On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 10:40:00PM -0600, Tobias Weingartner wrote:
On Sunday, July 24, bofh wrote:
On 7/24/05, George Georgalis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the sense there is a way to use GENERIC, somehow I just need to
tell the kernel the BIOS disk 0x80 is wd0, 0x81 is wd1, 0x82 is
To create a collision is non-trivial and would also drastically
change the filesizes.
Sorry,
davidu
You're (maybe) right but lets take a look at this file:
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/i386/MD5
There's no entry for the Size...
Btw: Because another guy told me to buy a CD: I
Hello Group,
I tried to install OpenBSD 3.7 on an Intel Pentium4 system with a 3ware
Escalade 8006-2LP raid controller but the installation hangs with a
system freeze. I found in the supported hardware section of the OpenBSD
documentation under RAID and Cache Controllers:
- 3ware Escalade
Hi guys ,
How can I make it works the usb modem conexant Amigo
under OpenBSD ?
On linux I have to recompile the kernel and do other
stuff to make it works ...
Have any of you have succedded using this kind of Adsl
Usb modem ?
Thanks in advance ,
Regards ,
Richard Karcher
Ricardo
Hi
On wi(4) wlan cards it is possible to get the desired nwid with
WI_RID_DESIRED_SSID, independent whether the card is associated to an
access point or not.
Cards with other drivers, are using SIOCG80211NWID to get the nwid. But
this value contains the actual nwid associated to, not the one I
--On 24 July 2005 14:25 -0700, b h wrote:
Checking special files and directories.
Output format is:
filename:
criteria (shouldbe, reallyis)
missing: ./etc/acpi
Check you have updated /etc/mtree files from /usr/src/etc and have run
mtree (right near the end of
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 15:24:06 -0700
Miles Keaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wondering if anyone has seen a trend these days for most companies to
block all but port 80 or something?
FYI, we block *everything*, employees have to use our proxyserver (squid)
to browse the web.
---
Lars Hansson
On Monday 25 July 2005 11:17, you wrote:
Is it possible to disable IPv6 on OpenBSD 3.7 without building a custom
kernel ?
I suggest that you leave it untouched. If you decide not to do so, be prepared
to encounter problems without any support from here. This issue appeared some
time ago (and
See the archives. Here's is one example:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=openbsd-miscm=109473296323761w=2
Andreas
On 25/07/05, Gordon Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to disable IPv6 on OpenBSD 3.7 without building a custom
kernel ?
--
Andreas Kahari
PGP: 1024D/C2E163CB
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:17:56 +0100
Gordon Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to disable IPv6 on OpenBSD 3.7 without building a custom
kernel ?
No.
---
Lars Hansson
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 10:17 +0100, Gordon Ross wrote:
Is it possible to disable IPv6 on OpenBSD 3.7 without building a custom
kernel ?
No, but why would you need to? Just don't assign an Internet-routable
IPv6 address to the interface, if you're worried about security.
--
Shawn K. Quinn
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 10:37:29PM -0700, Jonathan Walther wrote:
I've read the carp manpage, but am not clear if carp is able to help in
the following scenario:
A box at a high availability colo site forwards some traffic to a
company LAN using a VPN. There are two VPN connections it could
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw: Because another guy told me to buy a CD: I do
But what's about ARCHs wich ar enot on the CD?
Which reminds me: I'd love to be able to *buy* a DVD from Wim with all
i386 packages. I know how to make one, but if I'm buying the pack, I'd
like to have all the
eManager Notification *
The following mail was blocked since it contains sensitive content.
Source mailbox: misc@openbsd.org
Destination mailbox(es): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Policy: LGI Policies
Action: Delete
Content filter has detected a sensitive e-mail.
On 2005-07-25 08:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And yes: Adding another Checksum wouldn't prevent an Attacker to recrete
these files and replace them. But the chance isn't very high that an
attackler could own 3 or 4 different Servers in different networks at the
same time. So every user would be
On 2005-07-25 12:16, Erik Wikstrvm wrote:
On 2005-07-25 08:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And yes: Adding another Checksum wouldn't prevent an Attacker to recrete
these files and replace them. But the chance isn't very high that an
attackler could own 3 or 4 different Servers in different
On 2005-07-25 08:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And yes: Adding another Checksum wouldn't prevent an Attacker to recrete
these files and replace them. But the chance isn't very high that an
attackler could own 3 or 4 different Servers in different networks at
the
same time. So every user would
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 08:00:50PM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
so spake Uwe Dippel (udippel):
Strange, we had the same thing with the last patch.
Looks like the main ftp mirror is not updating. I've left a
message but it may not get fixed for a
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 01:38:01PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MD5 is brocken like rmd160 and sha1. But to make an attack vs. all the 3
algorithms seams to be impossible (for now..).
And it's much harder to not change e.g. the file-size if you created a
collision against all of the
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 09:03:03AM -0400, Clint M. Sand wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 08:00:50PM -0600, Todd C. Miller wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
so spake Uwe Dippel (udippel):
Strange, we had the same thing with the last patch.
Looks like the main ftp mirror is not
Hi all,
I need to create a particular but simple shell for a firewall running OpenBSD
3.6. The idea is create a user whose shell is a very limited one. This shell
or command line interpreter (CLI) must have permissions only in the home
directory.
How could I do this? Any ideas? Editing the
Hi all,
i've a problem with pfsync.
If i permit the change of information throw pfsync the downloads from
ftp server
rarely finish with success. This seem's to affect only the ftp downloads.
I've made a tcpdump from pfsync0 and i can't see a state termination
problem.
Can you tell me if
I'm running bgpd on openbsd version 3.5 (I know, time to upgrade.) I'm
attempting to create a network statement that sets the community value
to NO_EXPORT for a network and I'm getting syntax errors. I've
tried:
network 192.168.1.0/24 set community 65535:65281
And I get:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005, Willi Schiegel wrote:
Hello Group,
I tried to install OpenBSD 3.7 on an Intel Pentium4 system with a 3ware
Escalade 8006-2LP raid controller but the installation hangs with a
system freeze. I found in the supported hardware section of the OpenBSD
documentation under
--- Stuart Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On 24 July 2005 14:25 -0700, b h wrote:
Checking special files and directories.
Output format is:
filename:
criteria (shouldbe, reallyis)
missing: ./etc/acpi
Check you have updated /etc/mtree files from
On 7/25/05, Abel Talaversn Estevez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I need to create a particular but simple shell for a firewall running OpenBSD
3.6. The idea is create a user whose shell is a very limited one. This shell
or command line interpreter (CLI) must have permissions only in the
* G Douglas Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-25 16:30]:
I'm running bgpd on openbsd version 3.5 (I know, time to upgrade.) I'm
attempting to create a network statement that sets the community value
to NO_EXPORT for a network and I'm getting syntax errors.
support for setting communities
Hey folksI'm about to build another obsd server for some pseudo-mission
critical work, and HP is kind of our standard now. I've verified with
someone off list that a DL140's run well, but for performance and
philosophical reasons I'm choosing AMD...looking at a DL145 G2 2Ghz SATA.
I saw some
On Jul 25, 2005, at 10:49 AM, Henning Brauer wrote:
* G Douglas Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-25 16:30]:
I'm running bgpd on openbsd version 3.5 (I know, time to upgrade.)
I'm
attempting to create a network statement that sets the community value
to NO_EXPORT for a network and I'm
On 25/07/05, Abel Talaversn Estevez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I need to create a particular but simple shell for a firewall running OpenBSD
3.6. The idea is create a user whose shell is a very limited one. This shell
or command line interpreter (CLI) must have permissions only in the
Operating ksh in restricted mode may fulfill your needs. Here from
the man page for ksh (this is the public domain Korn Shell in
OpenBSD):
-r Restricted shell. A shell is ``restricted'' if this option
is used or if either the basename the shell was invoked with or the
SHELL
On 7/25/05, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, we block *everything*, employees have to use our proxyserver (squid)
to browse the web.
In a proxyserver like that, if someone tried to go to
http://somedomain.com:8765/ would it work?
From: Miles Keaton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7/25/05, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, we block *everything*, employees have to use our
proxyserver (squid)
to browse the web.
In a proxyserver like that, if someone tried to go to
http://somedomain.com:8765/ would it work?
On 7/25/05, Miles Keaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/25/05, Lars Hansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI, we block *everything*, employees have to use our proxyserver (squid)
to browse the web.
In a proxyserver like that, if someone tried to go to
http://somedomain.com:8765/ would it work?
I am currently out of the office and will return on 7/27. If this is urgent
please reach me on my cell phone 916-704-7077. I will also be checking my
emails periodically.
thanks
mandeep
Mandeep Sodhi
Vice President Sales
R Systems Inc
http://www.rsystems.com
Work: 916-939-5108
Cell:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 05:38:54PM -0500, bofh wrote:
On 7/20/05, Ryan Yu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a problem adding a SATA drive to my current obsd configuration.
I
have two IDE drives in the box. A 12gig and a 40gig. I have the /, /usr,
/var, /tmp and swap on the 12gig and /home
On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Hans-Joerg Hoexer wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 06:43:34PM -0400, Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
The URL:
http://digitalfreaks.org/~lavalamp/openbsd_ipsec_generic.png
Outlines the generic cookie-cutter configuration from vpn(8) with
addressing changes. A couple of
[IMAGE]
Dear Bank Of The West Customer,
This is your official notification from Bank Of The West that the
service(s) listed below
will be deactivated and deleted if not renewed immediately. Previous
notifications have
been sent to the Billing Contact assigned to this account. As
Yes, one can by commenting out `OPTION INET6' in the kernel
configuration.
And one would want to do that if they don't use, IPv6, since it's
pointless fat otherwise.
- Russell
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 04:57:17AM -0500, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 10:17 +0100, Gordon Ross wrote:
Go ahead if you want to use a custom un-supported system.
What is it that you think you're gaining from this?
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 08:29:19AM +0800, Russell J. Wood wrote:
Yes, one can by commenting out `OPTION INET6' in the kernel
configuration.
And one would want to do that if they
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:29:19 +0800, Russell J. Wood wrote:
Yes, one can by commenting out `OPTION INET6' in the kernel
configuration.
You have the OP asking if he can disable it on OpenBSD 3.7 without
building a custom kernel ?
and you offer that really bright solution ?
Just commenting it out
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 08:42:29PM -0400, Brad wrote:
Go ahead if you want to use a custom un-supported system.
Thanks, I will.
What is it that you think you're gaining from this?
A system without IPv6.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 08:29:19AM +0800, Russell J. Wood wrote:
Yes, one can by
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 10:51:05AM +1000, Rod.. Whitworth wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:29:19 +0800, Russell J. Wood wrote:
Yes, one can by commenting out `OPTION INET6' in the kernel
configuration.
You have the OP asking if he can disable it on OpenBSD 3.7 without
building a custom
On 7/26/05, Russell J. Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 08:42:29PM -0400, Brad wrote:
Go ahead if you want to use a custom un-supported system.
Thanks, I will.
What is it that you think you're gaining from this?
A system without IPv6.
you won't. you'll get a
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:58:38 +0800
Russell J. Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Wow. I'm honestly suprised by the responses I've received. All I did
: was answer a question and now I'm being jumped on, repeatedly.
You told a user how to aim the proverbial gun at their foot. I'm
suprised the
On July 25, 2005 7:34 pm, Peter Hessler wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:58:38 +0800
Russell J. Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: Wow. I'm honestly suprised by the responses I've received. All I did
: was answer a question and now I'm being jumped on, repeatedly.
You told a user how to aim the
Rafael Marques Parra wrote:
Could you send me your line about the right button mouse emulation ??? I have a
powerbook g4 and I use windowmaker so I need the emulation.
Thanks in advance.
Hi Rafael,
Sure, here is my ~/.Xmodmap:
keycode 76 = Pointer_Button2 Pointer_Drag2
keycode 95 =
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 08:42:33 -0700
Miles Keaton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a proxyserver like that, if someone tried to go to
http://somedomain.com:8765/ would it work?
If it was set up to allow connections to port 8765 it would but that pretty
much defeats the purpose of doing the blocking
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:29:19 +0800
Russell J. Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, one can by commenting out `OPTION INET6' in the kernel
configuration.
That wasnt the question. The question was if it can be done WITHOUT
a custom kernel and the answer to that is no.
---
Lars Hansson
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 10:54:00AM +0100, Stephen Marley wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 10:37:29PM -0700, Jonathan Walther wrote:
I've read the carp manpage, but am not clear if carp is able to help
in the following scenario:
A box at a high availability colo site forwards some traffic to a
Hi all,
how much truth is actually in this article???
http://www.securitypipeline.com/165700439
Thankyou so much
Kind regards
Siju
+++ Siju George [Tue Jul 26, 2005 at 10:18:56AM +0530]:
how much truth is actually in this article???
It makes a lot of sense and is right on. What I take out of this article is
that having one single firewall (can be any type: network, application etc.)
at the perimeter doesn't stop hackers.
Hey.
I am trying hard to get some USB devices to work on a VIA EPIA-V
board with VIA VT83C572
USB chipset using OpenBSD 3.7 (see dmesg below). I tried it with an
USB stick an an
USB Ethernet adapter, both worked on an other machine with an asus
board and openbsd 3.6,
so i am sure that
On 7/25/05, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
how much truth is actually in this article???
http://www.securitypipeline.com/165700439
Bla bla bla firewalls are dead bla bla bla defense in depth bla bla bla.
Ultimately the good points the author makes are
1) you really should be
Cool. Thanks for your help, everyone.
55 matches
Mail list logo
