On Monday 25 July 2005 16.52, Mike Shaw wrote:
Hey folksI'm about to build another obsd server for some pseudo-mission
critical work, and HP is kind of our standard now. I've verified with
someone off list that a DL140's run well, but for performance and
philosophical reasons I'm choosing
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 08:57:06PM -0700, Jonathan Walther wrote:
You could run ospfd (or quagga) on each host. (You'll need to use gif
or gre tunnels to give a multicast capable link over the vpns). Make
the dsl tunnel the lower cost route and ospf will change the routing
tables to use the
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:22:43 +0300, Tomas wrote:
BTW Edd, I liked your trick :)
Me, too !!
maybe something wrong still on my side, though;
because the trick only works with an additional
chown _mysql:_mysql /var/www/var/run/mysql/
in my case, otherwise I get
050726 16:57:22 mysqld started
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 03:05:37AM +0200, knitti wrote:
On 7/26/05, Russell J. Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 08:42:29PM -0400, Brad wrote:
Go ahead if you want to use a custom un-supported system.
Thanks, I will.
What is it that you think you're gaining
chown _mysql:_mysql /var/www/var/run/mysql/
Because mine was on my laptop (which isnt connected to the network
when I run mysql. Infact I hardly ever run mysql), I took the shortcut
'mysqld_safe --user=root' to start it.
You are right, the mysql user will have to have access
Edd
knitti said:
What is it that you think you're gaining from this?
A system without IPv6.
you won't. you'll get a kernel without IPv6. and a broken system.
knitti's right.
But why do you so much against Ipv6?
--
Adam Papai
D i g i t a l Influence
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: +36 30
* Russell J. Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-26 02:36]:
Yes, one can by commenting out `OPTION INET6' in the kernel
configuration.
the question was specifically (and for good reasons) for doing so
WITHOUT compiling a custom kernel.
And one would want to do that if they don't use, IPv6, since
I seem to remember seeing a patch to spamd that makes greylisting only
look at the first /24 of the address, but I can't find it after fairly
extensive searching with google/marc. Does anyone have a copy they
could point me at?
The whitelists on puremagic.com (on which greylisting.org's lists
On 7/25/05, Jon Drews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/25/05, Abel Talaversn Estevez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to create a particular but simple shell for a firewall running
OpenBSD
3.6. The idea is create a user whose shell is a very limited one.
Hi:
Operating ksh in restricted
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 10:05:32PM -0700, Bruno Delbono wrote:
how much truth is actually in this article???
It makes a lot of sense and is right on. What I take out of this article is
that having one single firewall (can be any type: network, application etc.)
at the perimeter doesn't stop
Hello,
I'm trying to go from stable to current.
I have the kernel and userland in place but having trouble updating my desktop.
When trying to compile gnome I'm getting errors on the dependencies conflicting
with older versions of themselves?
Is there anyway to tell the make command to force
On 26/07/05, Kevin MacPherson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to go from stable to current.
I have the kernel and userland in place but having trouble updating my
desktop.
When trying to compile gnome I'm getting errors on the dependencies
conflicting with older versions of
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 03:20:05PM +0200, Jurjen Oskam wrote:
snip
It does look like the before situation in the article is one where there
is only one firewall that separates the LAN from the Internet, and
everything on the LAN is treated equally, workstations and servers alike.
From: Terry Tyson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Generally, that is a bad situation. So, the advice to put
different types
of machines into different (protected) networks is good.
I only have one firewall but it is three legged, the DMZ box and the
LAN are seperate. Is this what you mean by
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 11:20:35AM -0500, Terry Tyson wrote:
I only have one firewall but it is three legged, the DMZ box and the
LAN are seperate. Is this what you mean by different (protected)
networks?
Everything depends on your particular situation and needs, but the
general idea is that
Which path should I use in a directory directive in the config file
for a chrooted httpd?
In both cases below, changing Deny to Allow achieves the desired effect.
thanks!
Directory /var/www/users/*
AllowOverride FileInfo AuthConfig Limit Options
Options MultiViews Indexes
From what everyone told me last time, the SK stuff is good. So I can
fit my network together with a few dual cards, trunk the smaller stuff
together and then be on my way. Trouble is I cannot find (for the life
of me) anything dual based on the marvell stuff.
The obsd man page
Hopefully this more general question is appropriate here. I've
noticed sales for the Zaurus SL-5500. Geeks.com has a sale on
them right now.
My question is if it makes sense for efforts to support any of
the other units besides the C3000 and C3100. I know very little
about the Zaurus
* Bill Chmura [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-26 19:48]:
For dual it only lists the SK-9822 SK-NET GE-T dual port, copper
adapter, which from threads I read is now realTek chips in the newer
revs.
huh? that was linksys or dlink or netgear or one of the usual bandits.
The SysKonnect stuff was and is
Sometime this morning, our openbsd firewall/VPN server entered a state
where it stopped forwarding encrypted traffic over the enc0 interface. Incoming
roadwarrior connections establish tunnels fine, but nothing is sent over
enc0. There have been no isakmpd or pf configuration changes. There's
On Tuesday July 26 2005 11:09 am, Edd Barrett wrote:
Today 11:09:49 am
On 26/07/05, Kevin MacPherson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to go from stable to current.
I have the kernel and userland in place but having trouble updating my
desktop. When trying to compile gnome
Hi,
I had a great design redesign and secure a client's network. Once I got
on site, there was a little surprise for me ... I can't re number a
router that I had hoped to.
Right now, there are multiple gateways on one network (all the gateways
are plugged into one switch). They have a
On 7/26/05, Greg Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/26/05, STeve Andre' [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hopefully this more general question is appropriate here. I've
noticed sales for the Zaurus SL-5500. Geeks.com has a sale on
them right now.
I've been thinking about one myself even
Hi,
That sounds great! Thanks very much for pointing that out, I would
never have thought about sysctl to control that...
Cheers,
Steve
Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
From: Steve Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The main network is 192.168.11.0/24. The default gateway for the
network
Another way is this:
# MySQL
if [ -x /usr/local/bin/mysqld_safe ]; then
echo -n ' mysqld'
rm -f /var/www/var/run/mysql/mysql.sock
/usr/local/bin/mysqld_safe /dev/null
sleep 10
ln /var/run/mysql/mysql.sock /var/www/var/run/mysql/mysql.sock
fi
That's my
Hi list,
is it possible to have the following:
rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port 80 - $server
re-written as:
rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to domain.com port 80 - $server
where $server an internal web server and domain.com a specific domain
name?
In general I would like to
--On 27 July 2005 00:27 +0200, GV wrote:
is it possible to have the following:
rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port 80 - $server
re-written as:
rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to domain.com port 80 - $server
where $server an internal web server and domain.com a specific
domain
I've done the googling and turned up empty :( I'm trying to get the
included icons to show when someone does a directory view, but
everything I try comes back with:
[Wed Jul 27 01:35:57 2005] [error] [client 192.168.0.3] (13)Permission
denied: access to /icons/movie.gif failed because
Hey folks,
i am doing efforts in order to learn about xdr/rpc. So, i decided to
read some code in src/lib/libc/rpc. I found it to be a little heavy,
cause there too many function invocation overhead between the caller
and the real function that do the job.
So, i wonder if anybody knows an
On 7/26/05, Bruno Delbono [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+++ Siju George [Tue Jul 26, 2005 at 10:18:56AM +0530]:
how much truth is actually in this article???
It makes a lot of sense and is right on. What I take out of this article is
that having one single firewall (can be any type: network,
On 7/26/05, Siju George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/26/05, Bruno Delbono [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+++ Siju George [Tue Jul 26, 2005 at 10:18:56AM +0530]:
how much truth is actually in this article???
It makes a lot of sense and is right on. What I take out of this article is
that
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 08:06:59PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
* Bill Chmura [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-07-26 19:48]:
For dual it only lists the SK-9822 SK-NET GE-T dual port, copper
adapter, which from threads I read is now realTek chips in the newer
revs.
huh? that was linksys or dlink
Gustavo Rios [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hey folks,
i am doing efforts in order to learn about xdr/rpc. So, i decided to
read some code in src/lib/libc/rpc. I found it to be a little heavy,
cause there too many function invocation overhead between the caller
and the real function that do the
33 matches
Mail list logo
