 and Arch where only 1 version applies.
will be better if you explain how I can update this myself.
--
Regards, niXman
___
What do you want the contents to be? (regarding it currently shows 2
versions)
I usually update Msys2 and Arch where only 1 version applies.
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 4:47 PM niXman wrote:
> JonY via Mingw-w64-public 2017-08-14 17:18:
> > On 08/14/2017 12:28 PM, niXman wrote:
>
> > Would you pleas
JonY via Mingw-w64-public 2017-08-14 17:18:
On 08/14/2017 12:28 PM, niXman wrote:
Would you please update mingw-builds on this page?
http://mingw-w64.org/doku.php/download
I do not know how.
--
Regards, niXman
___
Dual-target(32 & 64-bit) Min
On 08/14/2017 12:28 PM, niXman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The new builds of MinGW-W64 based on GCC-7.1.0 with bugfix
> 647(https://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64/bugs/647/) is uploaded.
> MinGW-w64 v5.x is used.
>
>
Would you please update mingw-builds on this page?
http://mingw-w64.org/doku.php/download
T
Hi,
The new builds of MinGW-W64 based on GCC-7.1.0 with bugfix
647(https://sourceforge.net/p/mingw-w64/bugs/647/) is uploaded.
MinGW-w64 v5.x is used.
32-bit:
posix-sjlj:
https://sf.net/projects/mingw-w64/files/Toolchains%20targetting%20Win32/Personal%20Builds/mingw-builds/7.1.0/threads-posi
>
> Can you briefly summarize what change this does and why it's necessary,
> since the plain mingw patch as such seems to work already both with
> binutils ld and with lld? Is it in order to guarantee that the symbols in
> the mingw patch are sorted correctly so that we can be sure that the
> mark
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017, Martell Malone wrote:
Hey Martin,
I had a discussion with Nick and CC'd kai on getting the binutils patch in
tree a week ago.
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-08/msg00123.html
It seems to be moving along.
Oh, I see - ok.
Can you briefly summarize what change this
Hey Martin,
I had a discussion with Nick and CC'd kai on getting the binutils patch in
tree a week ago.
https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-08/msg00123.html
It seems to be moving along.
Best,
Martell
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 8:49 AM, Martin Storsjö wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Aug 2017, David Grays
On Sat, 5 Aug 2017, David Grayson wrote:
Oops, here is the patch.
On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:14 AM, David Grayson wrote:
I think Martell's last patch would have worked but it's not as safe as
I would like it to be. I think the constructor and destructor lists
should not be defined in gccmain.
12 matches
Mail list logo
