I would prefer to have the same names for headers and crt configure
arguments. Other than that, it looks good to me.
Thanks,
Jacek
On 11/10/17 10:07 PM, Kai Tietz via Mingw-w64-public wrote:
Patch looks ok to me. Jacek any comments?
Thanks
Kai
Am 10.11.2017 21:50 schrieb "Martin Storsjö"
Patch is Ok.
Thanks
Kai
2017-11-10 10:03 GMT+01:00 Martin Storsjö :
> Some object files in the crt build were previously built with _CRTBLD,
> but not all of them. This lead to these wrappers not defining the
> unprefixed function (since that would cause warnings about
On 2017/11/11 21:47, Hannes Domani via Mingw-w64-public wrote:
Am Samstag, 11. November 2017, 10:15:00 MEZ hat Liu Hao
Folgendes geschrieben:
Debugging in assembly exposes indirection through a null pointer in
`mingw-w64-crt/stdio/mingw_wvfscanf.c` around or after line 906:
On Sat, 11 Nov 2017, Jacek Caban wrote:
I would prefer to have the same names for headers and crt configure
arguments. Other than that, it looks good to me.
Yes, that's probably good. I originally had some thought about why I made
them different, because what they do is subtly different, but
On 11 November 2017 at 21:47, Hannes Domani via Mingw-w64-public
wrote:
> Am Samstag, 11. November 2017, 10:15:00 MEZ hat Liu Hao
> Folgendes geschrieben:
>
>> Debugging in assembly exposes indirection through a null pointer in
>>
Am Samstag, 11. November 2017, 10:15:00 MEZ hat Liu Hao
Folgendes geschrieben:
> Debugging in assembly exposes indirection through a null pointer in
> `mingw-w64-crt/stdio/mingw_wvfscanf.c` around or after line 906:
>
> ```
> optimize_alloc ((flags & IS_ALLOC_USED) != 0,
On 2017/11/11 12:41, David Lee wrote:
Hello,
Tried to compile and run the following C code on Windows (with
gcc/mingw-w64), and it crashed at the swscanf() call:
#define __USE_MINGW_ANSI_STDIO 1
#include
int
main(void)
{
wchar_t buf[] = L"1 2 3";
wchar_t field[10];